Comments on Examination Guidelines Update: Developments in the Obviousness Inquiry After KSR v. Teleflex

The following comments were submitted in response to the noticed titled Examination Guidelines Update: Developments in the Obviousness Inquiry After KSR v. Teleflex, published in the Federal Register at 75 Fed. Reg. 53643 (Sept. 1, 2010) and then published in the Official Gazette at 1358 OG 372 (Sept. 28, 2010).

Please note that the following documents are posted as originally received but may contain artifacts of scanning, OCR, or document format conversion.

A. Intellectual Property Organizations and Government Agencies

B. Industry

C. Academic and Research Institutions

D. Law Firms and Legal Associations

  1. American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) [PDF]
  2. American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) [PDF] (identified as duplicate)
  3. American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) [PDF] (identified as signed version)

E. Individuals

  1. Boundy, David [PDF]
  2. Boundy, David [PDF] (identified as replacement)
  3. Brody, Tom [PDF]
  4. Molldrem, Barney [PDF]
  5. Quinn, Eugene [PDF]
  6. Rogitz, John [PDF]