Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
12-4 OPP 87/789 Neostrata Co.,
(R) Inc. and Herald
Pharmacal, Inc.
v. Neoteric
Cosmetics, Inc.
12-4 OPP 96,518 Recot, Inc.
v. M. C. Becton
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
genericness; Request for "ALPHA HYDROX"
2(e)(1); Reconsider- [skin lotions]
whether ation Denied
applicant's [Opposition
mark is Dismissed
registrable (registration
under Section under
2(f) Sec. 2(f)
[On request permitted);
for recon- decision will
sideration, not be marked
opposer asks as "citable
that decision precedent"]
be marked as
"citable
precedent"]
2(d) Opposition "FRITO-LAY" et al. "FIDO LAY"
Dismissed [potato chips, [edible dog
corn chips, and a treats]
variety of other
food items]
Mark and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
No
Yes
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION