United States Patent and Trademark Office OG Notices: 03 January 2006
Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
11-29 OPP 91158854 Vignette
(SJ) Corporation v.
(R) Steven Marino
11-29 OPP 91165315 Missiontrek Ltd.
CANC 92044538 Co. v. Onfolio,
(SJ) Inc.
11-30 EX 76498199 Itoya of
America, Ltd.
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
whether Request "VIGNETTE
applicant for Recon- EDITORIAL"
had a sideration [video
bona fide Denied post-production
intention (Applicant's services, namely,
to use its evidence editing of music
mark as of considered videos, TV
the and commercials, and
application opposer's motion pictures]
filing date motion
[whether for
applicant summary
may rely on judgment
certain denied)
evidence it
offered in
opposition
to motion
for summary
judgment]
2(d) Opposition "CARTAGIO" "ONFOLIO" and
Dismissed [computer software, "ONFOLIO"
and namely, internet (and design)
Cancellation navigation soft- [both marks for
Denied ware, that is, computer software
(Motion for internet browsers; for capturing,
summary computer hardware organizing and
judgment in the nature of sharing on-line
granted as database and content]
to both computer management
cases) equipment; internet
research and cost
accounting soft-
ware; software for
hosting computer
servers, and user
manuals sold as a
unit]
2(d) Refusal "XENON"
Affirmed [writing pens]
Mark and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
Yes
No
"XENON" No
[paper and cardboard]
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION; (MD)=MOTION
TO DISMISS; (MR)=MOTION TO REOPEN