[US_Patent_and_Trademark_Office]

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

January 13-17, 1997

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
1-10** EX 74/235,238 PSE Concepts, Inc. Rice

Cissel*

Seeherman

2(d) Refusal Reversed   "PEEK-A-BOO BABY" [plush dolls] "PEEK-A-BOO PALS" [stuffed toy animals] Taylor No
1-13 EX 74/519,199 K. Aram Zildjian Cissel

Hohein*

Hairston

2(d) Refusal Affirmed   "ZILDJIAN SPEAKERS" [loudspeakers] "ZILDJIAN" (in stylized lettering) [three registrations, for, respectively, "musical percussion instruments," "cymbals, gongs, and bells," and "shirts, sleepwear, shorts, jackets, caps and sweatbands"]; plus six other registrations incorporating the word "ZILDJIAN" [each for musical percussion instruments or clothing items] Schulman No
1-13 EX 74/475,277 QVC, Inc. Seeherman

Quinn*

Hairston

2(d) Refusal Affirmed   "THE LOCKER ROOM" [providing at home shopping services in the field of sports clothing and equipment by means of television] "THE LOCKER ROOM" [retail store services specializing in footwear] and "THE NATIONAL LOCKER ROOM" (and design) [retail outlet services and mail order catalog services featuring items licensed by professional sports league organizations] Sanok No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

 

**This decision was inadvertently omitted from the Summary of Final Decisions for the week of January 6-10, 1997.

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

January 13-17, 1997 (continued)

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
1-13 EX 74/520,360 City of Norfolk Virginia Rice

Seeherman

Hanak*

2(e)(4) [surname] Refusal Affirmed   "MACARTHUR CENTER" [operation of a shopping mall and leasing of shopping space to others]   Will No
1-14 EX 74/207,315 EBSCO Industries, Inc. Sams

Rice

Seeherman*

de jure functionality; distinctiveness under Sec. 2(f) Refusal Reversed   configuration of a fishing lure [fishing lures]   Moorhead Yes
1-14 EX 74/445,928 Louis C. Gunsberg dba PitStop Technolo-gies Simms*

Cissel

Hanak

2(d) Refusal Affirmed   "PIT STOP" (and design) [glass repair kits for automobile windshields, consisting of sealant compositions, a syringe applicator, O-rings, and a clamping apparatus] "PIT STOP" (and design) [automobile service station services; motor oil] Nelson No
1-14 OPP 89,301 Desarrollo Industrial Y Tecnologico, S.A. de C.V. v.

758895 Ontario Ltd. T/A N.O.A.O. Imports & Exports and S.C.M.N. Global Traders

Simms

Hanak

Hairston*

2(d); 2(e)(1) [merely descriptive]; 2(e)(1) [deceptively mis-descriptive] Opposition Dismissed "MASECA" (and design) [corn flour] "LA MEJIHARINA" (and design) [prepared and packaged corn masa mix]     No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

 

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

January 13-17, 1997 (continued)

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
1-14 EX 74/325,394 Santangelo Law Offices, P.C. Rice*

Seeherman

Walters

whether the matter asserted for registration has been used on "goods in trade" and, thus, "in commerce" Refusal Affirmed   design of a U.S. patent on a greeting card [greeting cards]   Butler No
1-16 OPP

(R)

92,996 Miguel Torres, S.A. v. Cantine Mezza-corona S.C.A.R.L. Rice Cissel Hanak* 2(d) Request for Recon-sideration Denied [Opposition Sustained] "GRAN CORONAS" (in stylized form) and "CORONAS" (and design) [wine] "MEZZACORONA" (and design) [wines and sparkling wines]     No
1-16 OPP 93,492 Lehman Brothers Inc. v. John L. Loeb, Jr. Associates, Inc. Rice

Simms*

Cissel

2(d) Opposition Sustained "LEHMAN BROTHERS" and "LEHMAN-LOGIC" [various financial and investment services] "LOEB-LEHMAN FUND MANAGEMENT CO." [financial management and advisory services]     No
1-16 EX 74/562,451 Manco, Inc. Rice

Cissel*

Hohein

2(d) Refusal Affirmed (as to both cited registra-tions)   "NO LICK SURE STICK" [envelopes] "SURE STICK" [pressure sensitive adhesive labels]; "NO-LIK" [envelopes] I. Williams No
1-17 EX 74/634,915 Wartsila Diesel Int’l. Ltd. Oy Cissel

Seeherman*

Walters

whether the mark asserted for registration is in use in commerce [mutilation] Refusal Reversed   "WÄRTSILÄ" [diesel motors and internal combustion engines used in energy-production power plants and in ships as main propulsion engines and as auxiliary engines]   Straser No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

 

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

January 13-17, 1997 (continued)

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
1-17 EX

EX

74/138,310

74/141,491

Microfibres, Inc. Rice

Hanak*

Quinn

As to word mark "MICRO-FIBRES": 2(a) [deceptive], genericness, and Section 2(f) distinctiveness

As to mark "MICRO-FIBRES" (and design): 2(a) [deceptive], requirement for Sec. 6 disclaimer of word "MICRO-FIBRES," and Section 2(f) distinctiveness

Refusal Reversed (in both cases)   "MICROFIBRES" and "MICROFIBRES" (and design) [both marks for fabrics for use in the manufacture of upholstered furniture sold to the upholstery industry]   Quinn No
1-17 EX 74/504,838 The Breadshop, Inc. Rice

Hanak*

Walters

2(d) Refusal Reversed   "SIERRA-CRUNCH" [breakfast cereal] "SIERRA SNACKS" (and design) [snack mix, consisting primarily of processed cereals, pretzels, breadsticks, wheat-based snacks and nuts] Friedman No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

 

SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

January 13-17, 1997 (continued)

Date Issued Type of Case(1) Proceeding or Appn. No. Party or Parties TTAB Panel(2) Issue TTAB Decision Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney Examining Attorney Citable as Precedent of TTAB
1-17 EX 74/397,042 Nobody’s Perfect, Inc. Hohein*

Hairston

Walters

2(d) Refusal Reversed   "NOBODY’S PERFECT" (in stylized lettering) [apparel retail store services selling goods of both first and irregular quality] "NO BODY’S PERFECT" [feminine underwear] Bonnet No

(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (R)=Request for Reconsideration

(2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member

Return to the USPTO Home Page

Last Modified: 8/11/98