[[VIEW_THIS]]

PTAB designates two decisions applying the Fintiv factors as precedential

Sotera Wireless, Inc. v. Masimo Corporation, IPR2020-01019, Paper 12 (Dec. 1, 2020) (precedential as to § II.A)

This decision addressing the Fintiv factors explains that the petitioner’s broad stipulation not to pursue in district court any ground that it raised, or could have raised, in the inter partes review weighs strongly in favor of institution.

Snap, Inc. v. SRK Technology LLC, IPR2020-00820, Paper 15 (Oct. 21, 2020) (precedential as to § II.A)

This decision addressing the Fintiv factors explains that a district court stay that would remain in place until an inter partes review final written decision weighs strongly in favor of institution.

Learn more about these decisions on the Precedential and informative decisions page of the USPTO website.

Stay connected with the USPTO by subscribing to regular email updates.

Visit our subscription center at www.uspto.gov/subscribe to update or change your email preferences.

This email was sent from an unmonitored mailbox. To contact us, please visit our website www.uspto.gov/about/contacts. To ensure that you continue to receive our news and notices, please modify your email filters to allow mail from subscriptioncenter@subscriptions.uspto.gov.