[US_Patent_and_Trademark_Office]

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

January 20-24, 1997

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
1-22 EX 74/541,654 Merillat Industries, Inc. Rice*

Hohein

Hairston

2(e)(4) [surname] Refusal Affirmed   "PEMBERTON" [furniture cabinets, and drawers and doors therefor]   Baker No
1-24 EX 74/606,076 MSI Crane & Equipment Co., Inc. Rice

Seeherman

Hohein*

2(e)(2); Sec. 6 disclaimer requirement (as to word "SYS-TEMS") Refusal Reversed   "HOUSTON SYSTEMS MARINE PRODUCTS" [crane systems comprising cranes, rig skidding, leveling jacks, motion compensators, line-up stations, conveyors, power units and controls therefor, all sold as a unit]   Frazier No
01-24 EX

(R)

74/368,375 Good News Communica-tions, Inc. Seeherman

Quinn*

Hohein

whether the matter asserted for registration is generic; if not, whether the mark is registrable under Section 2(f) Request for Reconsider-ation Denied [Refusal Affirmed (on both grounds)]   "MOVIEGUIDE" [books, magazines and teaching materials on the subject of rating movies and videos in accordance with a Biblical world view]   Hershkowitz No
01-24 EX 74/362,978 Quotron Systems, Inc. Rice

Seeherman

Hairston*

whether the term applicant seeks to register has been used as a service mark for the services recited in the registration Refusal Affirmed   "ULTRACHART" [computerized financial information services in the field of data regarding all types of financial instruments and markets, indices and statistics relating thereto]   I. Williams No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

 

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

January 20-24, 1997 (continued)

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
1-24 EX 74/166,615 American National Can Co. Rice

Seeherman

Hairston*

de jure functionality of a product configuration; Sec. 2(f) distinctiveness of product configuration Refusal Affirmed (on both grounds)   a can configuration that includes thirty flutes of equal width extending substantially the length of the sidewall of the can body [metal beverage containers]   Kaiser Yes

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member 

Return to the USPTO Home Page

Last Modified: 8/11/98