Director's Blog: the latest from USPTO leadership

« Apollo 50: The role... | Blog homepage | Camp Invention prepa... »
Wednesday Jul 31, 2019

USPTO proposes patent fee adjustments

Guest blog by Acting Chief Financial Officer of the USPTO Sean Mildrew

Image of two credit cards

At the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we continuously work to reinforce the predictability, reliability, and quality of patent rights. To meet this challenge, the USPTO requires a predictable and sufficient stream of funding, which means that we must continually review our fees and adjust them as appropriate.

Today’s notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding USPTO fees is the result of a comprehensive biennial fee review that began in 2017, when we analyzed the effects of proposed fee changes on our operating model. At that time, we concluded that fee adjustments would be necessary to provide the resources needed to improve patent operations, including implementing the USPTO 2018-2022 Strategic Plan. As part of our analysis, we also received feedback on an initial fee proposal via a Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC) hearing conducted in September 2018 and a report issued by PPAC in October 2018. As a result, the proposed fee adjustments outlined in the NPRM increase certain patent fees where there are specific needs and increase the remaining fees at a set percentage to address rising expenses.  The significant percentage discounts for small and micro entities are maintained.

With this additional funding, we will:

  • Enhance the quality and timeliness of patent examination in order to produce more reliable and predictable patent rights.
  • Enhance the quality and timeliness of AIA trials by providing sufficient judicial and administrative resources to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
  • Replenish the patent operating reserve to further stabilize our finances, enabling us to deliver more reliable and predictable service levels, even in times of financial fluctuations.

We welcome feedback on the proposed changes. A 60-day public comment period is now open. After reviewing and considering the public comments, we expect to prepare a final rule for publication during the summer of 2020.

The NPRM can be accessed here. The preferred method for submitting comments is email addressed to Comments are preferred to be submitted in plain text, but also may be submitted in portable document format (PDF) or a word processing format. Because comments will be made available for public inspection, information that the submitter does not desire to make public, such as an address or phone number, should not be included in the comments. Comments on the fee proposals are due by September 30, 2019.


This fee increase will widen the disproportional advantage of those who can afford paying for IP lawyer. Pro-Se inventors would be further in disadvantage. We need instead to continue improve ways to protect the American Dream to any any ingenious person, and this include providing affordable fees, better support to Pro-Se and fair examination.

Posted by Angelica F White on August 04, 2019 at 01:35 PM EDT #

The cost to obtain a patent is already beyond what most people in this country can afford. Patents are just for the wealthy now.

Posted by Tia Loya on August 06, 2019 at 09:32 AM EDT #

The low patent application fee is helpful but not sufficient to maximize the gain for the USA, because most inventors don't have the money to put their inventions in production, and they loose it. I suggest the USPTO form an evaluation group to rate top ideas and offer them to suitable companies for development and marketing for a fixed % ownership set by the inventor.

Posted by John D, Watts on August 11, 2019 at 02:36 PM EDT #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.