POLICY   
Comments from the Public > Representation of Others Before USPTO > Anonymous 3
Anonymous 3


Moatz, Harry

From: PatentMan27@...
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 7:24 PM
To: ethicsrules comments
Subject: Against Proposed Ethics Rules

I oppose the proposed rules for several reasons. First, inadequate time (during the Holiday season) was provided for proper review of the proposals. The timing gives the appearance that the PTO is trying to sneak the rules through. The PTO is not authorized nor qualified to oversee CLEs. The PTO can't even properly train their own examiners. The proposed $100 yearly fee is the true agenda for the rules. I propose that the PTO save money by eliminating the wasteful jobs of the people responsible for creating these proposed rules. I plan on contacting my congressman to have a congressional hearing on further misuse of funds at the PTO!

KEY: e Biz=online business system fees=fees forms=formshelp=help laws and regs=laws/regulations definition=definition (glossary)

Is there a question about what the USPTO can or cannot do that you cannot find an answer for? Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other improvements on the website.


|.HOME | SITE INDEX | SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY