Date Type of Proceeding Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties 9-25 OPP 96,405 Bridgestone/ Firestone, Inc. v. Interco Tire Corp. 9-25 EX 75/023,135 Enersyst Development Center 9-25 EX 74/658,746 Auto Parts (R) Club, LLC Opposer's/ Applicant's/ Petitioner's Respondent's TTAB Mark and Mark and Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services de jure Opposition configuration of function- Sustained the tread design ality; (but only on of a tire asserted acquired the grounds as a trademark for distinctive- of lack of applicant's tires ness [under acquired dis- Sec. 2(f)] tinctiveness) 2(e)(1) Refusal "AIR FRYER" Affirmed [ovens, namely, commercial cooking impingement and convection ovens] 2(e)(1) Request for "AUTO PARTS CLUB" [genericness] Reconsidera- [discount whole- tion Denied sale and retail [Refusal store services in Affirmed] the field of automotive parts] Mark and Citable as Goods Cited by Precedent Examining Atty. of TTAB No No No (1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION