PTAB designates one decision as precedential and de-designates one decision

[[VIEW_THIS]]

PTAB designates one decision as precedential and de-designates one decision

Apple Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc., IPR2020-00019, Paper 11 (March 20, 2020) (precedential)

This order discusses six factors the Board considers in determining whether to exercise its discretion to institute review when there is a related proceeding pending in district court.

Oracle Corp. v. Click-to-Call Techs. LP, IPR2013-00312, Paper 26 (Oct. 30, 2013)

This decision has been de-designated in view of the Board’s Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) decision in GoPro, Inc. v. 360Heros, Inc., IPR2018-01734, Paper 38 at 8-9 (PTAB Aug. 23, 2019).

Learn more about precedential and informative decisions on the USPTO website. 

Stay connected with the USPTO by subscribing to regular email updates.

Visit our subscription center at www.uspto.gov/subscribe to update or change your email preferences.

This email was sent from an unmonitored mailbox. To contact us, please visit our website www.uspto.gov/about/contacts. To ensure that you continue to receive our news and notices, please modify your email filters to allow mail from subscriptioncenter@subscriptions.uspto.gov.