		      Legal Framework for the Use of the 
			   Electronic Filing System

   This document explains the legal framework for the
treatment of patent applications filed under the Electronic Filing
System (EFS). It describes how an electronic application will be
processed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or
Office) and clarifies some issues concerning these applications and the
regulations of the USPTO. It describes, from a legal point of view, the
submission process and the subsequent handling of submissions under the
EFS, including New Utility Patent Application Submissions (Part I),
Provisional Application Submissions, (Part II), Submissions under
Eighteen-Month Publication (Part III), Submissions on Compact Disc
(Part IV), and Information Disclosure Statement Submissions (Part V).

   This explanation of the Legal Framework is a revision
of the version published on April 21, 2002 (1258 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
93) under the same title, and includes updated material concerning the
USPTO's new EFS-ABX patent application authoring tool, which has
replaced the current USPTO authoring tool (PASAT).

Special note concerning third party solutions:
     
   The USPTO maintains a relationship with certain Electronic Filing 
Partners. These companies, pursuing their own business plans, integrate 
their technology with that of the Office to provide their customers a 
direct channel of submission to the Office. Support is available through 
those vendors, with whom the Office cooperates. 

   In addition, the USPTO is aware that other intellectual property offices 
offer products that are purportedly compatible with the USPTO's EFS server. 
The USPTO assumes no responsibility for any incompatibility, error, or 
other problem directly or indirectly caused by the use of these solutions.

GENERAL RULE: EFFECT OF PATENT REGULATIONS

   Section 22 of title 35 of the United States Code expressly provides for 
electronic filing of documents. To the extent that any existing USPTO rule 
is inconsistent with EFS, the rule will be interpreted in a manner to 
support EFS and will be waived, when necessary, until formal regulations 
directed to electronic submissions are promulgated. See Electronic Filing 
System Available to Public, 1240 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 45, Nov. 14, 2000 
and 37 CFR 1.183. When the Office has more experience with electronic 
submissions, the Office will propose specific rules relating to electronic 
submission for public comment, and then, after consideration of any 
comments, issue final rules. 

   This policy is consistent with the directives of current statutory 
guidance, including the Government Paperwork Elimination Act, Title XVII 
of Pub. L. 105-277 which, in section 1707 states that "electronic records 
submitted or maintained . . . shall not be denied legal effect, validity, 
or enforceability because such records are in electronic form". The same 
section gives electronic signatures similar effect.

   The procedures and policies of the Electronic Filing System (EFS) are 
described in this document and the published manuals for the EFS located 
on the USPTO Patents Electronic Business Center Web site, at 
http://www.uspto.gov/ebc. Some of the current regulations, for example, in 
37 CFR 1.4, 1.6, and 1.52, refer to the paper and ink physical counterparts 
of an electronic submission. For the purposes of submissions using the EFS, 
those regulations will be applied in a manner consistent with the 
electronic nature of the EFS submissions. Documents submitted in compliance 
with the requirements expressed in the EFS documentation will not be held 
to be incompatible with the regulations solely because of their electronic 
nature or because they were submitted in electronic form.

   Currently the EFS may only be used to submit 1) certain non-provisional 
utility patent applications, 2) provisional applications, 3) biotechnology 
sequence listings, 4) copies of patent applications for purposes of having 
the copies of the patent application published (redacted publication, 
amended publication, republication as amended, republication as redacted, 
or voluntary publication), 5) assignments of patents and applications and 
6) Information Disclosure Statements. These submissions are itemized on
the USPTO web site, and discussed below. Patent assignment information,
bio-sequence listings, and Information Disclosure Statements may be 
electronically filed for recording and entering with or without a patent 
application. Refer to the EFS user manuals for guidance on the USPTO 
Patents Electronic Business Center Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/ebc.

PART I: UTILITY PATENT APPLICATIONS FILED UNDER THE ELECTRONIC FILING 
SYSTEM 

How are new applications processed under the Electronic Filing System 
(EFS)? 

   The process for handling the EFS applications is shown in Attachment 1 
at the end of this paper. The following is an overview of the process:

A. Applications are "authored" by the applicant/attorney using the 
USPTO-provided EFS-ABX authoring template to put the application into 
special eXtensible Markup Language (XML) formats that can be accurately 
processed by the Office's automated system. With this new EFS-ABX version, 
the specification, claims, abstract and drawings are also put into the 
Portable Document Format (PDF). The word processing templates, which are 
derived from Microsoft Word, allow the user to create an XML patent 
application document with tags that identify the content of each element 
of the specification. For example, one XML tag will identify the title and 
a separate tag will identify the first claim. The PDF version has the 
complete page image, plus the text from the original Word document. 
In EFS-ABX, drawings and complex work units (e.g., math or chemical 
equations, and complex tables) may also be inserted into the template. 
These images will also be included in TIFF format, referenced in the 
document, as explained in the Users Guide. The XML tags created in EFS 
submissions permit the development of automatic application formality 
review processing. EFS-ABX allows the user, at any time during the 
authoring process, to validate the application document to assure that all 
text is properly formatted, all required headings have been inserted, and
images conform to size and format restrictions. The validation process
provides detailed error messages to facilitate correction of any problems 
that arise. Once application files are properly formatted, validated and v
iewed, EFS-ABX exports the document as a set of both XML and PDF files that 
are compliant with the international standard for electronic applications 
specified in the Patent Cooperation Treaty, Administrative Instructions, 
Annex F. These files are compressed and password protected so they cannot 
be altered without re-entering EFS-ABX. 

B. The user then employs the submission software ePAVE (electronic 
packaging and validation engine) to attach the compressed and password 
protected EFS-ABX file package, complete common data elements and required 
forms, attach any desired external files (e.g. oath or sequence listing), 
apply an electronic signature to the application, encrypt the signed 
application, and electronically transmit the application in XML and PDF to 
the USPTO. The electronic signature should be in the /John Smith/ format, 
as indicated in Annex F, and consistent with the proposed changes to 37 CFR 
1.4(d). The electronic signature is will be indicated on the eventual 
official documents stored in the USPTO's Image File Wrapper (IFW) system, 
and is the official signature for the purposes of 37 CFR 1.33. Applicant 
is urged to maintain an electronic copy of this file, similar in concept
to the admonition of 37 CFR 1.4(d)(1)(ii) for fax filings.
 

C. At the USPTO, the electronic files are checked for technical compliance, 
virus infection and integrity. Under normal circumstances, the digital 
signature (part of the public key infrastructure (PKI)) on the document 
package will prove valid, thus assuring that the files were not altered 
from the time they were signed. An electronic Acknowledgement Receipt 
including the Application Number and a Confirmation Number will be produced 
and sent securely to the applicant as proof of a successful submission. The 
Acknowledgement Receipt also lists the files received by the USPTO with the 
name and the size of each file, and includes a unique Message Digest code 
that is derived from the submission. The applicant will retain this
Acknowledgement Receipt as clear evidence that on the date noted the files 
were successfully received by the USPTO. The Acknowledgement Receipt serves 
as an "Electronic Post Card" and is assurance to the applicant in the event 
evidence of filing is ever needed.

   An electronic Acknowledgement Receipt, however, does not guarantee that 
the application meets all the USPTO requirements for a filing date. For 
example, if a non-provisional application submission does not include 
required claims, the filing date will be granted when this omission is 
corrected by applicant. 

   If the files have technical errors, the applicant is immediately alerted 
by a return message that does not include an Acknowledgement Receipt as 
described above. The return message will, instead, indicate to the 
applicant that a problem has occurred. The applicant will be advised to 
contact the USPTO for help. If a filing error message is received, the 
applicant should not simply resubmit the application without resolving the 
cause of the error and contacting the EFS Help Desk. Improper multiple 
submissions that contain authorizations to charge a filing fee may result 
in multiple charges of that fee to the applicant's account. A request for 
a refund will not ordinarily be granted if multiple submissions of the same
application are intentionally transmitted. (If the error occurs after Help 
Desk hours, applicant should consider Express Mail or other alternatives.)

What types of utility applications may be submitted under EFS?

   The Office only accepts certain utility patent applications via EFS. The 
Office does not currently accept by EFS: continued prosecution applications 
(CPAs), design applications, reissue applications, plant applications, 
secrecy order or national security applications, national stage (i.e. '371) 
or international applications. Very large applications (over 100 megabytes 
of compressed data) are accepted only under the compact disc provisions of 
Part IV. All other submissions should use conventional paper media and, 
when appropriate under 37 CFR 1.52(e), compact disc media. Although the 
USPTO permits paper patent applications to be filed in a language other 
than English, applications submitted through the Electronic Filing System 
must be in the English language.

How are applications kept secure during filing? 

   Applications electronically filed under the EFS are submitted using 
special software employing public key infrastructure (PKI) technology. PKI 
software assures the integrity, authenticity, non-repudiation and 
confidentiality of the applications. USPTO security standards are 
commensurate with the state of the art in electronic commerce across the 
Internet. Applications are maintained in confidence as required by 35 USC 
Sec. 122, until the application is published or a patent is issued. 

What is the official submission of the new application under the EFS?

   Currently the official copies of all USPTO electronic application files 
are the electronic images of the EFS submission entered into the Office's 
IFW files. The EFS electronic submission in its original form will be 
maintained under electronic records management control, and will serve as 
a safety copy if needed during prosecution or later. The document images 
stored in the Office's IFW system are the official records used during 
prosecution. The PDF version from EFS-ABX will be used to create the image 
version of the specification (description), drawings, claims and abstract. 
The XML version will create the bibliographic data and 18-Month Publication
text.
 

May a Computer Readable Form (CRF) of Biotechnology Sequence Listings be 
submitted with the EFS? 

   Yes, the EFS may be used to submit the CRF submission required of 
biotechnology applications under 37 CFR 1.821(e) for applications that have 
already been submitted or for new biotechnology applications concurrently 
submitted using EFS. 

May large tables or computer program listing appendices be submitted with 
the EFS? 

   Yes, the submission software enables the electronic filing of such data 
authored in a text (ASCII) format under 37 CFR Sec. 1.58(b) and 1.96. For 
EFS-ABX submissions, tables must be submitted in portrait orientation, 
although landscape orientation is accepted in paper. 

What is the force and effect of the Acknowledgement Receipt sent by the 
USPTO under the EFS? 

   The electronic Acknowledgement Receipt is not the official filing 
receipt for the application. The paper Filing Receipt (37 CFR Sec. 1.54), 
PTO Form-103X, is sent after printing the application in step 8 in 
Attachment 1 below, and reviewing the submitted application parts for 
compliance with 35 U.S.C. Sec. 111 filing date requirements and will 
indicate the official filing date. However, the Acknowledgement Receipt
establishes the date of successful submission of the associated documents, 
and is thus a crucial part of the application process in establishing the 
applicant's filing date. 

What is the value of the Acknowledgement Receipt if a problem occurs?

   If the printed version of any document received by the EFS is 
unreadable, and if it cannot be recovered from the stored files received by 
electronic submission, then the applicant will be promptly notified by 
phone, fax or e-mail as indicated in the EFS instructions. Even with prompt 
processing, if the volume of submissions is high the Office review may take 
place a few days or weeks later. If an error occurs and the application 
cannot be reconstructed, the applicant may have to resubmit the application 
and petition for the original filing date. Such events are expected to be 
rare. Under this scenario, the applicant would present 1) the 
Acknowledgement Receipt, 2) a paper version and an electronic version (on 
floppy disk or CD-R) of the files as submitted and 3) a petition verifying 
that the attached files are the same as mentioned in the Acknowledgement 
Receipt for that application number. The Acknowledgement Receipt will 
establish that the resubmitted documents were exactly those submitted on 
the date of receipt. 

What is the date of receipt of an application received under the EFS?

   The application's "date of receipt" is the date that it is fully and 
successfully received at the USPTO, as shown on the Acknowledgement 
Receipt. The date at the USPTO is controlling for the purposes of original 
patent applications. There is no "certificate of transmission" practice for 
non-provisional or provisional application e-filings (37 CFR 1.8). However, 
because of the automated processes involved, applicants can usually "see" 
their submissions over the Internet in the Private PAIR (Patent Application 
Information Retrieval) system a short time after submission, which is a 
significant reassurance of successful receipt. 

   Hours of operation of the EFS will be clearly expressed in the EFS 
instructions. If a transmission is attempted when the system is down, the 
Office cannot accept it and will, if possible, transmit back a notice that 
the Office is closed. No Acknowledgement Receipt will be sent. The "closed" 
notice will advise the applicant to use alternative filing methods, such as 
hand delivery of paper to the USPTO or Express Mail (under 37 CFR 1.10), to 
establish the filing date. Remember that new applications under 37 CFR 1.53 
cannot be submitted by fax (37 CFR 1.6(d)(3)), and that normal certificate 
of mailing procedures do not apply to new applications (37 CFR 1.8(a)(2)(I)
(A) and (D)). 

   If an application is successfully received on a Saturday, Sunday or 
Holiday, the Office will assign that receipt date at the USPTO to the 
submission, similar to the Express Mail practice under 37 CFR 1.10. 

Are there any legal consequences of the Office's accepting electronic 
patent applications on Saturday and Sunday? 

   The USPTO will be open for receiving applications in electronic form 
during scheduled hours every day of the week. Hours will be announced on 
the Patents Electronic Business Center Web Page, at the USPTO Website: 
http://www.uspto.gov/ebc. Hours for the Help Desk are also posted.

   Electronic filing will provide applicants with the opportunity to 
receive a filing date on any day of the week, including Saturday, Sunday, 
and Federal holidays. In addition, consistent with 35 U.S.C. Sec. 21(b), 
when the last day for taking any action or paying any fee in the USPTO 
falls on Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal holiday within the District of 
Columbia, the action may be taken or fee paid on the next succeeding 
secular or business day. Thus, under United States law, applicants will 
still be permitted to take action on the next business day when the last 
day for taking action falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, regardless of 
the mode or form of filing. 

   Because the conditions for priority rights are governed by national law, 
applicants are cautioned to consider possible adverse consequences 
regarding the determination of priority periods under Article 4(C)(3) of 
the Paris Convention when filing international applications in the United 
States. Specifically, the ability to file applications electronically on 
weekends may result in loss of priority rights in foreign jurisdictions 
designated in international applications filed with the USPTO, if 
applicants elect to take advantage of sections 21(b) or 119(e)(3) of title 
35. In such circumstances, other Patent Offices may deny the priority claim 
on the basis that the international application was not timely filed 
according to their national law. For this reason, applicants may prefer not 
to rely upon the "next business day" provisions of sections 21(b) and 119(e)
(3) of title 35 when filing international applications with the USPTO, and 
instead file the application before the Convention year has expired. 

PART 2: PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATIONS FILED UNDER THE ELECTRONIC FILING 
SYSTEM (EFS) 

   Provisional applications under 35 U.S.C. Sec. 111(b) can be 
electronically authored with EFS-ABX and filed using EFS. The process for 
handling EFS provisional patent applications follows the same process 
outlined in Part 1 of the Legal Framework and in Attachment 1 for new 
utility patent application EFS filings except for the following features of 
the process: 

	A. Provisional application must include the Application Data Sheet 
	(Section 1.76) as the equivalent submission of a cover sheet to 
	provide bibliographic information (i.e., inventor names, 
	correspondence address, etc.). The entry of a customer number for a
	correspondence address will assign to the provisional application 
	the correspondence address associated with the customer number and 
	will enable information about the application to be obtained using 
	the private Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system.

	B. The EFS transmittal form will automatically include information 
	identifying the electronic submission as a provisional application.

	C. If the Provisional Application is subject to U.S. government 
	property interest, an explanation should be entered on the EFS 
	transmittal form comments section. Provisional Applications 
	containing national security related matter must not be 
	electronically filed. 

	D. Payment of the basic provisional filing fee is required. 

	E. The Acknowledgement Receipt returned after a successful 
	electronic filing of a provisional application will contain the 
	USPTO assigned provisional application number and control number.

	F. Provisional Application submissions under EFS will be indexed 
	and sent into the Image File Wrapper (IFW), reviewed for 
	completeness, and a paper Official Filing Receipt will be mailed to 
	the applicant. The Image File Wrapper containing the electronically 
	filed documents (i.e., the provisional application) will not be 
	examined or published. 

	G. Provisional Applications submitted under EFS may be in the 
	English language only. 

   Although the USPTO permits paper patent applications to be filed in a 
language other than English, provisional and non-provisional applications 
submitted through the Electronic Filing System must be in the English 
language. 

PART 3: EIGHTEEN-MONTH PUBLICATION SUBMISSIONS SUBMITTED UNDER THE 
ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM (EFS)

   EFS is also used for the re-submission of patent applications for the 
purposes of Eighteen-Month Publication (i.e., Domestic Publication of 
Patent Applications Published Abroad under P.L. 106-113 or 18 Month 
Publication). See 37 CFR 1.211-1.221 for the relevant rules. 

   Ordinarily, the submitted copy of a patent application is used for the 
production of the Patent Application Publication, as it was amended 14 to 9 
weeks prior to publication date, when it was sent to the publication 
facility. However, if applicant desires one of the following: 

	a) the publication of a redacted copy of an application (37 CFR 
	1.217) or

	b) the publication of the application as specifically amended (37 
	CFR 1.215) or 

	c) the voluntary publication of an application filed before, but 
	pending on November 29, 2000 under 37 CFR 1. 221, or 

	d) a republication under 37 CFR 1.221 of an application previously 
	published under 37 CFR 1.211 (that is not to correct material 
	errors in publication sought to be corrected within 2 months of 
	publication via a paper request) 

   then the application must be submitted in electronic form using the EFS. 
If the applicant requests early publication of the application under 37 CFR 
1.219 he or she may submit an electronic copy using EFS, but EFS 
submissions are currently only capable of use for publication purposes if 
the application is already on file in the USPTO. Accordingly, to obtain 
early publication either file the application on paper or through EFS, and, 
once a confirmation number is obtained (on the Acknowledgement Receipt if 
electronic or the filing receipt if paper), re-submit the application 
using EFS and with a request for early publication. Alternatively, the 
second EFS submission may be eliminated, but publication will be based upon 
a paper version of the application. Early publication requests require 
submission of the publication fee. See 37 CFR 1.219. 

Background: How are submissions handled under the Electronic Filing System 
(EFS) for 18-Month Publication? 

   The process for handling the EFS submission for Eighteen-Month 
publication is shown on Attachment 2 below. Note the following features of 
the process: 

	A. Applications (including plant patent applications) that are 
	submitted for redacted, "as amended," voluntary, "previously 
	published" or, optionally, "early" Patent Application Publications 
	are authored using the USPTO-provided authoring tools as described 
	for new applications above. They must contain a statement that the 
	submission does not include any "new matter." 

	B. Application files, once properly authored in EFS-ABX, are 
	assembled, validated, electronically signed, encrypted, digitally 
	signed, wrapped and electronically transmitted to the USPTO. This 
	is the same process used for new applications described above. The 
	XML version of the application will be used for 18-Month 
	Publication and thus the applicant should review the XML document 
	using Internet Explorer to see the application content that will be 
	published. 

	C. Any publication or processing fees must be made at the time of 
	submission. 

	D. After receipt at the USPTO, the electronic files are checked for 
	technical compliance, freedom from viruses and apparent integrity 
	as described above for new applications. The Eighteen-Month 
	Publication submissions are transferred to the facility that edits, 
	publishes and produces the Published Patent Application documents 
	directly in electronic form. 

Where does the applicant indicate or author the required statement that 
this resubmission of the application contains no new matter? What other 
certifications are effective? 

   The following statement is automatically entered and printed on the 
completed EFS Application Data Sheet for every Eighteen-Month Publication 
electronic submission: 

   "I state that this resubmission of the application contains no new 
matter. If this resubmission is a redacted copy of an application submitted 
under 37 CFR 1.217, the applicant hereby certifies that the redacted copy 
of the application eliminates only the part or description of the invention 
that is not contained in any application filed in a foreign country, 
directly or through a multilateral international agreement, that 
corresponds to the application filed in the Office and otherwise does not 
introduce any new matter. Additionally, if this submission is a redacted 
copy of an application submitted under 37 CFR 1.217, the applicant further
certifies that the documents and certification required by 37 CFR 1.217(c) 
have been filed or will be filed concurrently with the request for redacted 
publication (See 37 CFR 1.217(c))." 

   In accordance with 37 CFR 10.18 (b), by presenting to the Office 
(whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) any paper, 
the party presenting such paper, (whether a practitioner or 
non-practitioner,) is certifying that  -  

   1) All statements made therein of the party's own knowledge are true, 
all statements made therein on information and belief are believed to be 
true, and all statements made therein are made with the knowledge that 
whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the Patent and Trademark 
Office, knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any 
trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or 
fraudulent statements or representations, makes or uses any false writing 
or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent 
statement or entry, shall be subject to the penalties set forth under 18 
U.S.C. 1001, and that violations of this paragraph may jeopardize the 
validity of the application or document. 

   Entry of one electronic signature appearing on the EFS submission 
transmittal will acknowledge all the certification statements contained in 
the EFS submission. 

May the applicant use a certificate of transmission?

   Electronic submissions for Eighteen-Month Publication under EFS of "as 
amended" applications, "voluntary" or "previously published" publications, 
or "early" publications may be submitted with a certificate of 
transmission. Consistent with the certificate practice of 37 CFR 1.8, the 
local date at the place of submission as indicated on the certificate of 
transmission will be considered for the purposes of determining if the 
electronic applications were submitted in a timely manner. This does not 
apply to "redacted" applications submitted under 37 CFR 1.217 that must be 
received on the specified date at the USPTO. 

PART 4: EFS FILING SCENARIO FOR LARGE SUBMISSIONS USING COMPACT DISCS: 

   If the Applicant/Attorney attempts to file a Utility or Provisional 
Patent Application or Eighteen-Month Publication Submission that exceeds 
the EFS system limit of 100 Megabytes of compressed data, the system will 
generate an error message and advise the applicant to submit the large 
application on compact discs (hereinafter CDs or CD-Rs). Submissions 
exceeding 100 MB cannot be forwarded to USPTO over the Internet using 
ePAVE. If a large biotechnology sequence listing, table or computer program 
listing caused the large application size, the applicant may submit the 
application according to the requirements of 37 CFR 1.52 (e) with the large 
section on CD and the rest in paper. However, regardless of the cause of 
the large size of the submission, EFS can also be used to file the 
application in the following manner. The process requires the workstation 
to be connected to a compact disc recorder: 

   The process for handling large submissions is diagramed in Attachment 3. 
Applicant, on creating a large application (>100 Megabytes) will be 
instructed by ePAVE to: 

   1. Print out the Transmittal Form. 

   2. Copy the submission folder containing the whole application from the 
workstation to compact disc-recordable (CD-R) media. Do not use floppy or 
Zip disks or other media. 

   3. Wrap the CD in a hard case within a padded protective mailing 
envelope, attached to the Transmittal Form. Enclose a cover letter 
explaining that the submission contains an application that was too large 
to be submitted under the EFS ePAVE process. 

   4. Hand carry, or mail the CD-R and a copy of the paper Transmittal 
Form, with the cover letter to the USPTO, or deposit them with the US 
Postal Service under the Express Mail procedures of 37 CFR 1.10. 

   Applicant is advised to keep a copy of the CD and transmittal form for 
his or her records. In step 2 above, an applicant may optionally make a 
backup copy of the CD and send in both copies to the USPTO. Label the CDs 
"Copy 1" and "Copy 2" and include a signed statement that the two copies 
are identical. Copy 1 will be used for processing, unless it is unreadable. 
Applicant is advised to electronically "compare" the file on the CD with 
the files on the computer to be sure of accuracy. 

   The USPTO will receive the application package in the mailroom. The date 
of receipt of the application will be recorded. The CD will be "uploaded" 
to the EFS server. The application files will then be processed as EFS 
submissions. 

   If the submission was a new application (as opposed to a submission of 
a copy of an application under 18-Month Publication), an Acknowledgement 
Form will be printed. However, the Acknowledgement Form will be modified 
to indicate that the USPTO mail room date of receipt of the CDs, or the 
Express Mail date when they were submitted to the USPS, is the date of 
their receipt (the date of uploading to the server will NOT be used). The 
Acknowledgement Form is placed in the file with the printed application, 
and a copy of the Acknowledgement Form is sent back to the applicant. A 
certificate of mailing may be used in the same manner as the certificate of 
transmission described above. 

   If the files contain large tables, sequence listings or computer program 
listings, the Office has the option of not printing the large files, but 
rather burning two CD-Rs of such data, and treating them under the CD 
practice of 37 CFR 1.52(e). If the file is an amino acid/nucleotide 
sequence listing, then one additional copy of such a sequence listing will 
be created and used as the CRF. In any case, one CD is placed in the file, 
and one is put in the CD repository. 

   In other respects, processing will continue as if the application had 
been submitted by the standard EFS channel. 

   If an application is too large to use this process successfully (about 
and over 1 Gigabyte) then please contact the Patent Electronic Business 
Center (www.uspto.gov/ebc). Some applications may be too big to process 
using the CD techniques and require special handling.

What is Receipt Date for EFS New Utility or Provisional Application Filing 
submitted on CD? 

   The Filing Date of any EFS New Utility or Provisional Application sent 
in by CD (in a "CD package," including a paper copy of the ePAVE 
Transmittal form) will be based on the date the CD package is received at 
USPTO, if delivered by hand or regular US mail. That date will be indicated 
in any acknowledgment. If the CD package was sent to the USPTO by Express 
Mail under 37 CFR 1.10, then the date of deposit with the United States 
Postal Service will be used. 

What is the official copy of the Sequence Listing (1.821 (c)), Table, 
Program Listing? 

   For applications that are originally filed using EFS, the copy of the 
specification that is placed in the Image File Wrapper is the official 
copy, with one exception. Sequence listings, large tables, and computer 
program listings may be submitted on CD media, according to 37 CFR 1.52(e). 
If the Office decides, in a particular instance, to copy a sequence listing 
file, computer program listing or large table onto CDs instead of printing 
it to paper, the CDs become the official copy. See Notification of United 
States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Application Records being Stored 
and Processed in Electronic Form, 1271 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 100 (June 17, 
2003). 

   By "official" the Office means the active authoritative copy. The 
electronic submission will be maintained as an evidentiary copy of what was 
submitted should any questions arise during prosecution or later. 

   May an applicant submit more than one copy of the CD to assure 
readability? 

   Applicant is required to submit only one EFS New Utility Application CD. 
However, applicant has the option of submitting a second copy of the CD, 
but must label the two copies "Copy 1" and "Copy 2", and certify that Copy 
1 and Copy 2 are the same. Copy 1 would be used for processing, unless it 
is unreadable. 

Will Express Mail - submission of EFS New Utility Application CD be 
accepted? 

   Yes, if it exceeds the 100 megabytes compressed data limit. 

Should applicant be advised to do a file size comparison between encrypted 
files copied to EFS New Utility Application CD and the EFS files residing 
on the applicant's workstation? 

   Yes, the EFS Guide will advise applicants to do a file comparison. 

PART V: INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS FILED UNDER THE ELECTRONIC FILING 
SYSTEM 

Background: How are Information Disclosure Statements (IDS) processed under 
the Electronic Filing System (EFS)?

   Information Disclosure Statements (IDS), except those filed under 37 CFR 
1.99, may be electronically submitted to the United States Patent and 
Trademark Office (USPTO or Office) via the Office's Electronic Filing 
System (EFS). When making such an EFS submission of an IDS, paper copies of 
U.S. patents and U.S. application publications cited in the IDS will no 
longer have to be supplied by applicants. Applicants file an electronic IDS 
by (1) entering the references' citation information in an electronic data 
entry form, equivalent to the paper PTO-1449 form; and (2) transmitting the 
electronic data entry form data to the Office via ePAVE. Electronic 
submissions under 37 CFR 1.99 (third party submissions) will not be 
accepted. 

What documents may be cited on an electronic Information Disclosure 
Statement (eIDS)? 

   This electronic form allows only citations for U.S. patents and U.S. 
patent application publications. 

How does the applicant meet the requirement under 37 CFR 1.98 to submit 
copies of cited documents? 

   Applicants will NOT submit copies of any U.S. patent or U.S. patent 
application publications cited on an electronic IDS form that is 
electronically transmitted to the Office. 

How are Information Disclosure Statements with foreign patent documents or 
non-patent literature documents or unpublished U.S. applications filed?

   If any references to foreign patent documents, non-patent literature 
documents or unpublished U.S. applications are to be cited, applicants will 
submit those citations on a conventional paper PTO-1449 form (or revised 
form PTO/SB/08). A printed copy of each cited foreign patent document, 
non-patent literature document and unpublished U.S. application (until 
further notice) should accompany the conventional IDS form. Submissions of 
these documents may be made by mail, facsimile transmission, or hand 
delivery. 

What data is entered in an electronic Information Disclosure Statement 
(eIDS)? 

   The ePAVE software provides an electronic data entry IDS form equivalent 
to a paper PTO-1449, Information Disclosure Statement form, in which 
citations for up to 50 U.S. patents and up to 50 U.S. patent application 
publications may be entered. Each citation requires the patent or 
application number, the name of the patentee or applicant, and the date of 
issue or publication. The filer may optionally add the kind code, and U.S. 
patent class and subclass code for each citation. 

How are certifications and statements of relevance required under 37 CFR 
1.97(e) submitted with an eIDS? 

   The electronic IDS form contains preprinted certification statements 
that allow the user to click on one of the two certifications required 
under 37 CFR 1.97(e), regarding citation of the documents in a 
communication from a foreign patent Office and knowledge of the cited 
documents by individuals under 37 CFR 1.56(c). The electronic IDS form also 
contains a free form text area to allow the user to include statements of 
relevance or other remarks with regard to the cited documents.

How are fees submitted? 

   Since the Non-Patent Literature (NPL), unpublished patent applications 
and foreign patent documents are to be submitted in paper, while the US 
patents and published applications are indicated on the electronic IDS, the 
total IDS may be separated into multiple submissions. Generally a single 
fee will suffice. The fee under 37 CFR 1.97(c) must be included with the 
first electronic submission of the electronic IDS. Subsequent submissions 
of the non-electronic documents will not require a fee if they are received 
on the same date that the electronic IDS is received by the Office or were 
deposited in Express Mail, deposited in the first class U.S. mail with a 
certificate of mailing in accordance with 37 CFR 1.8, or transmitted by 
facsimile on the same day with a certificate of transmission in accordance 
with 37 CFR 1.8 on the same date as the electronic IDS that contained the 
fee. The non-electronic submission must make reference to the electronic
IDS.

Details of the fee process are described in the documentation of the EFS 
at www.uspto.gov/ebc. 

How does the IDS data get sent to the Office? 

   The ePAVE software validates the format of data entered into the 
electronic IDS form and allows the applicant to specify whether the 
electronic IDS form is to be linked to an accompanying new application 
filing or is being submitted for a previously filed application. ePAVE 
transmits the XML formatted IDS data from the electronic data entry form to 
the Office. 

   As with the other types of electronic submissions, ePAVE will validate 
the information, display it to the filer, prompt for the filer's electronic 
signature, use the filer's digital certificate to encrypt the whole 
package, and transmit the submission to the USPTO. Upon receipt, the Office 
will send to the filer an electronic post card "Acknowledgement Receipt" 
indicating the date of receipt, the message digest, the application number, 
and the names, types, and sizes of the files received by the USPTO.

Is it possible to submit an eIDS subsequent to filing an application, and, 
if so, how is any necessary fee flagged? 

   The IDS may be submitted as part of a new utility EFS electronic 
application filing, or as a subsequent submission for a previously filed 
patent application. The ePAVE program will prompt the filer to associate an 
IDS file with a new application file and to provide payment information, 
where either is appropriate. 

   If the IDS submission is subsequent to the application filing, the filer 
will be required to enter both an application number and a confirmation 
number. A confirmation number is an additional four-digit identifier 
assigned to an application, and can be found on the Acknowledgement Receipt 
and in the upper left-hand corner of the official filing receipt. An IDS 
cannot be electronically transmitted prior to an initial filing.

How is the eIDS treated by the Office? 

   The IDS form submitted electronically will be placed in the Office's 
IFW. The cited document numbers will be made available electronically to 
the examiner to facilitate searching and retrieval of U.S. patents and U.S. 
application publications. 

   The IDS form will be entered as a document into the application file 
indicating that it was received on the date the form was completely 
received via EFS. This is the date the Office will use in considering 
compliance with 37 CFR Secs. 1.97 and 1.98. This document will be treated 
procedurally the same as any other paper in the file, and will be available 
to any party viewing the contents of the file. 

   Examiners will consider the U.S. patents and U.S. patent application 
publications cited on an electronic IDS form provided the remaining 
requirements of 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98 are met, by reviewing electronic or 
printed copies produced from the Office electronic databases. Examiners 
will indicate which documents were considered by initialing and dating the 
paper copy of the eIDS form, and supplying a copy to the applicant with the 
next Office action, just as with conventional IDS submissions.

What if the applicant transcribes the document numbers incorrectly into the 
eIDS? 

   It is most important that the cited U.S. patent and patent application 
publication numbers be accurate. Because the IDS filer will not submit 
copies of cited documents, there will be no copies of the disclosed 
documents in the file wrapper for the examiner to review. Instead, the 
examiner will electronically retrieve the patents and application 
publications identified bythe cited document numbers.

   The only mechanism for having the correct document reviewed and 
considered when an erroneous U.S. patent or application publication number 
is cited in an IDS citation will be by citing the correct citation number 
in a subsequent IDS that conforms to the requirements of 37 CFR 1.97 and 
1.98. 

For further information: 

   For further information, consult the EFS documentation on the USPTO 
Patents Electronic Business Center web page which includes a complete 
description of the EFS process and procedures. It is located on the 
Internet at http://www.uspto.gov/ebc 

   If there are any questions on the Legal Framework, please contact Jay 
Lucas at jay.lucas@uspto.gov. Questions on the EFS system should be 
directed to the Patent Electronic Business Center at 
http://www.uspto.gov/ebc or via email at ebc@uspto.gov Correspondence may 
also be addressed to Jay Lucas, United States Patent and Trademark Office, 
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.

August 18, 2004					  	   STEPHEN G. KUNIN
					     Deputy Commissioner for Patent 
							 Examination Policy


</pre>
	<center>
	<br/>
	<img src="attachment-1.gif" alt="OG notice image for attachment 1">
	<br/>
	<img src="attachment-2.gif" alt="OG notice image for attachment 2">
	<br/>
	<img src="attachment-3.gif" alt="OG notice image for attachment 3">
	<br/>
	</center>
</pre>
