Top of Notices Top of Notices   (165)  December 25, 2012 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Print This Notice 1385 CNOG  886 

Benefit Claims, Priority, Electronic Exchange of Documents Referenced Items (162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175)
(165)         Addition of Korean Intellectual Property Office as
            Participating Foreign Intellectual Property Office in
                Electronic Exchange of Priority Documents and
                        Further Procedural Information

   In January 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
implemented a procedure for direct electronic priority document exchange
with participating foreign intellectual property offices. See Changes to
Implement Priority Document Exchange Between Intellectual Property Offices,
72 FR 1664 (January 16, 2007), 1315 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 63 (Feb. 13, 2007)
(final rule). The USPTO established agreements to obtain and provide
priority documents with the European Patent Office (EPO) as of January 16,
2007, and with the Japan Patent Office (JPO) as of July 28, 2007. See 37
CFR 1.14(h) and 1.55(d) and Addition of Japan Office as Participating
Foreign Intellectual Property Office in Electronic Exchange of Priority
Documents, 1320 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 173 (July 31, 2007).

   Effective October 14, 2008, the Korean Intellectual Property Office
(KIPO) will become the third participating foreign intellectual property
office. See 37 CFR 1.14(h) and 1.55(d). Thus, the USPTO will have the
ability to begin electronically retrieving KIPO priority documents from the
KIPO through the Priority Document Exchange (PDX) system. Similarly, the
KIPO will also gain the ability to electronically retrieve U.S. priority
documents from the USPTO through the PDX system.

KIPO priority document retrievals in U.S. applications filed on or after
October 14, 2008

   For U.S. applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) on or after October
14, 2008, the USPTO will automatically attempt to electronically retrieve a
copy of any KIPO priority document without the need for the applicant to
file a request to retrieve in a separate document (e.g., form PTO/SB/38) if
the U.S. application claims foreign priority to the KIPO application and
identifies the KIPO application in the oath or declaration under 37 CFR
1.63(c) or in an application data sheet under 37 CFR 1.76. The USPTO
already automatically attempts to electronically retrieve a copy of any EPO
or JPO priority document to which priority is claimed in a U.S. application
filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a). See Simplification of the Electronic Exchange
of Priority Documents, 1319 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 150 (June 26, 2007) and
Addition of Japan Patent Office as Participating Foreign Intellectual
Property Office in Electronic Exchange of Priority Documents, 1320 Off. Gaz.
Pat. Office 173 (July 31, 2007). In these situations, the requirement for
the certified copy of the foreign application is considered satisfied if
the requirements of 37 CFR 1.55(d)(1)(ii) and (iii) are met.

   Thus, if an applicant files a U.S. application under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) on
or after October 14, 2008, claiming priority to a prior-filed KIPO (or EPO
or JPO) application that is identified in the oath or declaration under 37
CFR 1.63 or in an application data sheet under 37 CFR 1.76, the USPTO will
automatically attempt to electronically retrieve a copy of that KIPO (or EPO
or JPO) application through the PDX system regardless of whether or not the
applicant has filed a retrieval request under 37 CFR 1.55(d)(1)(i) (e.g.,
form PTO/SB/38). If the copy of the KIPO (or EPO or JPO) application is
then received by the USPTO within the period set forth in 37 CFR 1.55(a)
(e.g., prior to the payment of the issue fee), the requirement under 37
CFR 1.55 for a certified copy of the foreign priority application will be
considered satisfied.

   Retrieval may not be effected until several months after the filing of a
qualifying new U.S. application.

KIPO priority document retrievals in U.S. Applications filed prior to
October 14, 2008

   If an applicant wishes the USPTO to retrieve a copy of a KIPO priority
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (165)  December 25, 2012 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1385 CNOG  887 

document through the PDX system for a U.S. application filed prior to
October 14, 2008, the applicant must file a request to retrieve (e.g., form
PTO/SB/38) in a separate document under 37 CFR 1.55(d)(1)(i) requesting that
the USPTO retrieve a copy of the KIPO priority document. Form PTO/SB/38
entitled "Request to Retrieve Electronic Priority Application(s)" is
available for making such a request in accordance with 37 CFR 1.55(d)(1)(i)
from the USPTO Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/web/forms/sb0038.pd
Any such request to retrieve a KIPO priority document through the PDX system
must be filed on or after October 14, 2008, the effective date for the PDX
agreement between the USPTO and KIPO. Any such requests to retrieve (e.g.,
form PTO/SB/38) that are filed prior to October 14, 2008, will not be
recognized by the USPTO as a valid retrieval request under 37 CFR
1.55(d)(1)(i).

Requests for Non-Participating Office Priority Documents under
37 CFR 1.55(d)(2)

   The USPTO will not have the ability to electronically retrieve non-
participating office priority documents from the KIPO under 37 CFR
1.55(d)(2). For example, if the applicant files a JPO priority document
with the KIPO in a KIPO application, the USPTO will not have the ability to
electronically retrieve the JPO priority document from the KIPO through the
PDX system. The USPTO similarly does not have the ability to electronically
retrieve non-participating office priority documents from the JPO under
37 CFR 1.55(d)(2). See Addition of Japan Patent Office as Participating
Foreign Intellectual Property Office in Electronic Exchange of Priority
Documents, 1320 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 173 (July 31, 2007). However, this
service continues to be available through the EPO. Thus, for example, if an
applicant wishes the USPTO to retrieve a copy of a German priority document
that has been made of record in an EPO application file, the applicant must
file a request to retrieve in a separate document (e.g., form PTO/SB/38)
under 37 CFR 1.55(d)(1)(i) and provide the USPTO with the EPO application
number from which the German priority document may be retrieved. See the
Official Gazette notice entitled "Simplification of the Electronic Exchange
of Priority Documents" published on June 26, 2007.

Exclusion of Design Applications and PCT International Applications

   The USPTO cannot at this time electronically exchange design applications
through the PDX system. It is often difficult to distinguish between a
design application number and a utility application number. The USPTO has
determined that the majority of the foreign priority claims made in U.S.
design applications are to foreign design applications as opposed to foreign
utility applications. Accordingly, the USPTO will only attempt to
electronically retrieve copies of foreign utility priority applications to
which priority is claimed in a U.S. design application when the applicant
files a separate request to retrieve a KIPO, JPO, or EPO utility application
(e.g., form PTO/SB/38) under 37 CFR 1.55(d)(1)(i) in the U.S. design
application.

   In addition, PCT international applications are currently excluded from
the PDX system. Thus, USPTO cannot electronically exchange PCT international
applications through the PDX system. Further, the USPTO cannot currently
electronically retrieve non-U.S. priority applications to which priority is
claimed in a PCT international application.

   Note that, in accordance with PCT Rule 17.1(b), an applicant may request
the U.S. Receiving Office to transmit a U.S. priority document to the
International Bureau. This service is independent from the PDX system.

   The USPTO will not retrieve copies of priority applications filed in U.S.
national stage applications under 35 U.S.C. 371 unless the applicant files a
separate request to retrieve (e.g., form PTO/SB/38) under 37 CFR
1.55(d)(1)(i) since the USPTO already, in most cases, receives copies of
such priority applications from the International Bureau in accordance with
PCT Rule 17.2.
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (165)  December 25, 2012 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1385 CNOG  888 


Additional Information Regarding Requests to Retrieve Under 37 CFR 1.55(d)

   The following text will be included on the filing receipt of an
application in which: (1) the USPTO successfully retrieves a foreign
priority document through the PDX system prior to the mailing of the filing
receipt, regardless of whether or not the applicant actually filed a request
to retrieve (e.g., form PTO/SB/38); or (2) applicant filed a proper
request to retrieve (e.g., form PTO/SB/38), but the USPTO has not retrieved
the foreign priority document through the PDX system prior to the mailing of
the filing receipt:

   Request to Retrieve - This application either claims priority to one or
more applications filed in an intellectual property Office that participates
in the Priority Document Exchange (PDX) program or contains a proper Request
to Retrieve Electronic Priority Applications(s) (PTO/SB/38 or its
equivalent). Consequently, the USPTO will attempt to electronically retrieve
these priority documents.

   Applicants continue to bear the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that
the priority document is filed by the time of patent grant as required under
37 CFR 1.55(a). Accordingly, applicants are encouraged to check Private PAIR
as necessary to confirm receipt of appropriate documents. Priority documents
retrieved from the KIPO, JPO or EPO will bear the IFW document title of
"Priority documents electronically retrieved by USPTO from a participating
IP Office."

Sending U.S. Priority Documents to a Participating Office

   In similar fashion, if a KIPO (or EPO or JPO) application claims foreign
priority to a U.S. provisional or nonprovisional application, the KIPO (or
EPO or JPO) will automatically attempt to retrieve an electronic copy of the
U.S. application. However, the USPTO will release copies of U.S.
applications-as-filed to the KIPO (or EPO or JPO) only if the U.S. priority
application has received a foreign filing license in accordance with 37 CFR
5.11, and (1) the applicant of the U.S. application provided an appropriate
written authority to permit access to application by participating offices
(e.g., form PTO/SB/39 or form PTO/SB/01) under 37 CFR 1.14 and 35 U.S.C.
122 (if the U.S. application has not yet been published); or (2) the U.S.
application has been published or patented. Written authority under 37 CFR
1.14 and 35 U.S.C. 122 may be provided by filing in a U.S. provisional or
nonprovisional application either a properly signed (1) "Authorization to
Permit Access to Application by Participating Offices" (Form PTO/SB/39); or
(2) "Declaration for Utility or Design Application" (Form PTO/SB/01) in
which the "Authorization to Permit Access by Participating Offices" has been
checked. Form PTO/SB/39 is available from the USPTO's Internet Web site at
http://www.uspto.gov/web/forms/sb0039.pdf. Form PTO/SB/01 is available from
the USPTO's Internet Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/web/forms/sb0001.pdf.
Note that the USPTO cannot currently transmit copies of design applications
or PCT applications through the PDX system.

   Applicants are advised that KIPO (as well as EPO and JPO) regulations
require a copy of a priority document to be filed with the corresponding
KIPO (or EPO or JPO) application no later than 16 months from the priority
date. Because U.S. applications are ordinarily published by the USPTO after
the time period of 18 months from filing, most U.S. applications that are
the basis for a foreign priority claim in a KIPO (or EPO or JPO) application
will not be published at the time the applicant is required to provide a copy
of the U.S. application to the KIPO (or EPO or JPO). This means that in most
cases it will be necessary to provide the USPTO with appropriate written
authorization (under 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14) for the KIPO (or EPO or
JPO) to access the U.S. application and obtain a copy, e.g., by submitting
a properly signed: (1) Form PTO/SB/39; or (2) Form PTO/SB/01 in which the
"Authorization to Permit Access by Participating Offices" has been checked.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to file written authority in accordance
with 37 CFR 1.14 and 35 U.S.C. 122 for U.S. applications in which there is
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (165)  December 25, 2012 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1385 CNOG  889 

any chance that they will file a subsequent counterpart KIPO, JPO or EPO
application so that those participating foreign intellectual property
offices may timely and successfully retrieve the U.S. priority document at
no charge to the applicant.

   Applicants are, however, also advised that if the applicant files an
Authorization to Permit Access to Application by Participating Offices,
there is no procedure in place that would enable the applicant to promptly
revoke the authorization so as to prevent access by a participating office.
Accordingly, if an applicant does not wish a participating office to have
access to the applicant's application, the applicant should not file the
Authorization to Permit Access to Application by Participating Offices.
Instead the applicant should use the traditional procedure of obtaining and
directly providing a certified copy of the U.S. priority application to any
participating office in which the applicant files a patent application
claiming priority to the prior filed U.S. application.

   There continues to be no fee for this service.

   For further information please contact one of the individuals identified
below:

Don Levin                                Diana Oleksa
TDA Project Manager                      Legal Advisor for IT Policy
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office   OR    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
571-272-3785                             571-272-3291
PDX@uspto.gov                            PDX@uspto.gov

October 14, 2008                                               JON W. DUDAS
                                            Under Secretary of Commerce for
                                  Intellectual Property and Director of the
                                  United States Patent and Trademark Office

                                 [1336 OG 94]