Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
4-30 EX 75/031,114 Hinkle-Washington
Joint Venture
4-30 OPP 86,368 Seattle Pacific
Industries, Inc.
v. Brieland
Professional
Graphics, Ltd.
4-30 EX 75/143,885 Family Images, Inc.
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
2(e)(1) Refusal "DRIVER-ID"
Affirmed [anti-theft alarms
for vehicles]
2(d) Opposition "HEET" "DRY HEAT"
Sustained [clothing and [imprinted sports-
sportswear gar- wear, namely,
ments, namely, shirts, tank tops,
jeans, blouses, sweatshirts, t-
shirts, jackets, shirts and caps]
slacks, pants,
tee-shirts, and
sweaters];
"HEET"
(in stylized
lettering)
[clothing and
sportswear gar-
ments, namely,
shirts, slacks,
pants, blouses,
jackets, tee-
shirts, sweaters,
jeans, and hats]
2(d) Refusal "FAMILY STORIES-
Affirmed CELEBRATING
FAMILY HERITAGE"
(and design)
[providing cus-
tomized videos
for others]
Mark and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
No
No
"THE FAMILY No
STORIES COMPANY"
[videotape production
of keepsake videos]
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION