| Moatz, Harry
From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:
jack. e.haken@...
Friday, December 19, 2003 12:06 PM
ethicsrules comments
matthieu.van.kaam@...; m.marion@...; jack. slobod@...
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 68 Fed Reg 69442
This comment is submitted on behalf of Koninklijke Philips
Electronics NV (KPENV). KPENV and its related companies are
among the largest customers of the USPTO. We typically file
in excess of 3000 new U.S. utility patent applications per
year.
1. Philips believes that the proposals for mandatory continuing
education (CLE) set fort:
in sections 11.12 & 13 of the proposed rules are unduly
and unnecessarily burdensome
inasmuch as and to the extent that they fail to coordinate
with and take into
consideration the concurrent CLE requirements of other bars
and jurisdictions. We believe,
that most practitioners admitted to the USPTO are already
subject to some form of
mandatory state CLE supervision and that the USPTO should
make every effort to
provide an avenue that allows concurrent fulfillment of state
and USPTO requirements.
We propose that the rule be amended to allow a practitioner
to claim mandatory CLE credit from the USPTO for any state
bar sanctioned CLE program based upon the practitioner's representation
that the course content is reasonably related to the specialized
practice of patent law and/or to relevant ethical issues.
2. We believe that the provisions of Section 11.13(g)(4)
that make law firms, professional corporations and corporate
law departments ineligible to become approved CLE sponsors
are arbitrary, unfair and wholly unsupported by any facts
on the public record. We believe that a significant portion
of the mandatory State CLE taken by our employees is presently
in the form of state approved in?house and/or law firm sponsored
courses and that these courses provide specialized insights
and experiences which are unavailable from courses offered
by the so?called commercial educators. These courses which
are usually given either on?site or in close proximity to
our offices are also far more efficient and effective than
commercial courses which generally require travel by the participants.
Certain representatives of the USPTO have informally suggested
to professional groups that Section 11.13(g)(4) is being proposed
because the Office does not believe that it will have the
necessary resources to oversee the large number of sponsorship
requests that it foresees being submitted if the excluded
entities were eligible to be sponsors. If these comments reflect
USPTO thinking, we note that there has been no reported agency
fact finding to support this conclusion and that, even if
true, it does not support the arbitrary assignment of business
to certain industry segments. We believe that the burden of
approval review could be greatly reduced if the Office accepts
our suggestion to automatically grant CLE credit to state
bar approved CLE courses. Absent this change, we believe that
an impartial lottery system is the only fair way to allocate
scarce review resources among applicants who seek to be approved
as sponsors.
`
Philips Intellectual Proper' & Standards
345 Scarborough Road
Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510 USA
Tel: +1 914 333 9650; Fax: +1 914 332 0615;
Mobile: +1 203 512 0139
E?Mail: jack.e.haken@...
Intranet: pww.ips....
Internet: www.ip....
3. We believe that the provisions of proposed section 11.806
would give the USPTO unwarranted and abusive powers to investigate
the private lives and affairs of practitioners. The USPTO
has no experience or expertise in reviewing the questions
of sexual conduct and personal relationships prohibited by
this section. The matter is best left to state statutes and
state bar rules.
Regards,
Jack Haken
Vice President - U.S. Philips Corporation
Philips Intellectual Property & Standards
P.O. Box 3001
Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510?8001 USA
Courier/visiting address:
Phillips Intellectual Property & Standards
345 Scarborough Road
Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510 USA
Tel: +1 914 333 9650; Fax +1 914 332 0615;
Mobile: +1 203 512 0139+
E-Mail: jack.e.haken@...
Intranet : pww.ips....
Internet : www.ip....
|