Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
9-10 EX 74/731,211 Fisheye, Inc.
9-10 EX 74/677,288 FMC Corp.
9-10 EX 74/490,595 Timothy J. Sheehan
9-11 OPP 96,404 The Goodyear Tire
and Rubber Co. v.
Interco Tire Corp.
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
Sec. 6 Refusal "FISHEYE"
disclaimer Affirmed (and fish design)
requirement [underwater video
(of word cameras]
"FISHEYE")
"ALSTAR"
2(d) Refusal (and design)
Affirmed [traps, namely,
bait stations
containing an
oxidative phos-
phorylation
uncoupler for at-
tracting and kil-
ling ants]
2(e)(3) Refusal "CUBITA"
Reversed [coffee]
de jure Opposition configuration of
function- Sustained the tread design
ality; (but only on of a tire asserted
acquired the grounds as a trademark for
distinc- of lack of applicant's tires
tiveness acquired dis-
[under tinctiveness)
Sec. 2(f)]
Mark and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
No
"ALL STAR" No
[pesticides, namely,
bug and ant killing
compositions for
institutional and
industrial use];
"ALLSTAR"
(and design)
[janitorial preparations
for institutional and
industrial use, namely,
pesticides]
No
No
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION