Summary of Final Decisions Issued by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board August 27-21, 1998 Date Type of Proceeding Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties 8-20 OPP 87,789 Neostrata Co., Inc. and Herald Phar- macal, Inc. v. Neoteric Cosmetics, Inc. 8-20 EX 74/676,406 Image Sciences, Inc. 8-20 OPP 95,866 The Mead CANC 23,395 Corp. v. Lisa Frank, Inc. Opposer's/ Applicant's/ Petitioner's Respondent's TTAB Mark and Mark and Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services genericness; Opposition "ALPHA 2(e)(1); Dismissed HYDROX" whether [registration [skin applicant's under lotions] mark is reg- Sec. 2(f) istrable permitted] under Section 2(f) 2(d) Refusal "DOCUWORKS" Affirmed [computer software utility programs for document crea- tion, production and manufacture, namely, file transfer identifi- cation, conversion from one font to another and graphic enablers] 2(d) Opposition "RAINBOW" "RAINBOW REEF" Dismissed; [paper tablets] [stationery-type Petition for "RAINBOW" portfolios, note- partial can- [school and sta- books, writing cellation tionery products, tablets, memo pads denied including paper and stickers] tablets] "RAINBOW CHASER" [notebooks, folders, binders, and stationery] Mark and Citable as Goods Cited by Precedent Examining Atty. of TTAB No "DOCWORX" No [computer software used in the appli- cation of document management and document image processing, and computer hardware and peripherals in a networked communication environment, including laser printers, image scanners, computer processing units, optical disc juke boxes, monitors and related in- struction manuals sold as a unit] No (1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION