Date Type of Proceeding Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties 4-30 EX 75/031,114 Hinkle-Washington Joint Venture 4-30 OPP 86,368 Seattle Pacific Industries, Inc. v. Brieland Professional Graphics, Ltd. 4-30 EX 75/143,885 Family Images, Inc. Opposer's/ Applicant's/ Petitioner's Respondent's TTAB Mark and Mark and Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services 2(e)(1) Refusal "DRIVER-ID" Affirmed [anti-theft alarms for vehicles] 2(d) Opposition "HEET" "DRY HEAT" Sustained [clothing and [imprinted sports- sportswear gar- wear, namely, ments, namely, shirts, tank tops, jeans, blouses, sweatshirts, t- shirts, jackets, shirts and caps] slacks, pants, tee-shirts, and sweaters]; "HEET" (in stylized lettering) [clothing and sportswear gar- ments, namely, shirts, slacks, pants, blouses, jackets, tee- shirts, sweaters, jeans, and hats] 2(d) Refusal "FAMILY STORIES- Affirmed CELEBRATING FAMILY HERITAGE" (and design) [providing cus- tomized videos for others] Mark and Citable as Goods Cited by Precedent Examining Atty. of TTAB No No "THE FAMILY No STORIES COMPANY" [videotape production of keepsake videos] (1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION