Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Print This Notice 1337 CNOG  2353 

PAIR, EFS-Web, Electronic Submission Referenced Items (236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250)
(246)		      Legal Framework for the Use of the
			   Electronic Filing System

   This document explains the legal framework for the
treatment of patent applications filed under the Electronic Filing
System (EFS). It describes how an electronic application will be
processed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or
Office) and clarifies some issues concerning these applications and the
regulations of the USPTO. It describes, from a legal point of view, the
submission process and the subsequent handling of submissions under the
EFS, including New Utility Patent Application Submissions (Part I),
Provisional Application Submissions, (Part II), Submissions under
Eighteen-Month Publication (Part III), Submissions on Compact Disc
(Part IV), and Information Disclosure Statement Submissions (Part V).

   This explanation of the Legal Framework is a revision
of the version published on April 21, 2002 (1258 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
93) under the same title, and includes updated material concerning the
USPTO's new EFS-ABX patent application authoring tool, which has
replaced the current USPTO authoring tool (PASAT).

Special note concerning third party solutions:

   The USPTO maintains a relationship with certain Electronic Filing
Partners. These companies, pursuing their own business plans, integrate
their technology with that of the Office to provide their customers a
direct channel of submission to the Office. Support is available through
those vendors, with whom the Office cooperates.

   In addition, the USPTO is aware that other intellectual property offices
offer products that are purportedly compatible with the USPTO's EFS server.
The USPTO assumes no responsibility for any incompatibility, error, or
other problem directly or indirectly caused by the use of these solutions.


   Section 22 of title 35 of the United States Code expressly provides for
electronic filing of documents. To the extent that any existing USPTO rule
is inconsistent with EFS, the rule will be interpreted in a manner to
support EFS and will be waived, when necessary, until formal regulations
directed to electronic submissions are promulgated. See Electronic Filing
System Available to Public, 1240 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 45, Nov. 14, 2000
and 37 CFR 1.183. When the Office has more experience with electronic
submissions, the Office will propose specific rules relating to electronic
submission for public comment, and then, after consideration of any
comments, issue final rules.

   This policy is consistent with the directives of current statutory
guidance, including the Government Paperwork Elimination Act, Title XVII
of Pub. L. 105-277 which, in section 1707 states that "electronic records
submitted or maintained . . . shall not be denied legal effect, validity,
or enforceability because such records are in electronic form". The same
section gives electronic signatures similar effect.

   The procedures and policies of the Electronic Filing System (EFS) are
described in this document and the published manuals for the EFS located
on the USPTO Patents Electronic Business Center Web site, at Some of the current regulations, for example, in
37 CFR 1.4, 1.6, and 1.52, refer to the paper and ink physical counterparts
of an electronic submission. For the purposes of submissions using the EFS,
those regulations will be applied in a manner consistent with the
electronic nature of the EFS submissions. Documents submitted in compliance
with the requirements expressed in the EFS documentation will not be held
to be incompatible with the regulations solely because of their electronic
nature or because they were submitted in electronic form.
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2354 

   Currently the EFS may only be used to submit 1) certain non-provisional
utility patent applications, 2) provisional applications, 3) biotechnology
sequence listings, 4) copies of patent applications for purposes of having
the copies of the patent application published (redacted publication,
amended publication, republication as amended, republication as redacted,
or voluntary publication), 5) assignments of patents and applications and
6) Information Disclosure Statements. These submissions are itemized on
the USPTO web site, and discussed below. Patent assignment information,
bio-sequence listings, and Information Disclosure Statements may be
electronically filed for recording and entering with or without a patent
application. Refer to the EFS user manuals for guidance on the USPTO
Patents Electronic Business Center Web site at


How are new applications processed under the Electronic Filing System

   The process for handling the EFS applications is shown in Attachment 1
at the end of this paper. The following is an overview of the process:

A. Applications are "authored" by the applicant/attorney using the
USPTO-provided EFS-ABX authoring template to put the application into
special eXtensible Markup Language (XML) formats that can be accurately
processed by the Office's automated system. With this new EFS-ABX version,
the specification, claims, abstract and drawings are also put into the
Portable Document Format (PDF). The word processing templates, which are
derived from Microsoft Word, allow the user to create an XML patent
application document with tags that identify the content of each element
of the specification. For example, one XML tag will identify the title and
a separate tag will identify the first claim. The PDF version has the
complete page image, plus the text from the original Word document.
In EFS-ABX, drawings and complex work units (e.g., math or chemical
equations, and complex tables) may also be inserted into the template.
These images will also be included in TIFF format, referenced in the
document, as explained in the Users Guide. The XML tags created in EFS
submissions permit the development of automatic application formality
review processing. EFS-ABX allows the user, at any time during the
authoring process, to validate the application document to assure that all
text is properly formatted, all required headings have been inserted, and
images conform to size and format restrictions. The validation process
provides detailed error messages to facilitate correction of any problems
that arise. Once application files are properly formatted, validated and v
iewed, EFS-ABX exports the document as a set of both XML and PDF files that
are compliant with the international standard for electronic applications
specified in the Patent Cooperation Treaty, Administrative Instructions,
Annex F. These files are compressed and password protected so they cannot
be altered without re-entering EFS-ABX.

B. The user then employs the submission software ePAVE (electronic
packaging and validation engine) to attach the compressed and password
protected EFS-ABX file package, complete common data elements and required
forms, attach any desired external files (e.g. oath or sequence listing),
apply an electronic signature to the application, encrypt the signed
application, and electronically transmit the application in XML and PDF to
the USPTO. The electronic signature should be in the /John Smith/ format,
as indicated in Annex F, and consistent with the proposed changes to 37 CFR
1.4(d). The electronic signature is will be indicated on the eventual
official documents stored in the USPTO's Image File Wrapper (IFW) system,
and is the official signature for the purposes of 37 CFR 1.33. Applicant
is urged to maintain an electronic copy of this file, similar in concept
to the admonition of 37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)(ii) for fax filings.

Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2355 

C. At the USPTO, the electronic files are checked for technical compliance,
virus infection and integrity. Under normal circumstances, the digital
signature (part of the public key infrastructure (PKI)) on the document
package will prove valid, thus assuring that the files were not altered
from the time they were signed. An electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
including the Application Number and a Confirmation Number will be produced
and sent securely to the applicant as proof of a successful submission. The
Acknowledgement Receipt also lists the files received by the USPTO with the
name and the size of each file, and includes a unique Message Digest code
that is derived from the submission. The applicant will retain this
Acknowledgement Receipt as clear evidence that on the date noted the files
were successfully received by the USPTO. The Acknowledgement Receipt serves
as an "Electronic Post Card" and is assurance to the applicant in the event
evidence of filing is ever needed.

   An electronic Acknowledgement Receipt, however, does not guarantee that
the application meets all the USPTO requirements for a filing date. For
example, if a non-provisional application submission does not include
required claims, the filing date will be granted when this omission is
corrected by applicant.

   If the files have technical errors, the applicant is immediately alerted
by a return message that does not include an Acknowledgement Receipt as
described above. The return message will, instead, indicate to the
applicant that a problem has occurred. The applicant will be advised to
contact the USPTO for help. If a filing error message is received, the
applicant should not simply resubmit the application without resolving the
cause of the error and contacting the EFS Help Desk. Improper multiple
submissions that contain authorizations to charge a filing fee may result
in multiple charges of that fee to the applicant's account. A request for
a refund will not ordinarily be granted if multiple submissions of the same
application are intentionally transmitted. (If the error occurs after Help
Desk hours, applicant should consider Express Mail or other alternatives.)

What types of utility applications may be submitted under EFS?

   The Office only accepts certain utility patent applications via EFS. The
Office does not currently accept by EFS: continued prosecution applications
(CPAs), design applications, reissue applications, plant applications,
secrecy order or national security applications, national stage (i.e. '371)
or international applications. Very large applications (over 100 megabytes
of compressed data) are accepted only under the compact disc provisions of
Part IV. All other submissions should use conventional paper media and,
when appropriate under 37 CFR 1.52(e), compact disc media. Although the
USPTO permits paper patent applications to be filed in a language other
than English, applications submitted through the Electronic Filing System
must be in the English language.

How are applications kept secure during filing?

   Applications electronically filed under the EFS are submitted using
special software employing public key infrastructure (PKI) technology. PKI
software assures the integrity, authenticity, non-repudiation and
confidentiality of the applications. USPTO security standards are
commensurate with the state of the art in electronic commerce across the
Internet. Applications are maintained in confidence as required by 35 USC
Sec. 122, until the application is published or a patent is issued.

What is the official submission of the new application under the EFS?

   Currently the official copies of all USPTO electronic application files
are the electronic images of the EFS submission entered into the Office's
IFW files. The EFS electronic submission in its original form will be
maintained under electronic records management control, and will serve as
a safety copy if needed during prosecution or later. The document images
stored in the Office's IFW system are the official records used during
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2356 

prosecution. The PDF version from EFS-ABX will be used to create the image
version of the specification (description), drawings, claims and abstract.
The XML version will create the bibliographic data and 18-Month Publication

May a Computer Readable Form (CRF) of Biotechnology Sequence Listings be
submitted with the EFS?

   Yes, the EFS may be used to submit the CRF submission required of
biotechnology applications under 37 CFR 1.821(e) for applications that have
already been submitted or for new biotechnology applications concurrently
submitted using EFS.

May large tables or computer program listing appendices be submitted with
the EFS?

   Yes, the submission software enables the electronic filing of such data
authored in a text (ASCII) format under 37 CFR Sec. 1.58(b) and 1.96. For
EFS-ABX submissions, tables must be submitted in portrait orientation,
although landscape orientation is accepted in paper.

What is the force and effect of the Acknowledgement Receipt sent by the
USPTO under the EFS?

   The electronic Acknowledgement Receipt is not the official filing
receipt for the application. The paper Filing Receipt (37 CFR Sec. 1.54),
PTO Form-103X, is sent after printing the application in step 8 in
Attachment 1 below, and reviewing the submitted application parts for
compliance with 35 U.S.C. Sec. 111 filing date requirements and will
indicate the official filing date. However, the Acknowledgement Receipt
establishes the date of successful submission of the associated documents,
and is thus a crucial part of the application process in establishing the
applicant's filing date.

What is the value of the Acknowledgement Receipt if a problem occurs?

   If the printed version of any document received by the EFS is
unreadable, and if it cannot be recovered from the stored files received by
electronic submission, then the applicant will be promptly notified by
phone, fax or e-mail as indicated in the EFS instructions. Even with prompt
processing, if the volume of submissions is high the Office review may take
place a few days or weeks later. If an error occurs and the application
cannot be reconstructed, the applicant may have to resubmit the application
and petition for the original filing date. Such events are expected to be
rare. Under this scenario, the applicant would present 1) the
Acknowledgement Receipt, 2) a paper version and an electronic version (on
floppy disk or CD-R) of the files as submitted and 3) a petition verifying
that the attached files are the same as mentioned in the Acknowledgement
Receipt for that application number. The Acknowledgement Receipt will
establish that the resubmitted documents were exactly those submitted on
the date of receipt.

What is the date of receipt of an application received under the EFS?

   The application's "date of receipt" is the date that it is fully and
successfully received at the USPTO, as shown on the Acknowledgement
Receipt. The date at the USPTO is controlling for the purposes of original
patent applications. There is no "certificate of transmission" practice for
non-provisional or provisional application e-filings (37 CFR 1.8). However,
because of the automated processes involved, applicants can usually "see"
their submissions over the Internet in the Private PAIR (Patent Application
Information Retrieval) system a short time after submission, which is a
significant reassurance of successful receipt.

   Hours of operation of the EFS will be clearly expressed in the EFS
instructions. If a transmission is attempted when the system is down, the
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2357 

Office cannot accept it and will, if possible, transmit back a notice that
the Office is closed. No Acknowledgement Receipt will be sent. The "closed"
notice will advise the applicant to use alternative filing methods, such as
hand delivery of paper to the USPTO or Express Mail (under 37 CFR 1.10), to
establish the filing date. Remember that new applications under 37 CFR 1.53
cannot be submitted by fax (37 CFR 1.6(d)(3)), and that normal certificate
of mailing procedures do not apply to new applications (37 CFR 1.8(a)(2)(I)
(A) and (D)).

   If an application is successfully received on a Saturday, Sunday or
Holiday, the Office will assign that receipt date at the USPTO to the
submission, similar to the Express Mail practice under 37 CFR 1.10.

Are there any legal consequences of the Office's accepting electronic
patent applications on Saturday and Sunday?

   The USPTO will be open for receiving applications in electronic form
during scheduled hours every day of the week. Hours will be announced on
the Patents Electronic Business Center Web Page, at the USPTO Website: Hours for the Help Desk are also posted.

   Electronic filing will provide applicants with the opportunity to
receive a filing date on any day of the week, including Saturday, Sunday,
and Federal holidays. In addition, consistent with 35 U.S.C. Sec. 21(b),
when the last day for taking any action or paying any fee in the USPTO
falls on Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal holiday within the District of
Columbia, the action may be taken or fee paid on the next succeeding
secular or business day. Thus, under United States law, applicants will
still be permitted to take action on the next business day when the last
day for taking action falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, regardless of
the mode or form of filing.

   Because the conditions for priority rights are governed by national law,
applicants are cautioned to consider possible adverse consequences
regarding the determination of priority periods under Article 4(C)(3) of
the Paris Convention when filing international applications in the United
States. Specifically, the ability to file applications electronically on
weekends may result in loss of priority rights in foreign jurisdictions
designated in international applications filed with the USPTO, if
applicants elect to take advantage of sections 21(b) or 119(e)(3) of title
35. In such circumstances, other Patent Offices may deny the priority claim
on the basis that the international application was not timely filed
according to their national law. For this reason, applicants may prefer not
to rely upon the "next business day" provisions of sections 21(b) and 119(e)
(3) of title 35 when filing international applications with the USPTO, and
instead file the application before the Convention year has expired.


   Provisional applications under 35 U.S.C. Sec. 111(b) can be
electronically authored with EFS-ABX and filed using EFS. The process for
handling EFS provisional patent applications follows the same process
outlined in Part 1 of the Legal Framework and in Attachment 1 for new
utility patent application EFS filings except for the following features of
the process:

	A. Provisional application must include the Application Data Sheet
	(Section 1.76) as the equivalent submission of a cover sheet to
	provide bibliographic information (i.e., inventor names,
	correspondence address, etc.). The entry of a customer number for a
	correspondence address will assign to the provisional application
	the correspondence address associated with the customer number and
	will enable information about the application to be obtained using
	the private Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system.

Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2358 

	B. The EFS transmittal form will automatically include information
	identifying the electronic submission as a provisional application.

	C. If the Provisional Application is subject to U.S. government
	property interest, an explanation should be entered on the EFS
	transmittal form comments section. Provisional Applications
	containing national security related matter must not be
	electronically filed.

	D. Payment of the basic provisional filing fee is required.

	E. The Acknowledgement Receipt returned after a successful
	electronic filing of a provisional application will contain the
	USPTO assigned provisional application number and control number.

	F. Provisional Application submissions under EFS will be indexed
	and sent into the Image File Wrapper (IFW), reviewed for
	completeness, and a paper Official Filing Receipt will be mailed to
	the applicant. The Image File Wrapper containing the electronically
	filed documents (i.e., the provisional application) will not be
	examined or published.

	G. Provisional Applications submitted under EFS may be in the
	English language only.

   Although the USPTO permits paper patent applications to be filed in a
language other than English, provisional and non-provisional applications
submitted through the Electronic Filing System must be in the English


   EFS is also used for the re-submission of patent applications for the
purposes of Eighteen-Month Publication (i.e., Domestic Publication of
Patent Applications Published Abroad under P.L. 106-113 or 18 Month
Publication). See 37 CFR 1.211-1.221 for the relevant rules.

   Ordinarily, the submitted copy of a patent application is used for the
production of the Patent Application Publication, as it was amended 14 to 9
weeks prior to publication date, when it was sent to the publication
facility. However, if applicant desires one of the following:

	a) the publication of a redacted copy of an application (37 CFR
	1.217) or

	b) the publication of the application as specifically amended (37
	CFR 1.215) or

	c) the voluntary publication of an application filed before, but
	pending on November 29, 2000 under 37 CFR 1. 221, or

	d) a republication under 37 CFR 1.221 of an application previously
	published under 37 CFR 1.211 (that is not to correct material
	errors in publication sought to be corrected within 2 months of
	publication via a paper request)

   then the application must be submitted in electronic form using the EFS.
If the applicant requests early publication of the application under 37 CFR
1.219 he or she may submit an electronic copy using EFS, but EFS
submissions are currently only capable of use for publication purposes if
the application is already on file in the USPTO. Accordingly, to obtain
early publication either file the application on paper or through EFS, and,
once a confirmation number is obtained (on the Acknowledgement Receipt if
electronic or the filing receipt if paper), re-submit the application
using EFS and with a request for early publication. Alternatively, the
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2359 

second EFS submission may be eliminated, but publication will be based upon
a paper version of the application. Early publication requests require
submission of the publication fee. See 37 CFR 1.219.

Background: How are submissions handled under the Electronic Filing System
(EFS) for 18-Month Publication?

   The process for handling the EFS submission for Eighteen-Month
publication is shown on Attachment 2 below. Note the following features of
the process:

	A. Applications (including plant patent applications) that are
	submitted for redacted, "as amended," voluntary, "previously
	published" or, optionally, "early" Patent Application Publications
	are authored using the USPTO-provided authoring tools as described
	for new applications above. They must contain a statement that the
	submission does not include any "new matter."

	B. Application files, once properly authored in EFS-ABX, are
	assembled, validated, electronically signed, encrypted, digitally
	signed, wrapped and electronically transmitted to the USPTO. This
	is the same process used for new applications described above. The
	XML version of the application will be used for 18-Month
	Publication and thus the applicant should review the XML document
	using Internet Explorer to see the application content that will be

	C. Any publication or processing fees must be made at the time of

	D. After receipt at the USPTO, the electronic files are checked for
	technical compliance, freedom from viruses and apparent integrity
	as described above for new applications. The Eighteen-Month
	Publication submissions are transferred to the facility that edits,
	publishes and produces the Published Patent Application documents
	directly in electronic form.

Where does the applicant indicate or author the required statement that
this resubmission of the application contains no new matter? What other
certifications are effective?

   The following statement is automatically entered and printed on the
completed EFS Application Data Sheet for every Eighteen-Month Publication
electronic submission:

   "I state that this resubmission of the application contains no new
matter. If this resubmission is a redacted copy of an application submitted
under 37 CFR 1.217, the applicant hereby certifies that the redacted copy
of the application eliminates only the part or description of the invention
that is not contained in any application filed in a foreign country,
directly or through a multilateral international agreement, that
corresponds to the application filed in the Office and otherwise does not
introduce any new matter. Additionally, if this submission is a redacted
copy of an application submitted under 37 CFR 1.217, the applicant further
certifies that the documents and certification required by 37 CFR 1.217(c)
have been filed or will be filed concurrently with the request for redacted
publication (See 37 CFR 1.217(c))."

   In accordance with 37 CFR 10.18 (b), by presenting to the Office
(whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) any paper,
the party presenting such paper, (whether a practitioner or
non-practitioner,) is certifying that  -

   1) All statements made therein of the party's own knowledge are true,
all statements made therein on information and belief are believed to be
true, and all statements made therein are made with the knowledge that
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2360 

whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the Patent and Trademark
Office, knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any
trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations, makes or uses any false writing
or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent
statement or entry, shall be subject to the penalties set forth under 18
U.S.C. 1001, and that violations of this paragraph may jeopardize the
validity of the application or document.

   Entry of one electronic signature appearing on the EFS submission
transmittal will acknowledge all the certification statements contained in
the EFS submission.

May the applicant use a certificate of transmission?

   Electronic submissions for Eighteen-Month Publication under EFS of "as
amended" applications, "voluntary" or "previously published" publications,
or "early" publications may be submitted with a certificate of
transmission. Consistent with the certificate practice of 37 CFR 1.8, the
local date at the place of submission as indicated on the certificate of
transmission will be considered for the purposes of determining if the
electronic applications were submitted in a timely manner. This does not
apply to "redacted" applications submitted under 37 CFR 1.217 that must be
received on the specified date at the USPTO.


   If the Applicant/Attorney attempts to file a Utility or Provisional
Patent Application or Eighteen-Month Publication Submission that exceeds
the EFS system limit of 100 Megabytes of compressed data, the system will
generate an error message and advise the applicant to submit the large
application on compact discs (hereinafter CDs or CD-Rs). Submissions
exceeding 100 MB cannot be forwarded to USPTO over the Internet using
ePAVE. If a large biotechnology sequence listing, table or computer program
listing caused the large application size, the applicant may submit the
application according to the requirements of 37 CFR 1.52 (e) with the large
section on CD and the rest in paper. However, regardless of the cause of
the large size of the submission, EFS can also be used to file the
application in the following manner. The process requires the workstation
to be connected to a compact disc recorder:

   The process for handling large submissions is diagramed in Attachment 3.
Applicant, on creating a large application (>100 Megabytes) will be
instructed by ePAVE to:

   1. Print out the Transmittal Form.

   2. Copy the submission folder containing the whole application from the
workstation to compact disc-recordable (CD-R) media. Do not use floppy or
Zip disks or other media.

   3. Wrap the CD in a hard case within a padded protective mailing
envelope, attached to the Transmittal Form. Enclose a cover letter
explaining that the submission contains an application that was too large
to be submitted under the EFS ePAVE process.

   4. Hand carry, or mail the CD-R and a copy of the paper Transmittal
Form, with the cover letter to the USPTO, or deposit them with the US
Postal Service under the Express Mail procedures of 37 CFR 1.10.

   Applicant is advised to keep a copy of the CD and transmittal form for
his or her records. In step 2 above, an applicant may optionally make a
backup copy of the CD and send in both copies to the USPTO. Label the CDs
"Copy 1" and "Copy 2" and include a signed statement that the two copies
are identical. Copy 1 will be used for processing, unless it is unreadable.
Applicant is advised to electronically "compare" the file on the CD with
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2361 

the files on the computer to be sure of accuracy.

   The USPTO will receive the application package in the mailroom. The date
of receipt of the application will be recorded. The CD will be "uploaded"
to the EFS server. The application files will then be processed as EFS

   If the submission was a new application (as opposed to a submission of
a copy of an application under 18-Month Publication), an Acknowledgement
Form will be printed. However, the Acknowledgement Form will be modified
to indicate that the USPTO mail room date of receipt of the CDs, or the
Express Mail date when they were submitted to the USPS, is the date of
their receipt (the date of uploading to the server will NOT be used). The
Acknowledgement Form is placed in the file with the printed application,
and a copy of the Acknowledgement Form is sent back to the applicant. A
certificate of mailing may be used in the same manner as the certificate of
transmission described above.

   If the files contain large tables, sequence listings or computer program
listings, the Office has the option of not printing the large files, but
rather burning two CD-Rs of such data, and treating them under the CD
practice of 37 CFR 1.52(e). If the file is an amino acid/nucleotide
sequence listing, then one additional copy of such a sequence listing will
be created and used as the CRF. In any case, one CD is placed in the file,
and one is put in the CD repository.

   In other respects, processing will continue as if the application had
been submitted by the standard EFS channel.

   If an application is too large to use this process successfully (about
and over 1 Gigabyte) then please contact the Patent Electronic Business
Center ( Some applications may be too big to process
using the CD techniques and require special handling.

What is Receipt Date for EFS New Utility or Provisional Application Filing
submitted on CD?

   The Filing Date of any EFS New Utility or Provisional Application sent
in by CD (in a "CD package," including a paper copy of the ePAVE
Transmittal form) will be based on the date the CD package is received at
USPTO, if delivered by hand or regular US mail. That date will be indicated
in any acknowledgment. If the CD package was sent to the USPTO by Express
Mail under 37 CFR 1.10, then the date of deposit with the United States
Postal Service will be used.

What is the official copy of the Sequence Listing (1.821 (c)), Table,
Program Listing?

   For applications that are originally filed using EFS, the copy of the
specification that is placed in the Image File Wrapper is the official
copy, with one exception. Sequence listings, large tables, and computer
program listings may be submitted on CD media, according to 37 CFR 1.52(e).
If the Office decides, in a particular instance, to copy a sequence listing
file, computer program listing or large table onto CDs instead of printing
it to paper, the CDs become the official copy. See Notification of United
States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Application Records being Stored
and Processed in Electronic Form, 1271 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 100 (June 17,

   By "official" the Office means the active authoritative copy. The
electronic submission will be maintained as an evidentiary copy of what was
submitted should any questions arise during prosecution or later.

   May an applicant submit more than one copy of the CD to assure

Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2362 

   Applicant is required to submit only one EFS New Utility Application CD.
However, applicant has the option of submitting a second copy of the CD,
but must label the two copies "Copy 1" and "Copy 2", and certify that Copy
1 and Copy 2 are the same. Copy 1 would be used for processing, unless it
is unreadable.

Will Express Mail - submission of EFS New Utility Application CD be

   Yes, if it exceeds the 100 megabytes compressed data limit.

Should applicant be advised to do a file size comparison between encrypted
files copied to EFS New Utility Application CD and the EFS files residing
on the applicant's workstation?

   Yes, the EFS Guide will advise applicants to do a file comparison.


Background: How are Information Disclosure Statements (IDS) processed under
the Electronic Filing System (EFS)?

   Information Disclosure Statements (IDS), except those filed under 37 CFR
1.99, may be electronically submitted to the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO or Office) via the Office's Electronic Filing
System (EFS). When making such an EFS submission of an IDS, paper copies of
U.S. patents and U.S. application publications cited in the IDS will no
longer have to be supplied by applicants. Applicants file an electronic IDS
by (1) entering the references' citation information in an electronic data
entry form, equivalent to the paper PTO-1449 form; and (2) transmitting the
electronic data entry form data to the Office via ePAVE. Electronic
submissions under 37 CFR 1.99 (third party submissions) will not be

What documents may be cited on an electronic Information Disclosure
Statement (eIDS)?

   This electronic form allows only citations for U.S. patents and U.S.
patent application publications.

How does the applicant meet the requirement under 37 CFR 1.98 to submit
copies of cited documents?

   Applicants will NOT submit copies of any U.S. patent or U.S. patent
application publications cited on an electronic IDS form that is
electronically transmitted to the Office.

How are Information Disclosure Statements with foreign patent documents or
non-patent literature documents or unpublished U.S. applications filed?

   If any references to foreign patent documents, non-patent literature
documents or unpublished U.S. applications are to be cited, applicants will
submit those citations on a conventional paper PTO-1449 form (or revised
form PTO/SB/08). A printed copy of each cited foreign patent document,
non-patent literature document and unpublished U.S. application (until
further notice) should accompany the conventional IDS form. Submissions of
these documents may be made by mail, facsimile transmission, or hand

What data is entered in an electronic Information Disclosure Statement

   The ePAVE software provides an electronic data entry IDS form equivalent
to a paper PTO-1449, Information Disclosure Statement form, in which
citations for up to 50 U.S. patents and up to 50 U.S. patent application
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2363 

publications may be entered. Each citation requires the patent or
application number, the name of the patentee or applicant, and the date of
issue or publication. The filer may optionally add the kind code, and U.S.
patent class and subclass code for each citation.

How are certifications and statements of relevance required under 37 CFR
1.97(e) submitted with an eIDS?

   The electronic IDS form contains preprinted certification statements
that allow the user to click on one of the two certifications required
under 37 CFR 1.97(e), regarding citation of the documents in a
communication from a foreign patent Office and knowledge of the cited
documents by individuals under 37 CFR 1.56(c). The electronic IDS form also
contains a free form text area to allow the user to include statements of
relevance or other remarks with regard to the cited documents.

How are fees submitted?

   Since the Non-Patent Literature (NPL), unpublished patent applications
and foreign patent documents are to be submitted in paper, while the US
patents and published applications are indicated on the electronic IDS, the
total IDS may be separated into multiple submissions. Generally a single
fee will suffice. The fee under 37 CFR 1.97(c) must be included with the
first electronic submission of the electronic IDS. Subsequent submissions
of the non-electronic documents will not require a fee if they are received
on the same date that the electronic IDS is received by the Office or were
deposited in Express Mail, deposited in the first class U.S. mail with a
certificate of mailing in accordance with 37 CFR 1.8, or transmitted by
facsimile on the same day with a certificate of transmission in accordance
with 37 CFR 1.8 on the same date as the electronic IDS that contained the
fee. The non-electronic submission must make reference to the electronic

Details of the fee process are described in the documentation of the EFS

How does the IDS data get sent to the Office?

   The ePAVE software validates the format of data entered into the
electronic IDS form and allows the applicant to specify whether the
electronic IDS form is to be linked to an accompanying new application
filing or is being submitted for a previously filed application. ePAVE
transmits the XML formatted IDS data from the electronic data entry form to
the Office.

   As with the other types of electronic submissions, ePAVE will validate
the information, display it to the filer, prompt for the filer's electronic
signature, use the filer's digital certificate to encrypt the whole
package, and transmit the submission to the USPTO. Upon receipt, the Office
will send to the filer an electronic post card "Acknowledgement Receipt"
indicating the date of receipt, the message digest, the application number,
and the names, types, and sizes of the files received by the USPTO.

Is it possible to submit an eIDS subsequent to filing an application, and,
if so, how is any necessary fee flagged?

   The IDS may be submitted as part of a new utility EFS electronic
application filing, or as a subsequent submission for a previously filed
patent application. The ePAVE program will prompt the filer to associate an
IDS file with a new application file and to provide payment information,
where either is appropriate.

   If the IDS submission is subsequent to the application filing, the filer
will be required to enter both an application number and a confirmation
number. A confirmation number is an additional four-digit identifier
assigned to an application, and can be found on the Acknowledgement Receipt
Top of Notices Top of Notices   (246)  December 30, 2008 US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 1337 CNOG  2364 

and in the upper left-hand corner of the official filing receipt. An IDS
cannot be electronically transmitted prior to an initial filing.

How is the eIDS treated by the Office?

   The IDS form submitted electronically will be placed in the Office's
IFW. The cited document numbers will be made available electronically to
the examiner to facilitate searching and retrieval of U.S. patents and U.S.
application publications.

   The IDS form will be entered as a document into the application file
indicating that it was received on the date the form was completely
received via EFS. This is the date the Office will use in considering
compliance with 37 CFR Secs. 1.97 and 1.98. This document will be treated
procedurally the same as any other paper in the file, and will be available
to any party viewing the contents of the file.

   Examiners will consider the U.S. patents and U.S. patent application
publications cited on an electronic IDS form provided the remaining
requirements of 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98 are met, by reviewing electronic or
printed copies produced from the Office electronic databases. Examiners
will indicate which documents were considered by initialing and dating the
paper copy of the eIDS form, and supplying a copy to the applicant with the
next Office action, just as with conventional IDS submissions.

What if the applicant transcribes the document numbers incorrectly into the

   It is most important that the cited U.S. patent and patent application
publication numbers be accurate. Because the IDS filer will not submit
copies of cited documents, there will be no copies of the disclosed
documents in the file wrapper for the examiner to review. Instead, the
examiner will electronically retrieve the patents and application
publications identified bythe cited document numbers.

   The only mechanism for having the correct document reviewed and
considered when an erroneous U.S. patent or application publication number
is cited in an IDS citation will be by citing the correct citation number
in a subsequent IDS that conforms to the requirements of 37 CFR 1.97 and

For further information:

   For further information, consult the EFS documentation on the USPTO
Patents Electronic Business Center web page which includes a complete
description of the EFS process and procedures. It is located on the
Internet at

   If there are any questions on the Legal Framework, please contact Jay
Lucas at Questions on the EFS system should be
directed to the Patent Electronic Business Center at or via email at Correspondence may
also be addressed to Jay Lucas, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.

August 18, 2004					  	   STEPHEN G. KUNIN
					     Deputy Commissioner for Patent
							 Examination Policy

				 [1286 OG 113]

consolidated notices image

consolidated notices image

consolidated notices image