PTAB designates two decisions as precedential regarding filing deadlines under § 315(b) and pre-institution statutory disclaimer

[[VIEW_THIS]]

PTAB designates two decisions as precedential regarding filing deadlines under § 315(b) and pre-institution statutory disclaimer

Infiltrator Water Techs., LLC, v. Presby Patent Trust, Case IPR2018-00224 (PTAB Oct. 1, 2018) (Paper 25)

This decision applies Click-to-Call Techs., LP v. Ingenio, Inc., 899 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2018) and determines that a complaint dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction triggers the § 315(b) time bar.

General Electric Co. v. United Techs. Corp., Case IPR2017-00491 (PTAB July 6, 2017) (Paper 9)

This decision applies 37 C.F.R. § 42.107(e) and denies institution of an inter partes review where Patent Owner has disclaimed all challenged claims prior to institution.

Learn more about these precedential decisions.

Stay connected with the USPTO by subscribing to regular email updates.

Visit our subscription center at www.uspto.gov/subscribe to update or change your email preferences.

This email was sent from an unmonitored mailbox. To contact us, please visit our website www.uspto.gov/about/contacts. To ensure that you continue to receive our news and notices, please modify your email filters to allow mail from subscriptioncenter@subscriptions.uspto.gov.