POLICY   
Comments from the Public > Representation of Others Before USPTO > Ralph F. Crandell
Ralph F. Crandell


Moatz, Harry
From: rcrandell@....
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:49 PM
To: ethicsrules comments
Subject: Comments Re Proposed Rules 11.12 and 1.21(a)(7)

Proposed Rule 11.12 would burden 28,000 competent Registered Practitioners because of the alleged transgressions of an insignificant number of Practitioners. Proposed Rule 11.12 should be deleted.

Because Proposed Rule 11.12 and its attendant expense is unnecessary, the annual fee for Registered Practitioners of Proposed Rule 1.21(a)(7) should be omitted or substantially reduced.

Not all Patent Practitioners have a yearly income of $100,000.00. Many earn less. A maximum annual fee of $25.00 should cover administrative expenses of maintaining the Register. .

Before adopting either Proposed Rule, competent studies of the real need for such changes should be made and reported.

Ralph F. Crandell
Registered Patent Attorney
Centennial, Colorado

KEY: e Biz=online business system fees=fees forms=formshelp=help laws and regs=laws/regulations definition=definition (glossary)

Is there a question about what the USPTO can or cannot do that you cannot find an answer for? Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other improvements on the website.


|.HOME | SITE INDEX | SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY