ABOUT   
Reports > USPTO Annual Reports
Collage showing the Stop Fakes.gov logo as well as other images of U S P T O activities and intellectual property and the words Educate, Register, and Protect. Image is part of the header for the U S P T O Performance and Accountability Report for Fiscal Year 2005.
Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2005
Management's Discussion and Analysis

Table of Contents | Management | Financial | Supplementary | Auditor | IG | Other

Statement of Net Cost

The Statement of Net Cost presents the USPTO’s results of operations by Patent and Trademark business areas. The following table presents the total USPTO’s results of operations for the past four fiscal years.

Net Cost (Dollars in Millions)
  FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Earned Revenue $ 1,061.4  $ 1,162.3  $ 1,239.0  $ 1,372.8 
Program Cost  (1,161.0)
single underline
 (1,206.1)
single underline
 (1,289.2)
single underline
 (1,424.0)
single underline
Net Cost $    99.6 
double underline
$   43.8
double underline
$   50.2
double underline
$    51.2 
double underline

The Statement of Net Cost compares fees earned to costs incurred during a specific period of time. It is not necessarily an indicator of net income or net cost over the life of a patent or trademark. Net income or net cost for the fiscal year is dependent upon the groups of work that have been completed over the various phases of the production life cycle. The net income calculation is based on fees earned during the fiscal year being reported, regardless of when those fees were collected. Maintenance fees play a large part in whether a total net income or net cost is recognized. Maintenance fees collected in FY 2005 are a reflection of patent issue levels 3.5, 7.5, and 11.5 years ago, rather than a reflection of patents issued in FY 2005. Therefore, maintenance fees can have a significant impact on matching costs and revenue. For example, in order to reduce the net cost associated with the patent business line to zero, maintenance fees collected would have needed to be 13.2 percent greater — and the desire to maintain a patent is in the hands of the patent holder and not within the influence of the USPTO. Another example is that first action pendency would have needed to increase by only 0.5 months, instead of 0.9 months, without incurring any related increase in costs.

From FY 2002 through FY 2005, the USPTO’s operations resulted in a net cost. However, in FY 2005, due to changes in the fee schedule and continued increases in filings, the USPTO net cost of operations only increased $1.0 million.

< Previous Page | Next Page >

Is there a question about what the USPTO can or cannot do that you cannot find an answer for? Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other improvements on the website.


.|HOME | SITE INDEX| SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY