Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

4-21		EX		76422584		Advanced Lighting 
							Technologies, 
							Inc.

4-21		OPP		91124869		Nike Inc. v. 		
							Nikepal 
							International 
							Inc.

				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

2(e)(1)		Refusal 				"E-LAMP" 
		Reversed				[in Class 9:  
		[Note: Bd. had, 			metal halide 
		on 11/15/04, 				lighting system 
		affirmed the 				components, 
		refusal to 				namely, ballasts 
		register, but   			and electrical  
		it vacated that 			controls; 
		decision on 				in Class 11:  
		1/13/05 and set 			metal halide 
		the case for 				lamps and metal 
		oral hearing, 				halide lighting 
		which was held 				systems 
		3/9/05]					consisting of 
							lamps, ballasts, 
							and electrical 
							controls, sold 
							as a unit]

2(d); dilution	Opposition 	"NIKE" 			"NIKEPAL" 
		Dismissed	[athletic 		[import and 	
				footwear and 		export agencies 
				clothing, sports 	and wholesale 
				bags, posters, 		distributorships 
				notebooks, 		featuring 
				watches, retail 	scientific, 
				store services 		chemical, 
				featuring 		pharmaceutical, 
				footwear, 		biotechnology 
				clothing, 		testing
				sporting goods, 	instruments and 
				and accessories; 	glassware for 
				and other goods]	laboratory use, 
							electrical 
							instruments, 
							paper products, 
							and household 
							products and 
							cooking 
							appliances]

Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						No

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION; (MD)=MOTION
TO DISMISS; (MR)=MOTION TO REOPEN
