SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
September 8-12, 1997
| Date Issued | Type of Case(1) | Proceeding or Appn. No. | Party or Parties | TTAB Panel(2) | Issue | TTAB Decision | Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services | Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services | Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney | Examining Attorney | Citable as Precedent of TTAB |
| 9-9 | EX | 74/319,375 | Nanao U.S.A. Corp. | Cissel Hanak Hohein* |
whether applicants specimens demonstrate use of its mark on the goods as originally identified in its application; whether applicants proposed amendment to its identification of goods is within the scope of the original identification | Refusal Affirmed | "FLEXCOLOR" [cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors for computers and television sets] | Moorhead | No | ||
| 9-9 | OPP | 93,383 | Bose Corp. v. Kaman Music Corp. | Sams Cissel* Hohein |
2(e)(1) [genericness / mere descriptive-ness] | Opposition Sustained (on ground of mere descriptive-ness) | "DYNAMIC CORRECTION" [electronic sound correction devices forming a part of a guitar] | No |
(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (MD)=Motion to
Dismiss; (MR)=Motion to Reopen; (R)=Request for Reconsideration
(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member
SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
September 8-12, 1997 (continued)
| Date Issued | Type of Case(1) | Proceeding or Appn. No. | Party or Parties | TTAB Panel(2) | Issue | TTAB Decision | Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services | Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services | Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney | Examining Attorney | Citable as Precedent of TTAB |
| 9-9 | OPP | 92,916 | Hayes Micro-computer Products, Inc. v. Archtek America Corp. | Sams Simms* Hohein |
2(e)(1); 2(e)(2); ownership | Opposition Dismissed | "SMARTLINK" [computer peripherals, namely, modems for computers, and computer modem operating software and manuals sold as a unit for use in the field of telecommunications] | No | |||
| 9-11 | EX | 74/527,928 | Kids Count Entertain-ment, Inc. | Simms* Cissel Hairston |
2(d) | Refusal Affirmed | "KIDS COUNT" [gift and party supplies made of paper; stationery and school supplies] | "KIDS COUNT" [educational services, namely, providing in-class incentives to grade school students to demonstrate excellence in problem-solving activities in the field of math through the issuance of awards] | Slonim | No | |
| 9-11 | EX | 74/514,564 | Servistar Corp. | Hohein* Hairston Walters |
2(d) | Refusal Affirmed | "RENTER CENTER" [rental of hand power tools to the home market] | "RENTCENTER" (and design) [rental of power and hand tools, concrete mixers, tractors, air compressors, builders and contractors equipment, and trailers] | Le | No |
(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (MD)=Motion to
Dismiss; (MR)=Motion to Reopen; (R)=Request for Reconsideration
(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member
SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
September 8-12, 1997 (continued)
| Date Issued | Type of Case(1) | Proceeding or Appn. No. | Party or Parties | TTAB Panel(2) | Issue | TTAB Decision | Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services | Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services | Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney | Examining Attorney | Citable as Precedent of TTAB |
| 9-11 | EX | 74/475,911 | Dirck Hecking | Sams Simms Hairston* |
2(d) | Refusal Affirmed [but only as to registration for "STAR-SHIP TRANS-PORTA-TION INC. (and design)] | "STARSHIP AIRLINES" [air transportation of persons] | "STARSHIP TRANSPORTATION INC." (and design) [freight transportation services, namely, transportation of goods of others by land and air; truck transportation services]; "STARSHIP" (and design) [airplanes and structural parts therefor]; "STAR/SHIP ATLANTIC," "STAR/SHIP MAJESTIC," and "STAR/SHIP OCEANIC" [all three marks for transportation of passengers by boat] | Kline | No |
(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (MD)=Motion to
Dismiss; (MR)=Motion to Reopen; (R)=Request for Reconsideration
(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member
SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
September 8-12, 1997 (continued)
| Date Issued | Type of Case(1) | Proceeding or Appn. No. | Party or Parties | TTAB Panel(2) | Issue | TTAB Decision | Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services | Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services | Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney | Examining Attorney | Citable as Precedent of TTAB |
| 9-11 | EX | 74/361,830 | L. Perrigo Co. | Seeherman Hohein Walters* |
whether the specimens submitted with statement of use show a mark that is materially different from the mark in connection with which the notice of allowance was issued (thus rendering the proposed amended drawing unacceptable) | Refusal Affirmed | "CONFIRMED RELEASE" (and design) [dietary supplements] | Micheli | No |
(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (MD)=Motion to
Dismiss; (MR)=Motion to Reopen; (R)=Request for Reconsideration
(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member
SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
September 8-12, 1997 (continued)
| Date Issued | Type of Case(1) | Proceeding or Appn. No. | Party or Parties | TTAB Panel(2) | Issue | TTAB Decision | Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services | Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services | Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney | Examining Attorney | Citable as Precedent of TTAB |
| 9-12 | EX | 74/610,551 | Societe dImporta-tion de Diffusion ou Distribution dArticles de Sport S.I.D.A.S. | Cissel* Hohein Hairston |
whether the mark in applicants proposed amended drawingoffered to conform to the requirements of Sec. 44--is a material alteration of the mark shown in the drawing originally filed | Refusal Affirmed | "PODITECH" [orthopedic soles and
shoes] [the proffered amended drawing showed the mark "PODIATECH"] |
Michos | No | ||
| 9-12 | EX | 74/682,500 | Cardinal Business Media, Inc. | Quinn Hohein* Hairston |
2(d) | Refusal Affirmed | "ONSTAGE" [directories of goods and services particular to the live performance industry] | "AT&T: ONSTAGE" (in stylized lettering) [entertainment services, namely, the sponsorship, promotion and presentation of live theatrical shows, live dance shows and live musical performances] | Mays | No |
(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (MD)=Motion to
Dismiss; (MR)=Motion to Reopen; (R)=Request for Reconsideration
(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

Last Modified: 10/13/98