[US_Patent_and_Trademark_Office]

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

April 14-18, 1997

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
4-17 EX 74/503,783 Finetex Int’l. (USA), Inc. Simms*

Seeherman

Hanak

2(d) Refusal Reversed   "FINETEX" [novelty footwear, namely, plush stuffed animal and stuffed toy slippers] "FINTEX" [neckties, belts, scarves, sweaters, blouses and dresses] Fickes No
4-17 EX 74/455,521 Michigan Discount Jewelers, Ltd. Sams

Simms

Quinn*

whether applicant’s specimens show use of its mark on goods different from those specified in the application) Refusal Reversed   "THE POCKET LOCKER" [cases for holding credit cards, money, and personal ID cards]   Lawrence No
4-17 EX 74/535,662 Penton Publishing, Inc. Quinn

Hohein

Walters*

2(e)(1) Refusal Affirmed   "MECHATRONICS DESIGN" [trade magazine directed to engineers and engineering managers who develop products]   Luthey No
4-17 OPP 91,212 Lanard Toys, Ltd. v. Hasbro, Inc. Simms

Cissel

Quinn*

2(d) Opposition Sustained "THE CORPS!" [toy action figures] "BATTLE CORPS" [toy action figures, toy vehicles and accessories for use therewith]     No
4-17 OPP 91,381 U-Haul Int’l., Inc. v. Mendelovich Rice*

Simms

Quinn

2(d) [family of marks] Opposition Dismissed "U-HAUL" [vehicle rental services]; and an alleged family of marks with the "U-" prefix, used in connection with a range of services, including vehicle rental and retail store services "U-CARD" [credit card services]     No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

 

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

April 14-18, 1997 (continued)

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
4-17 OPP

OPP

OPP

OPP

CAN

91,333

91,334

91,390

91,391

21,109

Leathem S. Stearn v. Rommy Hunt Revson Cissel

Seeherman

Hohein*

2(d) [an issue in each of the four opposition proceedings]; abandonment [an issue only in the cancellation proceeding filed by applicant against opposer’s pleaded registration] Petition to Cancel Denied; Oppositions Sustained "SCUNCI" [elasticized hair holder] "SCUNCI" [cosmetics; eyeglass frames and cords and chains for holding them; leather goods, namely, handbags, wallets, and purses; beauty salon and hairdresssing salon services]     No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

Return to the USPTO Home Page

Last Modified: 10/13/98