Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
10-5 CANC 25,559 Physicians Health
Plan, Inc. v.
Michigan HMO
Plans, Inc.
10-6 EX 75/250,802 Daniel Malley
10-6 EX 75/171,503 New Life
Treatment
Centers, Inc.
10-6 OPP 98,231 Dayton Hudson
Corp. v. Greatland
Corp.
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
2(d); Petition butterfly design butterfly design
affirmative to Cancel [underwriting [health care
defenses of Granted of health and services in the
laches and accident insur- nature of a health
estoppel ance] maintenance
organization]
2(e)(1) Refusal "PRETZEL-BAR"
Affirmed [candy]
2(e)(1) Refusal "WOMEN OF FAITH"
Reversed [audio tapes and
video tapes
featuring inspira-
tional and
religious presen-
tations for women]
2(d) Opposition "TARGET GREATLAND" "GREATLAND" and
Dismissed and "GREATLAND"
"TARGET GREATLAND" (and design)
(and design) [both marks for:
[retail department computer software
store services]; for financial/
"GREATLAND" banking and mort-
[clothing; propane gage institutions
camp stoves and and accounting/
cooking pots, tax, real estate
etc.; sheets, and legal fields,
etc.; processed etc.; printed
nuts, fruit informational
juices, and fruit publications for
drinks, etc.] the same fields;
general printing
services, etc.
Mark and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
No
No
No
No
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION