PLAN   
Strategic Plan > Index to Action Papers > Accelerated Patent Examination

Accelerated Patent Examination

Action:


Applicants should be given the option of choosing an accelerated examination procedure.  An application subject to an accelerated examination procedure would have a pendency of no longer than 12 months. 

Background Information:


New patent applications are normally taken up for examination in the order of their effective United States filing date.  However, the Commissioner may provide that a patent application will be advanced out of turn for examination if a petition to make special under 37 CFR 1.102(c) or (d) is granted. 

Currently, applicants can file a "petition to make special" for utility patent applications requesting accelerated examination under the guidelines set forth in MPEP 708.02, subsection VIII.  Under the current "petition to make special" procedure, applicants must (1) pay a $130 petition fee, (2) direct all claims to a single invention, (3) conduct a pre-examination prior art search, (4) submit a copy of the references most closely related to the claimed subject matter, and (5) submit a detailed discussion of the most closely related references.  At a cost of $130, it might be expected that the "petition to make special" procedure would be widely used.  However, the number of petitions to make special, accelerated examination based on MPEP 708.02, subsection VIII, filed per year has been very small.  For calendar year 1997, 359 petitions were filed; for 1998, 490 petitions were filed; for 1999, 549 petitions were filed; for 2000, 670 petitions were filed; and for 2001, 373 petitions were filed.  The reason for the small number of filings may be that a grantable petition to make special does not serve to expedite initial application processing and post-allowance publication, or that the Office has not stated any specific pendency reduction goal for the "petition to make special" procedure.  

The proposed accelerated examination procedure provides an attractive option to applicants frustrated by extended pendency and who desire their patents to issue more quickly.

Options Considered:


An applicant may request expedited examination process for a newly filed non-provisional application by submitting a request for expedited examination along with the required fee at the time of filing of the application.  An application subject to this expedited examination process will have a pendency of no longer than 12 months.  In order for a newly filed non-provisional application to be eligible for this expedited examination process, the following requirements to be used in a pilot phase of the program must be met:


·       A complete application must be electronically submitted to the USPTO.  Payment of any patent filing/process fees must be paid by either authorizing the charge to applicant's deposit account or charging the fees to a credit card;

·       Applicant must perform a pre-examination search including U.S. patents and published applications, foreign patents and publications, and non-patent literature.  Applicant must include a statement that a pre-examination search was made, listing the field of search by class and subclass, databases searched, and the search queries used in such database searches.  Based on the pre-examination search performed, applicant must provide a presumptive classification for the application;


·       Applicant must submit an information disclosure statement (IDS) complying with 37 CFR 1.98.  Applicant must identify each reference cited in the IDS that is deemed to be the most closely related to the claimed subject matter and include a relevancy discussion for each reference identified.  Applicant would be required to supply a copy of each reference identified as the most closely related to the claimed subject matter in the IDS in an electronic image format;

·       The application must be limited to a total of no more than 20 claims with no more than 3 of those claims being independent claims.  Examiners will only examine the independent claims and the dependent claims will stand or fall with the independent claims; and

·       All the claims must be directed to a single invention.

During prosecution of the application, the following expedited procedures must be followed:

·       The newly filed non-provisional application will be taken up for examination by the examiner before all other categories of applications, and the application will be given a complete first action on an expedited basis.  A first action rejection will set a two-month shortened statutory period for reply.  No supplemental amendment is permitted.  No extension of time is permitted;

·       All correspondence to the Office after the initial filing of the application, including replies to Office actions, must be made by facsimile transmission or via e-mail within the two-month period;

·       The examiner will, within two weeks from the date of receipt of applicant's reply, take up the application for final disposition.  This disposition will constitute either a final rejection with a setting of a two-month shortened statutory period for reply, or a notice of allowance.  If a notice of allowance and issue fee due is mailed, the notice will indicate that applicant is required to submit a publication ready version of the application along with the issue fee within one-month from the mailing date of the notice.  No extension of time is permitted;

·       If a final rejection is mailed, the Office action will set a two-month shortened statutory period for reply.  An amendment after final rejection to be entered must place the application in condition for allowance.  Otherwise, a reply to the final rejection is limited to the filing of a notice of appeal under 37 CFR 1.191 or the filing of a request for continued examination (RCE) under 37 CFR 1.114.  The filing of a notice of appeal or an RCE will remove the application from the expedited examination process;

·       During the two-month period for reply to the final rejection, applicant is encouraged to request an interview with the examiner for the purpose of reaching an agreement on an amendment, which would place the application in condition for allowance.  If an agreement cannot be reached to place the application in condition for allowance, applicant's reply to the final rejection is limited to the filing of a notice of appeal or an RCE;

·       Any supplemental IDSs must be submitted via an RCE.

After allowance, these applications subject to the expedited examination process will be given top priority for printing.

USPTO Recommended Course of Action:


Adopt the option with the aforestated criteria as a pilot and seek statutory change to provide for a cost-based expedited examination procedure that would guarantee applicant a pendency of no longer than 12 months from filing to patent issuance.  Implement accelerated examination as part of an additional track under the proposed multi-track examination process.  USPTO has determined that it has a maximum capacity to handle 5 percent of its workload on an expedited basis.  The pilot will determine whether the criteria produce an over or under target participation rate.

Proof of Concept:


Once legislation is obtained to establish a fee for a cost-based expedited examination procedure, USPTO will commence a pilot program to determine whether the aforestated are the appropriate criteria for the accelerated examination procedure.  The public will be notified of the availability and the requirements of the pilot program by means of a publication.  The results of the pilot program will be analyzed.  The criteria for the accelerated examination procedure will be revised accordingly based on the results of the pilot program prior to full implementation of the accelerated examination procedure.     

 

Implementation Schedule
Work Breakdown Structure Task Name Start Finish Project Lead
6 Accelerated Examination 1: P-10-01 - Accelerated Examination 10/01/03 03/13/06 M. Greenlief, J. Kittle
6.1 Legislation to provide statutory fee (P-10-01) 10/01/03 10/01/03  
6.2 Publish final rules, if fee amount set in legislation (P-10-01) 10/01/03 10/01/03  
6.3 Draft proposed rules, if fee amount IS NOT set in legislation (P-10-01) 10/07/03 01/02/04  
6.4 Review by Solicitor's Office (P-10-01) 03/11/04 03/25/04  
6.5 Review by General Law Office (P-10-01) 03/25/04 04/01/04  
6.6 Publish proposed rules (P-10-01) 01/02/04 04/15/04  
6.7 Close comment period (P-10-01) 04/16/04 06/15/04  
6.8 Review by Solicitor's Office (P-10-01) 09/01/04 09/15/04  
6.9 Review by General Law Office (P-10-01) 09/15/04 10/01/04  
6.10 Publish final rule (P-10-01) 06/15/04 10/15/04  
6.11 Review LR status (P-10-01) 09/14/04 09/14/04  
6.12 Implement final rule (P-10-01) 12/15/04 12/15/04  
6.13 Define EFS Requirements (P-10-01) 12/01/04 02/28/05  
6.14 Baseline EFS Project (P-10-01) 03/01/05 03/28/05  
6.15 Enhance EFS (P-10-01) 03/29/05 03/13/06  
6.16 Complete EFS Enhancements for accelerated examination (P-10-01) 03/13/06 03/13/06  
6.17 Define OACS Requirements (P-10-01) 10/01/03 12/31/03  
6.18 Baseline OACs Project (P-10-01) 01/07/04 02/03/04  
6.19 Enhance OACS (P-10-01) 02/05/04 01/18/05  
6.20 Complete OACS enhancements for accelerated examination (P-10-01) 01/19/05 01/19/05  

KEY: e Biz=online business system fees=fees forms=formshelp=help laws and regs=laws/regulations definition=definition (glossary)

Is there a question about what the USPTO can or cannot do that you cannot find an answer for? Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other improvements on the website.


|.HOME | SITE INDEX| SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY