Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

2-21		EX		76507505		Elevator 
		EX 		76507507		Safety Company
		EX 		76507675
		EX 		76507677
		EX 		76507734
		EX 		76507735
		EX 		76507737
		EX		76507741

2-21		EX		78331176		Brian Jay Osterberg

2-21		EX		76507676		Elevator 
							Safety Company

2-22		OPP 		91168402		Drive Trademark 
		(SJ)					Holdings LP v. 
							Inofin and 
							Mark Walsh


				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

2(e)(5) 	Refusal 				8 configurations of 
[function-	Affirmed 				applicant's goods 
ality]; 	as to all 				[elevator roller 
whether, 	8 claimed 				guides]
if not 		marks and 
functional, 	on all 
applicant's 	grounds
claimed 
marks have 
acquired 
distinctive-
ness under 
Section 2(f)

whether 	Refusal					"CONDOMTOY  
applicant's 	Affirmed				CONDOM" 
specimens 						[condoms]
show use of 
its mark in 
connection 
with its 
recited goods

whether		Refusal  				the colors red and 
applicant's 	Affirmed				black applied to 
claimed 						applicant's goods 
mark is 						[elevator roller 
inherently 						guides]
distinctive 
or has 
acquired 
distinctive-
ness under 
Section 2(f)

2(d); 		Cross-motions 	"D DRIVE" 		"DRIVEUSA" 
whether 	for summary 	(and design), 		[financing 
appt. may 	judgment 	"D DRIVE 		services, namely, 
amend its 	denied; 	FINANCIAL SERVICES" 	vehicle loans, 
identifica-	applicant's 	(and design), 		assisting borrowers 
tion of 	motion to 	and "D" 		in applying for 
services; 	amend denied; 	(and design)  		loans, preparing 
whether 	opposer's 	[all three marks 	and originating 
opposer 	motion to 	for: financial 		auto loan forms]
may amend 	amend denied; 	services, namely, 
its notice 	applicant's 	purchasing loans 
of opp. to 	motion to 	from automobile 
include 	divide granted	dealerships]
other 
classes; 
whether 
applicant 
may divide 
out 
unopposed 
classes in 
its 
application


Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						Yes

						No

						Yes


(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION; (MD)=MOTION
TO DISMISS; (MR)=MOTION TO REOPEN
