Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
10-19 OPP 103,832 Maylon E. Dickey
v. Metro
Industries
10-20 OPP 101,650 Nabisco, Inc. v.
(R) Sathers Inc.
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
2(d) Opposition "E.C.O." "E.C.G.
Sustained [chemical-free ENVIRONMENTAL
absorbent granular CLEANING
mixture of baked GRANULES"
clay and silicon (in stylized
sand for use by lettering)
home owners, com- [cleaning prepara-
mercial business tions, namely,
establishments, chemical free
highway depart- granular absorbent
ments and fire material of baked
departments in clay for use with
cleaning oil and patented cleaning
grease spills on equipment for
asphalt and con- absorption of
crete surfaces] liquid substances
to include, but
not limited to,
oils, grease,
transmission
fluid, hydraulic
fluid and
anti-freeze]
2(e)(1); Request for "TANGY FRUITS"
genericness; Reconsidera- [candy]
whether tion Denied
applicant's [Opposition
mark has Dismissed
acquired dis- (based on
tinctiveness findings of
under Section non-generic-
2(f) ness and
acquired
distinctive-
ness of
applicant's
mark)]
Mark and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
No
No
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION