Summary of Final Decisions

                                 Issued by the

                       Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

                              September 1-5, 1997


                Type            Proceeding
Date            of              or                      Party/
Issued          Case (1)        App'n No.               Parties

9-2             EX              74/276,765              Maytag Corp.

9-2             EX              74/610,374              Five Star
                                                        Productions,
                                                        LLC

9-4             OPP             96,651                  Rolex Watch
                                                        U.S.A., Inc.
                                                        v. Reuben
                                                        Teves

9-4             EX              74/512,671              Franco's Res-
                                                        taurants Ltd.

                                Opposer's/              Applicant's/
                                Petitioner's            Respondent's
                TTAB            Mark and                Mark and
Issue           Decision        Goods/Services          Goods/Services

2(e)(1)         Refusal                                 "MICRO-MESH"
[genericness/   Affirmed                                [filters for
mere descrip-   as to mere                              dishwashing
tiveness]       descriptive-                            machines]
                ness, but
                registration
                allowed in
                view of ap-
                plicant's
                alternative
                claim of
                distinctive-
                ness under
                Sec. 2(f)

2(d)            Refusal                                 "COMMONSENSE"
                Affirmed                                [calendar desk
                                                        pads and sta-
                                                        tionery]

2(d)            Opposition      design consisting       design incorpor-
                Sustained       of a crown              ating a crown and
                                [timepieces of all      a jeweler's saw-
                                kinds and parts         frame
                                therefor]               [jewelry, namely,
                                                        rings, pins,
                                                        brooches, pen-
                                                        dants, necklaces,
                                                        earrings, tie
                                                        tacks, charms,
                                                        bracelets, etc.]

2(d)            Refusal                                 "FRANCO'S"
                Affirmed                                [restaurant and
                                                        carry-out ser-
                                                        vices, namely,
                                                        for pizza and
                                                        spaghetti]

Mark and                                        Citable as
Goods Cited by                                  Precedent
Examining Atty.                                 of TTAB

                                                No

"COMMON SENSE"                                  No
and "SHIPMAN'S
COMMON SENSE"
(and design)
[file folders and binders]

                                                No

"FRANCO'S DELI"                                 No
(and design)
[sandwiches, namely,
cheeseburgers, BBQ,
chicken, sausage, and
submarine sandwiches]

(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION