Type            Proceeding
Date            of              or                      Party/
Issued          Case (1)        App'n No.               Parties

11-6            CU              1,012                   Dynamark Security
                                                        Centers, Inc. v.
                                                        Intruder Alert
                                                        Systems of San
                                                        Antonio, Inc.

11-6            OPP             95,834                  Intelligent Sports
                                                        Inc. v. Randy
                                                        Buller


                                Opposer's/              Applicant's/
                                Petitioner's            Respondent's
                TTAB            Mark and                Mark and
Issue           Decision        Goods/Services          Goods/Services

whether the     Concurrent      "S.A.F.E. SECURITY      "SAFE/SECURITY
concurrent      use regis-      AFFORDABLE FOR          ALARMS FOR EVERY-
use applicant   tration         EVERYONE"               ONE"
established     granted         [leasing of secur-      [burglar alarms]
its entitle-                    ity systems for         (limited to San
ment to a                       residential and         Antonio, Texas and
concurrent                      commercial use]         four surrounding
use registra-                   (for all of the         counties)
tion for its                    U.S. except for
claimed ter-                    San Antonio, Texas
ritory                          and four surround-
                                ing counties)

2(d)            Opposition      "THE SPORTS             "PARTS
                Dismissed       AUTHORITY,"             AUTHORITY"
                                "THE LOW PRICE          [retail store ser-
                                AUTHORITY" et al.       vices and distri-
                                [retail store ser-      butorship services
                                vices featuring a       dealing in automo-
                                wide range of           bile parts, sup-
                                sports equipment-       plies and acces-
                                from footwear and       sories]
                                apparel to hard
                                goods];
                                "AUTHORITY"
                                [rainwear,
                                jackets, coats,
                                suits, slacks, and
                                vests];
                                "THE SKI
                                AUTHORITY"
                                [retail store ser-
                                vices featuring
                                ski equipment
                                and clothing];
                                "THE BAG
                                AUTHORITY"
                                [athletic bags,
                                etc.]
                                (opposer claiming
                                a family of
                                "AUTHORITY" marks)

Mark and                                        Citable as
Goods Cited by                                  Precedent
Examining Atty.                                 of TTAB

                                                No

                                                No

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION