Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
11-3 OPP 104,343 Holmquist v.
(SJ) 104,344 Synergy Re-
habilitation,
Inc.
11-3 EX 75/186,844 ZD Inc.
11-3 OPP 99,676 Food-Tek, Inc. v.
CANC 24,523 Rhodia, Inc.
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
2(d) Opposition "SYNERGY PHYSICAL "SYNERGY.
Sustained THERAPY" WORKING TOGETHER
(in both [physical therapy WORKS" and
cases) services] "SYNERGY
[Opposer's REHABILITATION,
motion for INC."
summary judg- (and design)
ment granted [both marks for
in both physical, occu-
cases] pational and
speech therapy]
2(e)(1) Refusal "PC SHOPPER"
Affirmed [providing
multiple-user
access to a global
computer informa-
tion network
featuring news and
information about
computers, com-
puting, systems,
technology and
information net-
works; providing
on-line informa-
tion about com-
puters, computing,
systems, tech-
nology and infor-
mation networks
via a global
computer
network]
2(d) Oppositon "FOOD-TEK" "YOUR FOOD TECH
Dismissed; (used as a trade PARTNER"
Petition to name) [consulting (in stylized
Cancel Denied services in the lettering) and
field of food "YOUR FOOD TECH
manufacturing and PARTNER"
food product [both marks for
research and providing informa-
development] tion regarding
food ingredient
use]
Mark and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
No
No
No
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION