RECENT

• Ex Parte Belinne, No. 2009-004693 (10 August 2009)
• Ex Parte Moon, No. 2008-005829 (22 July 2009)
• Ex Parte Maeda, No. 2008-006267 (22 July 2009)
• Ex Parte Frenk, No. 2009-005654 (19 June 2009)
• Ex Parte Toth, No. 2009-009323 (15 June 2009)
• Ex Parte Toth, No. 2008-004543 (15 June 2009)
• Amegen, Inc. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc., No. 105,613 (5 June 2009) (Paper 79)
• Ex Parte Daniels, No. 2008-0568 (20 May 2009)
• Ex Parte Janakiraman, No. 2008-0998 (6 May 2009)
• Rodriguez Rilo v Benedict, No. 105,684 (RT) (23 March 2009) (Paper 17)
• Ex Parte Sami Chemicals and Extracts, LTD., No. 2007-3482 (2 February 2009)
• Barany v. McGall, No. 105,351 (6 February 2009) (Paper 59)
• Ex Parte Chuang, No. 2008-5143 (13 November 2008)

Back to top

A-C

A

• Ex Parte Adams., No. 2007-0441 (14 March 2007)
• Anderson v. Dionex Corp.,  No. 104,446 (18 October 2000)
• Ex Parte Ashkenazi., No. 2005-2208 (20 October 2005)
• Ashurst v. Brugger, No. 105-482 (25 April 2007) (Paper 44)

B

• Bamberger v. Cheruvu, No. 103,844 (2000) (Paper 405)
• Ex Parte Batteux, No. 2007-0622 (27 March 2007)
• Ex Parte Beineke, No. 2007-4215 (31 July 2008)
• Ex Parte Beineke, No. 2007-3882 (30 July 2008)
• Ex Parte Bilski, No. 2002-2257 (26 September 2006)
• Ex Parte Bobrowski, No. 2008-0580 (31 March 2008)
• Ex Parte Bradshaw, No. 2006-2744 (19 July 2007)

C

• R.C. v. T.I., No. 104,EEE (1999)
• Ex Parte Casey, No. 2007-4317 (28 February 2008)
• Charlton v. Rosenstein, No. 104,148 (9 June 2000)
• Correa v. Roberts, No. 105,019 (30 September 2003) (Paper 72)
• Cromlish v. D.Y., No. 104,289 (9 January 2001)
• Ex Parte Curry, No. 2005-0509 (30 June 2005)

Back to top

D-F

D

• Dadgar v. Gill, No. 104,249 (1999)
• Ex Parte Dart, No. 2007-1325 (22 August 2007)
• Davis v. Hendron, No. 104,044 (1999)
• DeBoer v. Gordon, No. 105,004 (2003) (Paper 18)
• Dionne v. Liotta, No. 104,333 (2001)

E

F

Back to top

G-I

G

• Genise v. Desautels, No. 104,835 (22 May 2003) (Paper 71)
• Genise v. Desautels, No. 104,834 (12 May 2003) (Paper 66)
• Giatras v. Fukuda, No. 103, 618 (1999)
• Ex Parte Gleave, No. 2005-2447 (31 January 2006)
• Gray v. Heeres, No. 104,079 (1999)
• Gregory v. Tsui, No. 104,228 (4 January 2002) (Paper 100), aff'd mem., No. 02-1345 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
• Griggs v. Rose, No. 103,729 (1999)
• Guthrie v. Espiau, No. 105,393 (18 April 2007) (Paper 94)

H

• Ex Parte Hansen, No. 2007-3424 (13 May 2008)
• Herman v. Barnes, No. 104,812 (10 April 2003)
• Ex Parte Hicks, No. 2007-2715 (13 November 2007)
• Hillman v. Shyamala, No. 104,436 (28 November 2000)
• Housey v. Berman, No. 104,347 (29 January 2001)

I

• Intellectual Concepts, LLC v. Zannier, Inc., No. 105,617 (19 September 2008) (Paper 66)

Back to top

J-L

J

• Johnston v. Beachy, No. 104,DDD (1999)
• Johnston v. Beachy, No. 104,286 (30 July 2001)
• Ex Parte Jud, No. 2006-1061 (30 January 2007)

K

• Karim v. Jobson, No. 105,376 (28 February 2007) (Paper 99)
• Kaufman v. Talieh, No. 105,233 (19 November 2004) (Paper 23)
• Khavari v. D.T., No. 104,696 (2001)
• Ex Parte Kim, No. 2007-3980 (29 May 2008)
• Kopf-Sill v. Yager, No. 104,718 (2002) (Paper 81)
• Ex Parte Kraus, No. 2005-0841 Supplement (21 September 2006) (Paper 52)
• Ex Parte Kraus, No. 2005-0841 (7 April 2005) (Paper 50)
• Kundu v. Ragunathan, No. 104,843 (18 October 2002) (Paper 51)

L

• Lalonde v. Li, No. 105,607 (JL) (19 March 2008) (Paper 23)
• Ex Parte Langemyr, No. 2008-1495 (28 May 2008)
• Ex Parte Lazzara, No. 2007-0192 (13 November 2007)
• Ex Parte Lazzara, No. 2007-0192 (30 May 2007)
• Lee v. McIntyre, No. 104,461 (21 April 2000)
• Ex Parte Liebermann, No. 2007-0012 (17 May 2007)
• LeVeen v. Edwards, No. 104,290 (2002) (Paper 351)
• LeVeen v. Edwards, No. 104,290 (2002) (Paper 348)
• LeVeen v. Edwards, No. 104,290 (11 December 2000) (Paper 240)
• LeVeen v. Edwards, No. 104,290 (11 December 2000) (Paper 241)

Back to top

M-O

M

• B.M. v. H.G., No. 104,CCC (1999)
• Ex Parte Mathias, No. 2005-1851 (10 August 2005)
• Matsushima v. H.A., No. 104,354 (25 May 200)
• Ex Parte McBrearty, No. 2007-1340 (27 July 2007)
• Ex Parte McCann, No. 2008-0785 (29 May 2008)
• Ex Parte May, No. 2006-1776 (30 April 2007)

N

• G.N. v. S.W., No. 104,VVV (7 October 2000)
• Nagaraj v. Rickerby, No. 104,817 (2002) (Paper 51)
• Nau v. Ohuchida, No. 104,258 (1999) (Paper 62)
• Nau v. Ohuchida, No. 104,258 (1999) (Paper 57)
• Nevel v. Hoeller, No. 104,025 (10 May 2000)
• Noelle v. Armitage, No. 104,724 (15 May 2003) (Papers 89 & 92)
• Noelle v. Armitage, No. 104,724 (2002) (Paper 33)
• Noelle v. Lederman, No. 104,415 (2001)

O

• Ondeyka v. Shelley, No. 104,709 (2001)

Back to top

P-R

P

• Perego v. Drehmel, No. 105,467 (9 March 2007) (Paper 63)
• Ex Parte POD-NERS, L.L.C., No. 2007-3938 (29 April 2008)
• Ex Parte Porro, No. 2008-0184 (11 March 2008)
• Preputnick v. Provencher, No. 104,693 (2002) (Paper 60)

Q

R

• Rabbani v. Notomi, No. 105,427 (25 January 2008) (Paper 145)
• Ex Parte Righi, No. 2007-0590 (25 July 2007)
• Rohr v. McNulty, No. 104,804 (2003) (Paper 39)
• Rose v. Frazer, No. 104,773 (2002) (Paper 73)
• Rowells v. Vichinsky, No. 105,518 (6 March 2007) (Paper 19)
• Ryan v. Young, No. 105,504 (4 March 2008) (Paper 116)

Back to top

S-U

• A.S. v. B.R., No. 104, AAA (1998)
• Sauer, Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg., No. 104,311 (2002) (Paper 293)
• Sauer, Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg., No. 104,311 (2002) (Paper 292)
• Sauer, Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg., No. 104,311 (25 May 2001) (Paper 165)
• Sauer, Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg., No. 104,311 (9 January 2001) (Paper 147)
• Schaenzer v. Knight, No. 105,058 (29 October 2003) (Paper 41)
• Ex Parte Scholl, No. 2007-3653 (13 March 2008)
• Sever v. Glickman, No. 104, 722 (2001)
• Ex Parte Shaw, No. 1997-3258 Supplement (19 December 2005) (Paper 109)
• Ex Parte Shaw, No. 1997-3258 (21 May 2004) (Paper 94)
• Ex Parte Shealy, No. 2006-1601 (23 April 2007)
• Shiokawa v. Maienfisch, No. 104,525 (20 September 2000)
• Singh v. Brake, No. 102,728 (1998)
• Spalding v. Hartsell, No. 104,699 (2002) (Paper 92)
• Ex Parte Srinivasan, No. 2007-0512 (01 May 2007)
• Stiller v. Heid, No. 105,044 (16 September 2003) (Paper 38)
• Strelchenko v. Campbell, No. 104,809 (2002) (Paper 26)
• Strelchenko v. University of Massachusetts, No. 104,808 (18 March 2003) (Paper 88)
• Sullivan v. Bingel, No. 104,818 (2003) (Paper 73)

T

• Therriault v. Garbe, No. 104,263 (18 January 2000)
• Tropix, Inc. v. Lumigen, Inc. No. 104,459 (18 October 2000)
• Tseng v. Doroodian-Shoja, No. 104,482 (2001) (Paper 85 & 91)
• Ex Parte Tullis, No. 2006-0210 (17 May 2006)

U

• University of New Mexico v. Fordham University, No. 104,761 (2002) (Paper 47)
• University of Washington v. Eli Lilly & Co., No. 104,733 (2002) (Paper 45)

Back to top

V-Z

V

W

• F.M.W. v. D.A.T., No. 104,BBB (1998)
• Wang v. Kovesdi, No. 104,825 (2003) (Paper 75)
• Ex Parte Wasynczuk, No. 2008-1496 (2 June 2008)
• Waterman v. Birbaum, No. 104,500 (18 October 2000)
• Ex Parte Wellerdieck, No. 2007-1119 (04 May 2007)
• Wertz v. Rose, No. 104,421 (28 March 2003) (Paper 39)
• Winter v. Fujita, No. 104,283 (19 April 2000)
• Wolf v. Tomalia, No. 104,274 (1999)
• Ex Parte Wright, No. 2006-0003 (06 April 2006)

X

Y

Z

• Zhou v. Keagy, No. 104,649 (2002) (Paper 53) aff'd mem, No. 02-1528 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

Back to top