Date            Type of         Proceeding
Issued          Case (1)        or App'n No.            Party/Parties

3-30            EX              75/392,138              Sharp Kabushiki
                                                        Kaisha

3-30            EX              75/592,344              Solar Protective
                                                        Factory, Inc.

3-30            CU              1014                    Fare Deals Ltd. v.
                                                        Fare Deal Travel v.
                                                        Fare Deals, Inc.

                                Opposer's/              Applicant's/
                                Petitioner's            Respondent's
                TTAB            Mark and                Mark and
Issue           Decision        Goods/Services          Goods/Services

2(e)(1)         Refusal                                 "SCANNING STATION"
                Affirmed                                [personal computer
                                                        software for
                                                        imaging scanners]

2(e)(1)         Refusal                                 "SPF"
                Affirmed                                [chemical additive
                                                        used in the
                                                        manufacture of
                                                        textile products]

whether         Applicant                               "FARE DEALS LTD."
applicant       found to be                             [travel agency
established     entitled to                             services, namely,
its right to a  concurrent                              arranging travel
concurrent use  use                                     tours for others-
registration    registration                            for the area
for the         for the area                            comprising the
geographic      claimed in                              entire United
area claimed    its in its                              States east of the
application     application                             Mississippi River]

Mark and                                        Citable as
Goods Cited by                                  Precedent
Examining Atty.                                 of TTAB

                                                No

                                                No

                                                No

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION; (MD)=MOTION
TO DISMISS; (MR)=MOTION TO REOPEN