%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>/Metadata 58 0 R/Pages 2 0 R/StructTreeRoot 59 0 R/Type/Catalog>>
endobj
58 0 obj
<>stream
2001-11-27T17:58:06Z
POP90
2011-01-31T15:10:20-05:00
2011-01-31T15:10:20-05:00
Corel PDF Engine Version 9.320
application/pdf
uuid:255e5740-068e-45e7-84ec-d043c2decaaf
uuid:fabf17e3-8cf4-40d1-bab7-83413cf8ecab
endstream
endobj
2 0 obj
<>
endobj
59 0 obj
<>
endobj
60 0 obj
<>/CM10<>/CM11<>/CM12<>/CM13<>/CM14<>/CM15<>/CM16<>/CM17<>/CM18<>/CM19<>/CM2<>/CM20<>/CM21<>/CM22<>/CM23<>/CM24<>/CM25<>/CM26<>/CM27<>/CM28<>/CM29<>/CM3<>/CM31<>/CM4<>/CM5<>/CM6<>/CM7<>/CM8<>/CM9<>>>
endobj
80 0 obj
<>
endobj
81 0 obj
<>
endobj
82 0 obj
<>5]/P 86 0 R/Pg 39 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
83 0 obj
<>2]/P 87 0 R/Pg 47 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
84 0 obj
<>/P 88 0 R/Pg 39 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
85 0 obj
<>/P 89 0 R/Pg 47 0 R/S/Link>>
endobj
89 0 obj
<>
endobj
47 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Tabs/S/Type/Page>>
endobj
91 0 obj
[55 0 R]
endobj
92 0 obj
<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
q
1 0 0 -1 72 127.6799927 cm
0 0 0 rg
0 0 m
143.76 0 l
143.76 0.84 l
0 0.84 l
f*
Q
BT
0 0 0 rg
/T1_0 1 Tf
0.02 Tw 3 Tr 9 0 0 9 72 108.24 Tm
( )Tj
ET
q
1 0 0 -1 507.2400055 107.1600037 cm
0 0 m
9.6 0 l
9.6 0.72 l
0 0.72 l
f*
Q
q
1 0 0 -1 312.6000061 494.2799988 cm
0 0 m
12.72 0 l
12.72 0.72 l
0 0.72 l
f*
Q
q
1 0 0 -1 402.4799957 386.2799988 cm
0 0 m
15.36 0 l
15.36 0.72 l
0 0.72 l
f*
Q
q
1 0 0 -1 139.9199982 218.2799988 cm
0 0 m
12 0 l
12 0.72 l
0 0.72 l
f*
Q
q
1 0 0 -1 157.9199982 218.2799988 cm
0 0 m
119.64 0 l
119.64 0.72 l
0 0.72 l
f*
Q
q
1 0 0 -1 183.3600006 170.2799988 cm
0 0 m
214.2 0 l
214.2 0.72 l
0 0.72 l
f*
Q
BT
/Span <<>>BDC
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tw 0 Tr 12 0 0 12 301.56 711.48 Tm
(4.\036 )Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
-16.13 -1.995 Td
(In its principal brief, Ellsworth maintains that he does not have to est\
ablish conception of )Tj
-3 -2 Td
[(the invention defined by all of Ellsworth claims 1-15 to prevail. )-250(We now )]TJ
EMC
/Link <<>>BDC
(agree.)Tj
EMC
/StyleSpan <<>>BDC
0.0172 Tc 6.96 0 0 6.96 455.04 668.34 Tm
(12 )Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
0.005 Tc -0.005 Tw 12 0 0 12 108 639.54 Tm
[(Ellsworth would hav)88(e been entitled a)86( patent containing)96( those claims for w)85(hich he could )]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw -2.995 -1.995 Td
[(have established sole inventorship. )-250(If he had established sole inventorship for the subject matter )]TJ
0 -2 TD
(of all 15 claims, then a patent should be issued to Ellsworth with 15 cl\
aims and all claims of the )Tj
0.005 Tc -0.005 Tw T*
[(Ellsworth and Moor)85(e patent should be)84( cancelled. 35 U.)88(S.C. \247 135\(a\). On the)92( other hand, if )]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw 0.005 -2 Td
(Ellsworth would have established sole inventorship with respect to only \
some of the claims, then )Tj
T*
(any patent issued to Ellsworth should be limited to those claims and cor\
responding claims in the )Tj
T*
(Ellsworth and Moore patent should be cancelled. )Tj
EMC
/StyleSpan <<>>BDC
20.05 0 Td
(Id. )Tj
EMC
/Span <<>>BDC
-0.93 -3.02 Td
(5. )Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
-16.13 -2 Td
(Ellsworth continues to argue in the principal brief, that some effect sh\
ould be given to the )Tj
-3 -2 Td
[(fact that the Rule 608\(b\) showing was said to be "sufficient." )-250(To put this argument to bed once )]TJ
0.005 Tc -0.005 Tw 0 -1.995 TD
[(and for all, Ellswo)88(rth was advised th)84(at the Rule 608\(b\))84( showing was )]TJ
EMC
/StyleSpan <<>>BDC
0 Tc 0 Tw 27.54 0 Td
(not)Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
0.005 Tc -0.005 Tw 1.28 -0.005 Td
[( considered on its m)85(erits, )]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw -28.82 -2 Td
[(because it was not necessary \(Paper 49, pag)85(e 14, Part \(3\)\). Once it was determined that )]TJ
0 -2 TD
[(Ellsworth was entitled to a "priority" benefit filing date which is the \
same a)84(s the filing date of the )]TJ
0 -1.995 TD
(Ellsworth and Moore application, the Rule 608\(b\) showing became a "sid\
e-show" and )Tj
0 -2 TD
(unnecessary in this case. )Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
3 -2 Td
(For completeness, we will note that even if the Rule 608\(b\) showing ha\
d been determined )Tj
-0.01 Tc 0.01 Tw -3 -2 Td
[(to be "suffi)-87(cient" by a singl)-89(e judge, that)-94( determinat)-93(ion would n)-92(ot be bindi)-92(ng on a three-)-84(judge )]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw T*
(merits panel. )Tj
EMC
/StyleSpan <<>>BDC
0.005 Tc 5.66 0 Td
(Cf)Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
0 Tc 1 -0.005 Td
(. )Tj
EMC
/StyleSpan <<>>BDC
(Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc.)Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
10.47 0 Td
(, 203 F.3d 782, 785 n.2, 53 USPQ2d 1765, 1767 n.2 )Tj
-17.13 -2 Td
[(\(Fed. Cir. 2000\) \(decision by a single Federa)84(l Circuit motions judge as not being binding on a )]TJ
0.005 Tc -0.005 Tw 0.005 -2 Td
[(Federal Circui)84(t panel\); )]TJ
EMC
/StyleSpan <<>>BDC
0 Tc 0 Tw 9.28 0 Td
(Thomson v. Merit Systems Protection Board)Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
17.845 0 Td
(, 772 F.2d 879, 882 n.5 \(Fed. )Tj
-27.13 -2 Td
(Cir. 1985\) \(same\). )Tj
EMC
/StyleSpan <<>>BDC
0.0843 Tc 4.98 0 0 4.98 84 111.96 Tm
(12)Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
0.02 Tc 9 0 0 9 89.76 108.24 Tm
[( As noted above, the )150(re was a time in the)-116( interference)-115( when the boar )158(d felt that Ellsworth ha )156(d to prevail as to )]TJ
EMC
/StyleSpan <<>>BDC
46.387 0 Td
(all)Tj
EMC
/P <<>>BDC
1.067 0 Td
( of )Tj
0.04 Tc -0.02 Tw -49.427 -1.06 Td
[(claims 1-)114(15 to preva)112(il in t)112(he interfer)117(ence. )]TJ
EMC
ET
EMC
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 12 0 0 12 293.04 75.48 Tm
(- 18 \255)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
56 0 obj
<>
endobj
93 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
94 0 obj
<>stream
Hl0z6%ݮ6{A@TPCFsWỤ>>{VW0VޯۛT?(pݨ(_[?̿_ŗWEx-ȅܧWmx|rӳXYQ"J5?^&yvEcUMϘ