[US_Patent_and_Trademark_Office]

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

June 2-6, 1997

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
6-3 EX

EX

74/494,266

74/495,088

Micom Communi-cations Corp. Cissel

Seeherman

Walters*

2(d) Refusal Affirmed (in both cases)   "MICROBAND" and "MICROBAND ATM" [both marks for apparatus for wide area network telecommunications systems using cell relay and frame relay technologies to manage a combination of voice, synchronous and asynchronous data and local area network (LAN) data from different multiplexers in a network to maintain a high efficiency in the network over a wide range of variable line rates] "MICROBAND" (and design) [telecommunication services] Zak No
6-3 EX 74/589,336 Fusion Lighting, Inc. Seeherman*

Hohein

Hairston

2(e)(1) Refusal Affirmed   "S LAMP" [electric light bulbs and lamps]   First No
6-3 EX 74/534,896 Bacardi & Co. Ltd. Sams

Quinn

Walters*

2(e)(3) Refusal Affirmed   "HAVANA STYLE" [rum]   Reihner No
6-3 EX 74/294,182 Indian Nation Leather Co. Simms

Hanak*

Hohein

2(a) [false suggestion of a connection]; whether use in commerce is unlawful [under Fed. Indian Arts and Crafts Act] Refusal Reversed   "INDIAN NATION LEATHER CO." (and design) [wholesale distributorship and mail-order services for equestrian equipment]   Leifman No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

 

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

June 2-6, 1997 (continued)

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
6-5 OPP 91,299 Tanning Research Laboratories, Inc. v. Black Prince Distillery, Inc. Cissel

Hanak

Walters*

2(d) Opposition Dismissed "HAWAIIAN TROPIC" (with or without various designs) [sunscreens, tanning oils and lotions, hair care products, swimwear, visors and caps, shorts, sunglasses, etc.] "HAWAIIAN TROPICAL" [vodka]     No
6-6 OPP 84,899 Pacific Sea Foods Co. v. Emerald Seafoods, Inc. Hanak*

Quinn

Walters

2(d) Opposition Sustained "EMERALD BRAND" [seafood] "EMERALD SEAFOODS INCORPORATED" (and design) [seafood]     No
6-6 EX 74/555,094 Courtaulds Performance Films, Inc. Rice

Cissel*

Walters

2(d) Refusal Reversed   "VISTA" (and design) [tinted, laminated or reflective plastic films marketed and sold through professional designers for retrofit on the interior surfaces of windows of buildings by professional installers] "VISTA" (and design) [metal and non-metal custom windows] Weigell No
6-6 EX 74/634,610 MediaShare Corp. Sams

Simms

Hohein*

whether the specimens of use submitted with the application show use of applicant’s mark "in commerce" Refusal Affirmed   "PB.WEB" [computer software for publishing information on a computer network and instruction manuals therefor, sold together as a unit]   Doninger Yes

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

 

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

June 2-6, 1997 (continued)

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
6-6 EX 74/382,736 Boyer Candy Co., Inc. Cissel

Quinn

Hairston*

2(d) Refusal Affirmed   "BONBONNIERE" [filled chocolate candies] "LA BONBONNIERE BAKE SHOPPE" [retail bake shop and wholesale baking services] Michos No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member 

Return to the USPTO Home Page

Last Modified: 8/13/98