Date
Download CSV
Title Content type Promoted to landing pages Topics Event date Authored on
Applicant filed an application with a claim for the benefit of an earlier copending nonprovisional application, Application No. 05/123,455. The benefit claim was filed within four months from the actual filing date of the application, but referenced an i FAQ
Applicant filed an application with a claim for the benefit of an earlier copending nonprovisional application. The benefit claim was filed within four months from the actual filing date of the application, but omitted the relationship between the applica FAQ
Applicant filed a benefit claim to an earlier provisional application within four months from the actual filing date of a utility nonprovisional application filed on or after November 29, 2000. Applicant, however, submitted a benefit claim that included FAQ No
Applicant filed an application with a benefit claim to an earlier copending nonprovisional application. The benefit claim was filed within four months from the actual filing date of the application, but the relationship of the applications was designated FAQ
If applicant fails to file an amendment to add a claim for the benefit of a prior-filed reissue application in a later-filed reissue application within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78(a)(2) (e.g., four months from the actual filing date of the la FAQ
Applicant failed to claim the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, or 365(c) in a later-filed original application, which issued as a patent. Applicant subsequently filed a reissue application to correct the patent by adding a cl FAQ
I filed a continued prosecution application (CPA) in a 1.53(b) application that did not include a continuity claim to an earlier nonprovisional application. I now want to add the continuity claim to the earlier nonprovisional application under 35 U.S.C. 1 FAQ
If a 35 U.S.C. § 111(a) continuation of the same International Application is filed, should the first line of the specification of the continuation application be amended to contain the relationship to the International Application? FAQ
When the National Stage of an International Application is entered as to the United States, should the first line of the specification be amended to recite the relationship of the National Stage to the International Application and/or should the language FAQ
What AIPA Forms are available on the USPTO web site? FAQ
Download CSV
share Share this page     print Print this page
Additional information  about this page