SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
February 24-28, 1997
| Date Issued | Type of Case(1) | Proceeding or Appn. No. | Party or Parties | TTAB Panel(2) | Issue | TTAB Decision | Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services | Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services | Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney | Examining Attorney | Citable as Precedent of TTAB |
| 2-25 | EX | 74/511,849 | Strippit, Inc. | Rice Hanak* Hohein |
2(e)(1) [deceptively mis-descriptive] | Refusal Reversed |
"SMART TOOL" [tooling for punch presses] | Baxley | No | ||
| 2-26 | EX | 74/498,247 | Brian Santone | Seeherman Hohein Walters* |
whether applicant is using the mark sought to be registered in connection with the services recited in the application | Refusal Affirmed | "SANTONE LURES" [manufacture of fishing lures to the order and/or specification of others] | Doninger | No | ||
| 2-26 | EX (R) |
74/101,177 | EBSCO Industries, Inc. | Sams Rice Seeherman* |
whether the configuration of applicants goods, which configuration applicant claims as its trademark, is de jure functional and, if not, whether the configuration is inherently distinctive | Request for Reconsid-eration Denied [Refusal Affirmed (on both grounds)] | configuration of a fishing lure [fishing lures] | Moorhead | No | ||
| 2-26 | EX | 74/453,230 | John Michaels, Inc. | Cissel* Seeherman Hohein |
2(d) | Refusal Affirmed | "MICHAELS" [frozen custard] | "MICHAELS" (and design) [restaurant services] | Milton | No |
(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration
(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member
SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
February 24-28, 1997 (continued)
| Date Issued | Type of Case(1) | Proceeding or Appn. No. | Party or Parties | TTAB Panel(2) | Issue | TTAB Decision | Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services | Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services | Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney | Examining Attorney | Citable as Precedent of TTAB |
| 2-26 | OPP OPP OPP OPP OPP |
85,880 85,881 85,884 85,903 85,952 |
SAS Institute Inc. v. Scientific and Engineering Software, Inc. | Cissel Hohein* Hairston |
2(d) | Oppositions Dismissed | "SAS," "SAS/IMS," "SAS/IMS-DL/I," (and others) [all for "prerecorded computer programs" and/or "computer program manuals"]; "SAS/ETS" [prerecorded computer programs pertaining to econometrics and time series analysis and computer program manuals pertaining to same]; "SAS" (in stylized lettering) [computer programs for use in data management and analysis and information processing and user manuals for such programs]; "SAS/ASSIST" [computer programs for use as a menu driven user interface]; "SAS/STAT" [computer programs for use in data analysis and information processing and user manuals for such programs]; "SAS/CPE" [computer programs used in computer performance evaluation and user manuals for such programs]; et al. | "SES" (and design), "SES/SIM," "SES/SCOPE," "SES/DESIGN," and "SES/RTL" [all five marks for "computer programs and instructional manuals supplied therewith, all for use in the evaluation, design and simulation of complex electronic systems"] | No |
(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration
(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member
Last Modified: 8/11/98