Business Methods

Image
A banner of several images that represent Business Methods, including medical, block chain, logistics, and data
 
Select from the following for more information on this page 

Subject matter descriptions   Highlights   Prior partnership meetings   Statistics   Guidance and training materials   Outreach opportunities and presentations   Examiner decision making process   Contact us 

 

The Business Methods area of the USPTO is a collection of subject matter areas in Technology Center 3600 that grants patents related to Data Processing: Financial, Business Practice, Management, or Cost/Pricing Determination. A Business Method patent is a utility patent that protects a method of doing business.  The 3620 and the 3680 workgroups examine applications pertaining to advertising, incentive programs, and coupons; cost/price, reservations, shipping, and transportation; cryptography and business data security; electronic shopping; healthcare; inventory, point of sale, and accounting; miscellaneous; and operations research.  The 3690 workgroup examines applications pertaining to finance, banking, and insurance. The applications examined by the nine subject matter areas in the Business Method area are explained below. 

Subject matter descriptions

 

Return to Top

Highlights

 
Business Methods Partnership Meeting


Partnership meetings are held each year to engage stakeholders. These meetings allow Technology Center management and participants to share information about initiatives and best practices.

 

Partnership meeting materials

Return to Top

Statistics

This section highlights charts and statistics of the Business Methods Practice Area. 

Text version of Business Methods Pendency

Image
This chart shows the first action and total pendency in the Business Methods area from fiscal year (FY) 2015 to mid-year FY 2023. Overall, pendency has gone down since FY 2018. The first action pendency is down to 16.8 months at mid-year FY 2023 and total pendency is down to 27.2 months at mid-year FY 2023.

This chart shows the first action and total pendency in the Business Methods area from fiscal year (FY) 2015 to mid-year FY 2023.  Overall, pendency has gone down since FY 2018.  The first action pendency is down to 16.8 months at mid-year FY 2023 and total pendency is down to 27.2 months at mid-year FY 2023.

Statistics published from prior years

 
 
 
 
 

Return to Top

Guidance and training materials

Below are links to some of the training materials and guidance documents that may be of particular interest to applicants and practitioners in the Business Methods practice area.

35 U.S.C § 101 
 
35 U.S.C § 103 
 
Other examination guidance and training materials 
 

Return to Top

Outreach opportunities and presentations

USPTO outreach opportunities bring together inventors and examiners to promote a deeper understanding of technology and the examining process. Find out more about how you can participate in the patent examining process.

Past Business Methods outreach presentations designed to provide resources and information to our stakeholders 
 

Return to Top

Examiner decision making process

The final say for the determination of patentability resides with the Primary Examiner (MPEP §1004) with the exception of when a Junior Examiner has partial signatory authority (MPEP §1005).  The chart below illustrates decision points and who is the deciding official during the first examination, the subsequent examination, and the appeals process.

Text Version of the Examiner Decision Making Process


High level overview of the examiner decision making process 
 

Decision pointsDeciding official

First 
examination

First examination

During first examination:

  • An examiner with signatory authority decides to reject or allow claims.
  • An examiner without signatory authority prepares an Office action in which claims are rejected or allowed, and a Supervisory Patent Examiner (SPE), Primary or other authorized examiner reviews, approves, and signs the Office action.

Subsequent 
examination

subsequent examination

If a compliant response is filed, then:

  • An examiner with signatory authority decides to reject or allow claims.
  • An examiner without signatory authority prepares an Office action in which claims are rejected or allowed, and a Supervisory Patent Examiner (SPE), Primary or other authorized examiner reviews, approves, and signs the Office action.

Appeals process

Appeals process

If claims have been twice rejected, Applicant may appeal the decision to the PTAB by filing a notice of appeal and an appeal brief.

An appeal conference is held with the examiner, SPE, and an additional conferee having sufficient experience to be of assistance in the consideration of the merits of the issues on appeal.

The Office makes a decision to re-open prosecution, allow claims, or proceed with the appeal.

If a decision is made to proceed with the appeal, the examiner prepares an examiner's answer.


Return to Top

Contact us