Date		Type of		Proceeding			
Issued		Case (1)	or App'n No. 		Party/Parties

9-30		OPP		96/116,821		Central Mfg. Inc.
							v. Astec 
							Industries, Inc.

10-1		EX		76214245		Lockheed Martin 
		EX		76214246		Corp.

10-3		EX		76376622		Consulting 
							Services 
							Int'l. Inc.


				Opposer's/		Applicant's/
				Petitioner's		Respondent's
		TTAB		Mark and		Mark and
Issue		Decision	Goods/Services		Goods/Services

2(d); 		Opposition 	"STEALTH" 		"STEALTH" 
2(e)(1); 	Dismissed 	[rakes and 		[asphalt paving 
whether 	on the 		shovels used for 	machine]
applicant 	merits; 	asphalt paving 
had 		and 		and other goods 
bona fide 	judgment 	and services]
intention 	entered 
to use its 	against 
mark as of 	opposer as 
the filing 	a sanction 
date of its 	for abuse 
application; 	of Rule 11
fraud; 
ownership 
of the mark

2(e)(1)		Refusal 				"ETOC" and "eTOC" 
		Affirmed 				[both marks for 
		in both 				computer software 
		cases					for use in 
							acquiring, 
							integrating, and 
							disseminating 
							information to 
							individuals 
							involved in 
							situational 
							response 
							activities]

2(d)		Refusal 				"CRMS" 
		Reversed				[providing an 
							on-line database 
							in the field of 
							ocean shipping 
							contract carrier 
							rates to 
							subscribers]


Mark and					Citable as
Goods Cited by			                Precedent
Examining Atty.					of TTAB

						No

						No

"CRMS" 						No
[software, namely, 
software for 
locating, controlling 
and scheduling the use 
of electronic 
resources that are 
used to receive and 
transmit information 
and data, the 
information and data 
including video 
signals, audio signals 
and human and 
machine-readable data]


(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT 
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION; (MD)=MOTION
TO DISMISS; (MR)=MOTION TO REOPEN
