Date Type of Proceeding Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties 12-4 OPP 87/789 Neostrata Co., (R) Inc. and Herald Pharmacal, Inc. v. Neoteric Cosmetics, Inc. 12-4 OPP 96,518 Recot, Inc. v. M. C. Becton Opposer's/ Applicant's/ Petitioner's Respondent's TTAB Mark and Mark and Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services genericness; Request for "ALPHA HYDROX" 2(e)(1); Reconsider- [skin lotions] whether ation Denied applicant's [Opposition mark is Dismissed registrable (registration under Section under 2(f) Sec. 2(f) [On request permitted); for recon- decision will sideration, not be marked opposer asks as "citable that decision precedent"] be marked as "citable precedent"] 2(d) Opposition "FRITO-LAY" et al. "FIDO LAY" Dismissed [potato chips, [edible dog corn chips, and a treats] variety of other food items] Mark and Citable as Goods Cited by Precedent Examining Atty. of TTAB No Yes (1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION