|

In
July last year, the USPTO signed an agreement with the Patent Office
Professional Association (POPA) that created a patent work-at-home
pilot program. Left to right are: Esther Kepplinger, Deputy Commissioner
for Patent Operations; Stewart Levy (standing) Director Technology
Center 2800; and Ron Stern, President of POPA.
|
PATENTS
FY 2001
was another successful year for the patent business. The first full year
under AIPA has seen significant progress in implementing the major pieces
of this legislation. In May 2001, the patent business published the first
U.S. patent applications under the new statute, commonly called pre-grant
publications. By the end of FY 2001, a total of 25,376 patent applications
had been published. The publication of these application documents is
an historic event for the United States patent system. This information
will expand the public knowledge of the latest technology. Additionally,
the patent business has started measuring patent term adjustments for
patents granted that exceed the specific timeframes defined in the AIPA.
Further, it received the first request under the new inter partes reexamination
rules. The business line also achieved or made significant progress toward
achieving the performance goals and initiatives identified in the beginning
of the fiscal year. It made notable gains in quality and timeliness, as
well as employee and customer satisfaction. The patent business also is
making tremendous strides and continues to build on its successes in e-Government.
The patent business continues to receive
a record number of applications. It received 326,081 utility, plant and
reissue (UPR) applications in FY 2001. Increases in the number of applications
in communications, information processing, and biotechnology led to the
11.2 percent growth over last year. The patent business also issued a
record 170,643 UPR patents, a three percent increase over FY 2000. For
FY 2002, UPR applications are expected to increase another 12 percent,
with the high technology areas leading this growth once again.
Filings under the Patent Cooperation
Treaty (PCT) continued to increase, as shown in the table below. PCT usage
reflects the transition to a global economy because it implements the
concept of a single international patent application which has legal effect
in the member countries.
An important step toward operating
in an electronic environment occurred when the Office of Personnel Management
approved the pay raise portion of the "Agreement on Initiatives for
a New Millennium" on May 31, 2001. This historic agreement is the
result of a cooperative effort by the Patent Office Professional Association
(POPA) and USPTO management, and represents a milestone in the progress
and commitment toward improving the agency for both customers and employees.
The "Millennium" agreement addresses a number of long-standing
issues and will help the organization reach its goals. The agreement includes
a special pay rate to address recruitment and retention issues for patent
examining professionals, moving to an electronic search environment by
the phased elimination of paper search files, improving automation tools,
establishing a patent examiner work-at-home pilot, and adding a customer
service element to employee performance plans. Taken as a whole, these
initiatives will have a positive impact on quality, customer service,
and timeliness, and provide the patent business with the flexibility necessary
to recruit highly-skilled professionals and retain experienced employees
who will help the agency move toward electronic-based processing.
D
Goal:
Enhance the quality of our products and services
Customers
are concerned with the quality of the products and services they receive
in exchange for the fees they pay. The patent business has made great
strides in meeting expectations for high quality products and services.
Results:
Quality of Patents
Measure: Improve quality of patents
by 55 percent through reducing the error rate from 6.6 percent to 3 percent
by FY 2006.
|
D
Discussion:
Target met. FY 2001 reflects actual error rate from September 2000
through August 2001. FY 2002 and beyond will be reported on a September
to August basis. We will continue to concentrate our efforts on
training, providing search tool enhancements, and process improvements.
An error is defined as at least one claim within the randomly selected
allowed application under quality review that would be held invalid
in a court of law, if the application were to issue as a patent
without the required correction. Some examples of errors include
the issuance of a claim notwithstanding the existence of anticipatory
prior art under 35 USC 102, or relevant prior art under 35 USC 103
that would render the allowed claim obvious. Other errors may include
lack of compliance of a claim to the other statutory requirements
(i.e., 35 USC 101, 35 USC 112) and judicially created doctrines.
|
DATA VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION
- Data source: Office
of Patent Quality Review Report.
- Frequency: Daily
input, monthly reporting.
- Data storage: Automated
systems, reports.
- Verification: Manual
reports and analysis.
- Data Limitations: None.
|

The
second business methods partnership meeting was held last year.
Among those in attendance were, from left to right: Vincent Millin,
Supervisory Patent Examiner, TC 2100; Alec French, House Judiciary
Committee; John Love, Director, TC 2100; Chris Katapis, House Judiciary
Committee; Jim Trammel, Supervisory Patent Examiner, TC 2100; and
Wynn Coggins, Supervisory Patent Examiner, TC 2100.
|
The patent business finished FY 2001
with a 5.4 percent error rate, a great improvement from last year's 6.6
percent. Over the past 18 years, this error rate has varied from 3.7 percent
to 7.6 percent. The goal is to reduce the error rate to a level of 3 percent
by FY 2004.
Another key quality measure is the
percent of allowed applications where a significant question relating
to quality of the examination process was raised. This year, the patent
business improved from 7.7 percent to 5.1 percent, beating its target
of 7 percent. Based on the input from our PPAC, the business is developing
a quality index that will incorporate a number of metrics to achieve a
better-balanced measure of quality.
Programs to ensure the quality of patent
business services and products include partnerships, focus sessions, and
round-tables with customers. For example, the business established a customer
partnership-working group in the business methods technology area. An
inaugural business methods partnership meeting was held at the USPTO on
March 1, 2001, with approximately 60 representatives from the business
and legal communities, trade associations, and academia.
The in-process review program continues
to help identify areas that need quality improvement within the technology
centers (TC), and design training programs to enhance the quality of our
products. Leadership continues to meet regularly with front-line supervisors
and quality specialists to share knowledge; stress the importance of quality,
training and employee development; identify systemic issues; and explore
best practices. Other initiatives include focus sessions with customers
on key aspects of patent examination. "Road shows," utilized in
the biotechnology area, have brought training on the latest procedural
issues to many of patent business customers. Patent examiners continue
to attend technology fairs where industry highlights the latest in technology
and processes. Further, patentability reviews have been expanded to review
the correctness of each allowed application in the emerging technology
areas where the prior art is not well established.
Implementing the AIPA has presented
numerous challenges, as well as opportunities to improve quality in the
USPTO. In FY 2001, the patent business provided the public with text searchable
access to the published application database through the USPTO Web site.
A Patent Business Goal and AIPA Rulemaking and Patent Examination Guidelines
– first supplement was developed for distribution to internal
and external customers, and training materials for examiners were created
on inter partes reexamination. In August 2001, a new edition of the Manual
of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) was completed, which incorporates
the changes necessitated by the AIPA and a number of final rule packages
that became effective since the last revision of the MPEP in February
2000. The electronic version of the new edition of the MPEP in PDF was
posted on the USPTO Web site in September 2001.
Results: Customer Satisfaction
Measure: Increase overall customer
satisfaction from 64 percent to 80 percent by FY 2006.
|
D
Discussion: Target
not met. The USPTO has been surveying customers of the patent process
since FY 1995. Overall satisfaction remained virtually the same
until FY 1998 with significant improvement in FY 1999 and FY 2000.
Our survey contractors labeled this 5 percent increase "statistically
significant." They have cautioned us that repeated "significant"
increases in overall satisfaction are highly unusual. We will concentrate
on improving key drivers of customer satisfaction, such as providing
consistency of office communications from examiners, managing pendencies
in high-growth technologies, and reducing backlog in status letter
inquiries.
|
DATA VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION
- Data source: Customer
surveys.
- Frequency: Surveys
are conducted and results are reported annually.
- Data storage: Paper
files and contractor electronic files.
- Verification: Independent
contractor develops data instrument, conducts survey and compiles results.
- Data Limitations: None.
|

Patent
Application Publication No. US 2001/0035658 for a "vehicle and
bumper assembly…," filed electronically by Rader, Fishman,
et al, LLP, for Jeffrey A. Anderson et al of Michigan, and published
after 18 months.
|
Customer satisfaction with the patent
business service is high, given the nature of the business. Customers
are most satisfied that employees treat them with courtesy each time they
contact the agency, that assistance is available at a time convenient
to them, application instructions are clear, the telephone is used to
resolve examination issues, the outcome met their objectives, and final
decisions are fair. Yet there continues to be opportunities for improvement.
Areas for improvement include the time required to correct problems, consistency
of examinations, accuracy in correcting problems, and the time required
for responding to status letters.
The patent business expanded the number
of customer service centers throughout the organization to answer customer
questions and resolve problems correctly and in a timely manner. The business
piloted an automated complaint management system to analyze the root-cause
of problems and improve processes. The USPTO provided desktop facsimile
service to all TCs so that customers can send their documents directly
to the individual responsible for getting their issues resolved. The patent
business also has expanded the number of customers having direct access
to their application information through the online PAIR system, allowing
them to check on the status of their patent applications at any time.
In FY 2002, the patent business will begin implementing systems and solutions
to respond to status letter inquiries based on feedback from the PPAC
and customers.
|

Over
180 independent inventors attended the USPTO 6th annual Independent
Inventor Conference in August last year.
|

Speakers
at the conference included, left to right: Dan Lauer, inventor of
WATERBABIES; Joanne Hayes-Rines, editor and publisher of Inventors
Digest Magazine; and Richard Levy, inventor of the
FURBY.
|
Goal: Minimize patent application
processing time
The patent
system has been the foundation of America’s great innovative success.
The system carefully balances the exclusivity incentive it offers against
disclosure, and openness of the invention that accrues to society as a
whole by the use of the invention once the term of patent protection has
ended. It is critical for the USPTO to maximize the term of patent protection
for the inventor, as well as avoid extension of patent term beyond that
necessary.
The AIPA legislation provides a guarantee
that ensures diligent applicants maximize their patent terms. Failure
of the patent business to take the actions listed below will result in
the patent term being extended one day for each day of delay.
|
Action
|
Target |
Achieved |
| Issue a first office action within
14 months of filing |
78.0%
|
74.3%
|
| Respond to an applicant’s reply
to a rejection or to an appeal brief within four months |
98.0%
|
98.1%
|
| Act on an application within four
months of a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals Target |
84.0%
|
84.1%
|
| Issue a patent within four months
of payment of an issue fee |
87.0%
|
92.2%
|
| Issue a patent within 36 months
of filing Target |
86.0%
|
87.2%
|
During
FY 2001, 414 new patent examiners were hired and trained to help reduce
processing time and address the growing workload. To provide timely information
on progress, the patent business developed new management and balanced
score-card reports to track critical performance targets. It balanced
workloads and shifted resources to address critical shortages in various
TCs. The business formed a new Technology Center 2100 to help with rapid
growth in the business method area, and transferred approximately 30 experienced
examiners from outside the electrical areas into the new TC 2100 to help
with the workload and training of newer examiners.
Results: First Action Pendency
Measure: Reduce average first action
pendency to 12 months by FY 2006.
|
D
Discussion:
Target not met. The government-wide hiring freeze prevented the
timely hiring of patent examiners. The hiring of patent examiners
will enable us to meet our target.
|
DATA VALIDATION
AND VERIFICATION
- Data source: Patent
Application Location and Monitoring (PALM) system.
- Frequency: Daily
input, monthly reporting.
- Data storage: PALM,
automated systems, reports.
- Verification: Accuracy
of supporting data is controlled through internal program edits in the
PALM system. Final test for reasonableness is performed internally by
patent examiners and supervisory and program management.
- Data Limitations: None.
With a net increase in staffing (414
hired, 263 lost: net gain of 151 examiners), and an 11 percent increase
in filings, the patent business has increased the number of first actions
by 4,349 (241,770 up from 237,421) and increased the number of balanced
disposals by 5,149 (239,493 up from 234,344).
Results : Total Pendency
Measure: Reduce average total pendency
to 26 months by FY 2006
|
D
Discussion:
Target met. Decreased the time from first action to issue and
abandonment. The hiring of patent examiners will enable us to maintain
our target.
|
DATA VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION
- Data source: PALM
system.
- Frequency: Daily
input, monthly reporting.
- Data storage: PALM,
automated systems, reports.
- Verification: Accuracy
of supporting data is controlled through internal program edits in the
PALM system. Final test for reasonableness is performed internally by
patent examiners and supervisory and program management.
- Data Limitations: None.
A performance incentive program to
increase the productivity of current resources was implemented. The technology
center group directors’ performance plan and awards program now
includes incentives to meet set production and pendency targets. A new
performance plan and awards program for supervisory patent examiners was
implemented at mid-year FY 2001, and also includes incentives to meet
set production and pendency targets.
Employee Satisfaction Initiative.
Employee ownership and accountability for providing high quality customer
service characterizes the patent business environment. The patent business
views employees as its most valuable resource, and understands the importance
of updating and expanding employee skills, knowledge, and abilities. By
providing opportunities for employees to expand their professional competencies
and experience personal growth and development in their careers, the USPTO
is developing a diverse and expert staff genuinely interested in, and
capable of, supporting and helping customers get patents. As employee
satisfaction increases, the USPTO expects customer satisfaction and business
performance to increase as well.
The patent business developed a new
program for automation training for examiners and supervisors. The program
was developed based on extensive feedback from examiners and includes
the following key concepts: a bank of training hours, core curriculum,
self-registration, non-traditional training hours, and online course catalog.
This new automation-training program empowers employees to design their
own automation training curriculum based on their level of expertise and
their work schedule. This program has received tremendous positive feedback
from employees. This past year, considerable time, energy, and resources
were devoted to developing a knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) developmental
guide for technical support employees. As a partnership effort between
the National Treasury Employees Union - Local 243 and the USPTO, this
project will identify the KSAs needed as the patent business transitions
to an e-Government environment.
The annual patent employee satisfaction
survey showed a marked improvement this fiscal year. The percent of employees
in the patent business area who are satisfied with their job reached 65,
a 10 percent increase over FY 2000 results. The patent business continues
to make great progress in key measures that drive employee satisfaction,
most notably the percent of patent employees who feel proud to work for
the USPTO, who are proud of the work that they do, and who are satisfied
with communication across the office.
These innovative initiatives have helped
the patent business achieve many of the FY 2001 goals. In FY 2002, the
patent business will continue to work with employees, managers and the
PPAC to explore other opportunities to increase the quality of patent
business products and improve the overall level of customer satisfaction.
|

Deputy
Secretary of Commerce Bodman learns more about electronic patent
searching during a visit to the USPTO last year.
|
Patent Performance
The American Inventors Protection Act,
Title VI, Subtitle G, the Patent and Trademark Office Efficiency Act,
established the USPTO as a Performance Based Organization (PBO) on March
29, 2000. The legislation allows appointment of a Commissioner for Patents
as the Chief Operating Officer for Patents, and a Commissioner for Trademarks
as the Chief Operating Officer for Trademarks. It also requires that an
annual performance agreement be established between the Commissioners
and the Secretary of Commerce. The agreement outlines measurable organizational
goals and objectives for the PBO. The Commissioners may be rewarded a
bonus, based upon an evaluation of their performance as defined in the
agreement, of up to 50 percent of their base salary.
The patent business goals formed the
foundation for the annual performance agreement between the Commissioner
for Patents and the Secretary of Commerce, as required by the AIPA. The
performance agreement outlined measurable organizational goals and objectives
for the patent business based on the above goals and performance measures.
At the time of publication, the Commissioner for Patents performance bonus
had not been determined.
|