PTAB designates three decisions as informative

[[VIEW_THIS]]

PTAB designates three decisions as informative

Hulu, LLC v. Sound View Innovations, LLC, IPR2018-00582, Paper 34 (August 5, 2019)

This final written decision determined that the petitioner failed to show that the challenged claims are unpatentable because the petitioner failed to show a sufficient rationale for combining the references.

Johns Manville Corp. v. Knauf Insulation, Inc., IPR2018-00827, Paper 9 (October 16, 2018)

This decision denies institution after the Board determined that showing that the references are analogous and could be combined does not establish a sufficient rationale for combining the references.

Ex parte Linden, Appeal No. 2018-003323 (April 1, 2019)

This decision reverses the examiner’s eligibility rejection of a method for transcribing speech, where the Board found that the steps were not a mental process.

Learn more about these informative decisions on the USPTO website.

Stay connected with the USPTO by subscribing to regular email updates.

Visit our subscription center at www.uspto.gov/subscribe to update or change your email preferences.

This email was sent from an unmonitored mailbox. To contact us, please visit our website www.uspto.gov/about/contacts. To ensure that you continue to receive our news and notices, please modify your email filters to allow mail from subscriptioncenter@subscriptions.uspto.gov.