|

Pictured
here are the members of the award winning TEAS team with Acting
Director Nicholas Godici, on the left, and Commissioner for Trademarks,
Anne Chasser, on the right.
|
TRADEMARKS
In the
past year, the trademark business has received recognition for excellence
in three national competitions for its successful electronic filing system,
TEAS, and its telecommuting program. Recognition at this level is evidence
of the success of both of these programs and a significant accomplishment
for the USPTO considering the level of competition and publicity these
programs generate. While the USPTO is primarily concerned with how customers
perceive TEAS, and how employees and the trademark business benefit from
the electronic filing and telecommuting programs, it is pleased with the
outside recognition it has received for its e-Government efforts.
In October 2000, the USPTO learned
that the panel of judges for the 2000 Government Technology Leadership
Awards had selected TEAS as one of its winners. For the last eight
years, the Government Technology Leadership Awards program has
celebrated successful U.S. government initiatives. By honoring meritorious
projects and the teams responsible for them, the awards have sought to
encourage innovation. The awards salute projects, large and small, that
directly have aided the mission of their organizations by boosting efficiency
and effectiveness, lowering costs, and/or improving service to the public
through original uses of technology.
Each year as a cooperative academic-industry
effort, the College of Business at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT)
and USA TODAY host the Quality Cup Competition. This competition
recognizes teams who have made significant contributions to the improvement
of quality in their organizations. In March 2001, the TEAS program was
awarded the finalist prize in the government category for the 2001
RIT/USA TODAY Quality Cup Competition.
On June 25, 2001, the USPTO hosted
a ceremony to recognize the receipt of the 100,000th TEAS application,
as filed by the General Electric Company. The 100,000th filing is a significant
milestone in creation of an e-Government operation and confirmation of
customer acceptance for electronic filing.
In August, the USPTO received the Commuter
Connections Employer Recognition Award for its Trademark Work-at-Home
(TWAH) telecommuting program. The award, sponsored by the Metropolitan
Washington Council of Governments, recognized the trademark business as
one of four employers that have created a workplace where telecommuting
produces a "smarter way to work."
Goal: Enhance the quality of our
products and services
Examination
quality was rated at 96.9 percent, based on standards for assessing the
"clear error" rate, for determining the type of errors that could
affect the registrability of a mark. The review of pending, registered,
and abandoned files by the Office of Trademark Quality Review determined
the overall error rate to be 4.5 percent for the year including deficient
search strategies.
Result: Examination Quality
Measure: Reduce the error rate from
6 percent to 3 percent by FY 2004.
|
D
Discussion:
Target exceeded. An error rate is any error that has the potential
to affect the registrability, validity or value of a trademark registration.
Examples would be the failure to refuse registration in view of
a prior registration which may result in the likelihood of confusion
and the failure to refuse a mark that is merely descriptive of the
goods or services. The trademark business is currently developing
a quality index that will incorporate a number of metrics to achieve
a betterbalanced measure of quality.
|
DATA VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION
- Data source: Office
of Trademark Quality Review Report.
- Frequency: Daily
input, monthly reporting.
- Data storage: Automated
systems, reports.
- Verification: Manual
reports and analysis.
- Data Limitations: None.
During the past year, the trademark
business worked to establish a more consistent set of quality measures
that would better reflect the current quality of examination for use beginning
in FY 2002. The trademark business has initiated plans for the creation
of a new set of measures for first action and current quality and to create
the infrastructure needed to support incorporating the results of the
reviews and improving the examination practice.
Results: Customer Satisfaction
Measure: Increase overall customer
satisfaction from 70 percent to 80 percent by FY 2005.
|
D
Discussion:
Target exceeded. The trademark business will continue to seek new
ways to increase our overall customer satisfaction including expansion
of current initiatives. We also will continue prudent monitoring
of our progress with independent annual customer surveys.
|
DATA VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION
- Data source: Customer
surveys.
- Frequency: Surveys
are conducted and results are reported annually.
- Data storage: Paper
files and contractor electronic files.
- Verification: Independent
contractor develops data instrument, conducts survey and compiles results.
Final test for reasonableness is performed internally.
- Data Limitations: None.
Results of the annual customer satisfaction
survey indicate that, considering all customer experiences with the trademark
process, 70 percent of trademark business customers report satisfaction
with its service. This is a significant improvement of five percentage
points from last year’s results. Customers who reported dissatisfaction
dropped to a low of 13 percent.
Results that have the most significant
impact on the level of satisfaction our customers report include:
- Clear written position
of examining attorneys (improved two percentage points to 79 percent);
- Prompt referral to appropriate
office or person within the organization (improved by four percentage
points to 72 percent);
- Phone calls returned within
one business day (improved by two percentage points to 55 percent);
- Resolution of problems
within seven days (improved by one percentage point to 33 percent);
and
- Mailing of filing receipts
for paper-filed applications within 14 days (significantly improved
by 16 percentage points, to 43 percent).
Overall, the trademark business received
high marks for its quality improvement initiatives, shorter cycle times,
and outstanding customer service. Several other customer service improvement
initiatives were undertaken this year.
|

A
second agreement for a trademark work-at-home pilot project was
signed last year with NTEU. Present at the signing were, seated
from left to right: Susan White, paralegal Office of the Commissioner
for Trademarks; Melvin White, President of NTEU 243; and Anne Chasser,
Commissioner for Trademarks. Standing, left to right: Fred Turner,
NTEU representative; Robert Anderson, Deputy Commissioner for Trademarks;
and Debbie Cohn, Group Director Trademark Law Offices.
|

Patent Application Publication No. US 2001/0047321
for "methods and systems for auctioning products," filed
electronically by Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, for Gregory R. Wyatt
of Connecticut, and published after 18 months.
|
Trademark Assistance Center. The
Trademark Assistance Center was restructured in the past year to address
the weakness of handling customer complaints and to improve problem resolution.
Both of these areas for improvement were identified in customer survey
data. Results have been extremely favorable. By the end of the year, the
service level measure indicating the percent of calls responded to within
20 seconds improved significantly -- from 23 percent at the beginning
of the year to 62 percent by year’s end. Improvements that focus
on identifying the source of customer complaints with the objective of
preventing future occurrences will be implemented in the next year.
Goal: Minimize trademark application
processing time
The USPTO
received 232,939 trademark applications, including 296,388 classes for
registration, marking the second highest level of filings ever recorded.
This milestone followed two consecutive years with increases of 27 percent
per year in the number of applications filed. Filings in FY 2001 were
21 percent less than in FY 2000. For the first time in nine years, fewer
applications were received in a fiscal year than in the previous year,
reflecting the largest one-year decline but also the second highest level
of filings ever reported.
Results: First Action Pendency
Measure: Reduce average first action
pendency to 2 months by FY 2004.
|
D
Discussion: Target exceeded.
The trademark business will utilize the opportunity a reduced level
of filings presents to further reduce our average first action pendency
to two months by FY 2004. We will continue to set realistic targets
in consideration of the impact electronic activities has on our
workload.
|
DATA VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION
- Data source: Trademark
Reporting and Monitoring (TRAM) system.
- Frequency: Daily
input, monthly reporting.
- Data storage: TRAM,
automated systems, reports.
- Verification: Accuracy
of supporting data is controlled through internal program edits in the
TRAM system. Final test for reasonableness is performed internally
by examining trademark attorneys and supervisory and program management.
- Data Limitations: None.
Reduced application filings along with
significant increases in examiner production and customer service performance
incentives contributed to reducing first action pendency to its lowest
level in 13 years. The time from filing to an examiner’s first office
action decreased by the end of FY 2001 to 2.7 months from a high of 6.2
months nine months earlier. This is the first time since 1992 that first
action pendency has been within the three-month goal.
Measure: Reduce average total pendency
to 12 months by FY 2006.
|
D
Discussion: Target met. The trademark
business will utilize the opportunity a reduced level of filings
presents to further reduce our average total pendency to 12 months
by FY 2006. We will continue to optimize our examiners as a resource
to ensure pendency to disposal is minimized. Results should be revealed
in the next customer satisfaction survey.
|
DATA VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION
- Data source: TRAM
system.
- Frequency: Daily
input, monthly reporting.
- Data storage: TRAM,
automated systems, reports.
- Verification: Accuracy
of supporting data is controlled through internal program edits
in the TRAM system. Final test for reasonableness is performed internally
by examining trademark attorneys and supervisory and program management.
- Data Limitations: None.
Continued high levels of applications
under examination from prior years kept overall pendency to registration,
notice of allowance or abandonment above the 13-month goal at 17.8 months.
As the total number of applications under examination is reduced, and
first actions are taken within three months, overall pendency to registration
will decrease.
|

Patent
Application Publication No. US 2001/0049668 for "integrated
marketplace model," filed electronically by Michael Dryja, Esq.,
for Dolores M. Wright of Minnesota, and published after 18 months.
|
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results.
Results of the annual employee satisfaction survey reveal that an
impressive number of trademark employees– 68 percent of them–find
satisfaction in the work that they do at the USPTO. Overall satisfaction
of trademark employees working at the USPTO is 66 percent for the same
group of employees, indicating a majority are proud to work for the USPTO.
Survey results confirm that flexible work schedules, increased options
for telecommuting, and opportunities to increase compensation through
performance incentive awards have contributed to the satisfaction of the
employees working at the USPTO and in the trademark business.
Incentive Awards. Performance-based
awards were introduced to provide incentives for increased production
and maintaining customer service timeliness goals. Examiners were offered
the opportunity to receive semi-annual production awards of up to $10,000
for significantly higher production. Overall, the average number of first
actions per examiner was 30 percent higher than the year before and the
average number of action points was up more than 24 percent as a result
of incentive awards. The total actions improved by nearly 26 percent with
a 32 percent improvement in the number of first actions. Along with increasing
employee satisfaction, incentive awards have drastically improved individual
and overall production of the examining corps, reducing pendency, and
increasing the total number of examiner disposals.
A group incentive award for maintaining
customer service response times was implemented for technical support
staff in the second half of the year and has resulted in significant progress
in improving and maintaining processing times for responding to customer
requests.
Trademark Work-at-Home Program.
The number of examining attorneys in the TWAH telecommuting program
increased more than 56 percent since the beginning of FY 2001. The program
consisted of 57 participants at the beginning of FY 2001 and 89 by the
end of the fiscal year. The program has led to increased production as
well as increased job satisfaction.
In FY 2002, the trademark business
will continue to work toward improved performance and customer satisfaction,
building upon the progress that contributed to a successful year in FY
2001.
|

Patent
Application Publication No. US 2001/0046827 for a "method for
manufacturing a multi-tube fluorescent discharge lamp," filed
electronically by Wen-Tsao Lee of Taiwan, and published after 18
months.
|
Trademark Performance
The American Inventors Protection Act,
Title VI, Subtitle G, the Patent and Trademark Office Efficiency Act,
established the USPTO as a PBO on March 29, 2000. The legislation allows
appointment of a Commissioner for Patents as the Chief Operating Officer
for Patents, and a Commissioner for Trademarks as the Chief Operating
Officer for Trademarks. It also requires that an annual performance agreement
be established between the Commissioners and the Secretary of Commerce.
The agreement outlines measurable organizational goals and objectives
for the PBO. The Commissioners may be rewarded a bonus, based upon an
evaluation of their performance as defined in the agreement, of up to
50 percent of their base salary.
The trademark business goals formed
the foundation for the annual performance agreement between the Commissioner
for Trademarks and the Secretary of Commerce, as required by the AIPA.
The performance agreement outlined measurable organizational goals and
objectives for the trademark business based on the above goals and performance
measures. At the time of publication, the Commissioner for Trademarks
performance bonus had not been determined.
|