[US_Patent_and_Trademark_Office]

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

February 24-28, 1997

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
2-25 EX 74/511,849 Strippit, Inc. Rice

Hanak*

Hohein

2(e)(1) [deceptively mis-descriptive] Refusal

Reversed

  "SMART TOOL" [tooling for punch presses]   Baxley No
2-26 EX 74/498,247 Brian Santone Seeherman

Hohein

Walters*

whether applicant is using the mark sought to be registered in connection with the services recited in the application Refusal Affirmed   "SANTONE LURES" [manufacture of fishing lures to the order and/or specification of others]   Doninger No
2-26 EX

(R)

74/101,177 EBSCO Industries, Inc. Sams

Rice

Seeherman*

whether the configuration of applicant’s goods, which configuration applicant claims as its trademark, is de jure functional and, if not, whether the configuration is inherently distinctive Request for Reconsid-eration Denied [Refusal Affirmed (on both grounds)]   configuration of a fishing lure [fishing lures]   Moorhead No
2-26 EX 74/453,230 John Michaels, Inc. Cissel*

Seeherman

Hohein

2(d) Refusal Affirmed   "MICHAEL’S" [frozen custard] "MICHAEL’S" (and design) [restaurant services] Milton No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

 

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

February 24-28, 1997 (continued)

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
2-26 OPP

OPP

OPP

OPP

OPP

85,880

85,881

85,884

85,903

85,952

SAS Institute Inc. v. Scientific and Engineering Software, Inc. Cissel

Hohein*

Hairston

2(d) Oppositions Dismissed "SAS," "SAS/IMS," "SAS/IMS-DL/I," (and others) [all for "prerecorded computer programs" and/or "computer program manuals"]; "SAS/ETS" [prerecorded computer programs pertaining to econometrics and time series analysis and computer program manuals pertaining to same]; "SAS" (in stylized lettering) [computer programs for use in data management and analysis and information processing and user manuals for such programs]; "SAS/ASSIST" [computer programs for use as a menu driven user interface]; "SAS/STAT" [computer programs for use in data analysis and information processing and user manuals for such programs]; "SAS/CPE" [computer programs used in computer performance evaluation and user manuals for such programs]; et al. "SES" (and design), "SES/SIM," "SES/SCOPE," "SES/DESIGN," and "SES/RTL" [all five marks for "computer programs and instructional manuals supplied therewith, all for use in the evaluation, design and simulation of complex electronic systems"]     No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

Return to the USPTO Home Page

Last Modified: 8/11/98