Pay maintenance fees and learn more about filing fees and other payments
Notices of possible system outages
You can receive the Director’s Forum blog and other publications from the USPTO by enrolling at our Subscription Center.
A Status Update on Use of Third Party Prior Art Submissions and Post-Grant Reviews
Blog by Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO David Kappos
Today marks three months since some of the key new mechanisms of the AIA went into effect. A good opportunity to report on the uptake for two sections -- submissions to the PTAB, and third party prior art submissions. Given the critical mandate of the AIA to empower our stakeholder community to play an active role in assisting the USPTO in its ongoing commitment to patent quality, initial usage of the applicable new provisions is worth reporting, to say the least.
To put the lead first, we’re encouraged by the third party submissions and PTAB filings we’re seeing under the new rules, to date.
We’ve received 88 PTAB submissions, 73 for inter partes reviews and 15 for covered business method reviews. We’re on our way for meeting our FY 13 expectations, and our PTAB Chief Judge James Smith puts it well when he says “momentum is building.”
We’ve received 270 prior-art submissions from third parties, also in line with expectations. The leading art group receiving submissions? TC 3700, which includes many software-related inventions such as those found in electronic gaming devices and medical equipment. And when looking at the spread of submissions as a whole, it’s important to note that there are not a lot of classifications untouched. With many technologies being represented, as opposed to just one or two, we’re seeing that the AIA is indeed supporting the patent system broadly.
So what do we learn from these numbers? First, they demonstrate that the public finds valuable the new ways to interact with the USPTO. Second, they will contribute quickly to improved patent quality. With the PTAB proceedings, we will see valid patents upheld while addressing those that may require correction. With prior art submissions, examiners will be able to consider public submissions and ensure high quality work during the review process.
We’ll continue to monitor PTAB and prior-art submissions. The numbers suggest we’ve got some great new tools at our collective disposal.