Date Type of Proceeding Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties 9-10 EX 74/731,211 Fisheye, Inc. 9-10 EX 74/677,288 FMC Corp. 9-10 EX 74/490,595 Timothy J. Sheehan 9-11 OPP 96,404 The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. Interco Tire Corp. Opposer's/ Applicant's/ Petitioner's Respondent's TTAB Mark and Mark and Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services Sec. 6 Refusal "FISHEYE" disclaimer Affirmed (and fish design) requirement [underwater video (of word cameras] "FISHEYE") "ALSTAR" 2(d) Refusal (and design) Affirmed [traps, namely, bait stations containing an oxidative phos- phorylation uncoupler for at- tracting and kil- ling ants] 2(e)(3) Refusal "CUBITA" Reversed [coffee] de jure Opposition configuration of function- Sustained the tread design ality; (but only on of a tire asserted acquired the grounds as a trademark for distinc- of lack of applicant's tires tiveness acquired dis- [under tinctiveness) Sec. 2(f)] Mark and Citable as Goods Cited by Precedent Examining Atty. of TTAB No "ALL STAR" No [pesticides, namely, bug and ant killing compositions for institutional and industrial use]; "ALLSTAR" (and design) [janitorial preparations for institutional and industrial use, namely, pesticides] No No (1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION