Wanted: Your Ideas and Feedback About "RCEs"
Blog by Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the USPTO Teresa Stanek Rea
During the last few years the USPTO has developed and implemented many significant changes to enhance the quality and efficiency of the examination process. We understand that resolving issues as early as possible during prosecution benefits applicants and the public. At the same time, we recognize that many inventions presented to the office are becoming increasingly complex, and may require more prosecution steps to complete a thorough and robust examination. Filing a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) is one of several tools available for stakeholders to resolve issues.
The USPTO currently has a backlog of applications awaiting examination after an RCE has been filed, and we’re actively pursuing efforts to address this backlog. But as we’re doing that, we’re also testing initiatives that may reduce the number of RCEs that need to be filed. For example, the office has initiated two pilots—the After Final Consideration Pilot (AFCP) and the Quick Path IDS (QPIDS) pilot—designed to obviate the need to file some RCEs. The AFCP provides a limited amount of time for an examiner to give more consideration to submissions made under 37 CFR 1.116. The QPIDS pilot is intended to reduce pendency and applicant costs when an information disclosure statement (IDS) is filed after payment of the issue fee. To date about 600 RCEs have been avoided due to the QPIDS pilot. Both pilots are currently set to end on March 23, 2013.
To further assist and help shape future RCE backlog reduction efforts, we want to learn more about the root causes for RCE filings and related pressure points experienced by our stakeholder community. In close collaboration with our Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC), we recently initiated an RCE Outreach program which seeks to gather input from stakeholders about RCEs. The purpose of this effort is not to eliminate RCE practice or in any way disadvantage it, but rather enable applicants to use RCE practice when needed and avoid it when equal or better options may be available. The RCE Outreach program Web page has a wealth of data about RCE filing and prosecution behaviors, an online collaboration tool for submitting comments, and a series of questions about RCE practice. I invite you to become part of the conversation and future solutions. The RCE Outreach initiative will also feature a series of roundtables and smaller focus sessions in Silicon Valley, Dallas, New York, Chicago, and at USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Va. As they become available, the details on how to participate will be listed on our RCE Outreach Web page.
Posted at 05:38AM Feb 12, 2013 in patents | Comments[10]
Posted by Tariq Gbond on February 13, 2013 at 05:56 AM EST #
Posted by Scott Zare on February 14, 2013 at 05:34 AM EST #
Posted by Scott Anderson on February 14, 2013 at 11:19 AM EST #
Posted by William Nixon on February 15, 2013 at 05:29 AM EST #
Posted by Fritz Fleming on February 15, 2013 at 08:47 AM EST #
Posted by Paul D'Agostino on February 19, 2013 at 06:46 AM EST #
Posted by Larry Sternbane on February 21, 2013 at 03:21 AM EST #
Posted by Tom Duong on February 26, 2013 at 02:13 PM EST #
Posted by JohnQpractitioner on March 05, 2013 at 12:26 PM EST #
Posted by Corp Counsel on March 13, 2013 at 06:56 AM EDT #