| US 7,469,392 B2 | ||
| Abstraction refinement using controllability and cooperativeness analysis | ||
| Yiu Chung Mang, Toronto (Canada); and Pei-Hsin Ho, Portland, Oreg. (US) | ||
| Assigned to Synopsys, Inc., Mountain View, Calif. (US) | ||
| Filed on Dec. 08, 2005, as Appl. No. 11/298,120. | ||
| Claims priority of provisional application 60/634671, filed on Dec. 09, 2004. | ||
| Prior Publication US 2006/0129959 A1, Jun. 15, 2006 | ||
| Int. Cl. G06F 17/50 (2006.01) | ||
| U.S. Cl. 716—5 [716/4] | 17 Claims |

| 1. A method for refining an abstract model, the method comprising:
receiving an abstract model which is a subset of a logic design, wherein the abstract model is represented using a set of
variables and a set of Boolean functions;
receiving a safety property for the logic design which is desired to be proven;
receiving a set of counter-examples, wherein a counter-example is a sequence of states that violates the safety property,
wherein a state is an assignment of values to the variables, wherein the variable values are determined using the set of Boolean
functions and the variable values in the previous state;
determining a set of cooperative variables using the set of counter-examples, wherein a cooperative variable is a variable
that helps invalidate a counter-example; and
refining the abstract model using the set of cooperative variables;
wherein the safety property specifies an initial state and a fail variable;
wherein a counter-example is a sequence of states which begins with the initial state, and ends with a state in which the
fail variable is true;
wherein the safety property is proven for the logic design if and only if there does not exist a counter-example for the safety
property; and
wherein proving the safety property for the abstract model is equivalent to proving the safety property for the logic design.
|