Type Proceeding Date of or Party/ Issued Case (1) App'n No. Parties 2-24 EX 74/664,809 Phil Posthuma and Cordell Langeland 2-26 EX 74/448,220 Carmen D. Caserta 2-26 CANC 24,090 In-Flight Phone Corp. v. J. Anselmo, Inc. Opposer's/ Applicant's/ Petitioner's Respondent's TTAB Mark and Mark and Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services whether the Refusal "PHANTASM" matter sought Affirmed [entertainment to be regis- services in the tered func- nature of live tions as a theater produc- service mark tion] for the serv- ices recited in the appli- cation or functions, instead, only as the title of a single crea- tive work whether, as Refusal "FURR-BALL evidenced by Affirmed FURCANIA" the specimens [children's books of record, and periodical the matter publications, sought to be namely, comic registered strips and comic functions as magazines] a trademark for the goods identified in the applica- tion or func- tions, in- stead, only as a ficti- tious char- acter name whether reg- Petition to "SKY LIMO" istrant had Cancel (and design) used its mark Granted [transportation of in commerce (but only on passengers by as of the is- the ground of limousine, vans, sue date of non-use of buses and cars] its registra- the mark as tion; fraud of the date of registra- tion) Mark and Citable as Goods Cited by Precedent Examining Atty. of TTAB Yes Yes No (1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION